Diagnosing and treating upper back pain: insights from New Zealand's manipulative physiotherapists and osteopaths.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1080/10669817.2024.2438196
Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Tevin Smith, Suzie Belcher, Gerard Farrell, Gary Fryer, Brett Vaughan, Rob Moran
{"title":"Diagnosing and treating upper back pain: insights from New Zealand's manipulative physiotherapists and osteopaths.","authors":"Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Tevin Smith, Suzie Belcher, Gerard Farrell, Gary Fryer, Brett Vaughan, Rob Moran","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2024.2438196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Manual therapy is routinely used in the management of upper back pain (UBP), a disabling condition. However, the approach to diagnosis and treatment techniques used by manipulative physiotherapists and osteopaths is largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore knowledge about UBP, including diagnosis and treatment, by New Zealand (NZ) osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists and to investigate differences (if any) in the self-reported approaches to diagnosis and management of UBP between the professions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey administered through an online platform (Qualtrics) between September 2023 and January 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred and ten NZ osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight percent (<i>n</i> = 53) of respondents identified their profession as physiotherapists and 52% (<i>n</i> = 57) as osteopaths. Over three-quarters of respondents (77%) 'strongly agreed' that a multimodal approach is essential for effective UBP management. Osteopaths were significantly more likely to <i>often</i> proffer 'wear and tear/degeneration' (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and 'visceral referred pain' (<i>p</i> = 0.02) as the cause of a patient's UBP. In terms of management, osteopaths were significantly more likely to use soft tissue techniques (<i>p</i> < 0.01), spinal manipulations (<i>p</i> < 0.01), rib manipulations (<i>p</i> < 0.01), rib mobilizations (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and visceral techniques (<i>p</i> < 0.01), compared to physiotherapists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survey highlights a strong consensus among respondents that a multimodal approach is essential for effective UBP management. The survey also identified profession-specific approaches to the diagnosis and management of UBP. Future research using qualitative methods is required to further explore these profession-specific differences and explore outcomes of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2438196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Manual therapy is routinely used in the management of upper back pain (UBP), a disabling condition. However, the approach to diagnosis and treatment techniques used by manipulative physiotherapists and osteopaths is largely unknown.

Objectives: To explore knowledge about UBP, including diagnosis and treatment, by New Zealand (NZ) osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists and to investigate differences (if any) in the self-reported approaches to diagnosis and management of UBP between the professions.

Design: A cross-sectional survey administered through an online platform (Qualtrics) between September 2023 and January 2024.

Participants: One hundred and ten NZ osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists completed the survey.

Results: Forty-eight percent (n = 53) of respondents identified their profession as physiotherapists and 52% (n = 57) as osteopaths. Over three-quarters of respondents (77%) 'strongly agreed' that a multimodal approach is essential for effective UBP management. Osteopaths were significantly more likely to often proffer 'wear and tear/degeneration' (p < 0.01) and 'visceral referred pain' (p = 0.02) as the cause of a patient's UBP. In terms of management, osteopaths were significantly more likely to use soft tissue techniques (p < 0.01), spinal manipulations (p < 0.01), rib manipulations (p < 0.01), rib mobilizations (p < 0.01), and visceral techniques (p < 0.01), compared to physiotherapists.

Conclusions: The survey highlights a strong consensus among respondents that a multimodal approach is essential for effective UBP management. The survey also identified profession-specific approaches to the diagnosis and management of UBP. Future research using qualitative methods is required to further explore these profession-specific differences and explore outcomes of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断和治疗上背部疼痛:来自新西兰手法物理治疗师和整骨治疗师的见解。
背景:手工疗法通常用于治疗上背部疼痛(UBP),这是一种致残性疾病。然而,手法物理治疗师和整骨治疗师使用的诊断和治疗方法在很大程度上是未知的。目的:探讨新西兰(NZ)整骨治疗师和手法物理治疗师对UBP的诊断和治疗知识,并调查不同专业之间UBP诊断和治疗方法的差异(如果有的话)。设计:在2023年9月至2024年1月期间,通过在线平台(qualics)进行横断面调查。参与者:110名新西兰整骨治疗师和手法物理治疗师完成了调查。结果:48% (n = 53)的受访者认为自己的职业是物理治疗师,52% (n = 57)的受访者认为自己的职业是整骨治疗师。超过四分之三的受访者(77%)“强烈同意”多式联运方法对于有效的UBP管理至关重要。整骨治疗师更有可能经常提出“磨损/变性”(p p = 0.02)作为患者UBP的原因。在治疗方面,整骨医生明显更倾向于使用软组织技术(p pp pp)。结论:调查强调了受访者的强烈共识,即多模式方法对于有效的UBP治疗至关重要。该调查还确定了诊断和管理UBP的专业特定方法。未来的研究需要使用定性方法来进一步探索这些专业特异性差异和探索护理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
期刊最新文献
Cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus autogenic muscle energy technique for chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Short-term effectiveness of dry needling on pain and ankle range of motion in athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome- a randomized control trial. Spinal mobilization in infants reconsidered. Author response to Eric Saedt "Spinal mobilization in infants reconsidered". Tendential and unscientific opinion regarding spinal manipulative therapy in the pediatric population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1