Interprofessional team-based primary care practice and preventive cancer screening: evidence from Family Health Teams in Ontario, Canada.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1007/s10198-024-01745-4
Yihong Bai, Jennifer Reid, Steven Habbous, Rose Anne Devlin, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Sisira Sarma
{"title":"Interprofessional team-based primary care practice and preventive cancer screening: evidence from Family Health Teams in Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Yihong Bai, Jennifer Reid, Steven Habbous, Rose Anne Devlin, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Sisira Sarma","doi":"10.1007/s10198-024-01745-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care reforms introduced interprofessional team-based primary care to optimize access to health care and preventive services. In this context, preventive cancer screening represents an important measure as it is essential for the early detection of cancer and treatment. We investigated the effects of Family Health Teams (FHTs), an interprofessional team-based primary care practice setting, on cancer screening rates in Ontario, Canada. By utilizing comprehensive health administrative data from April 1st 2011 to March 31st 2023, we determined the effect of FHT on screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer while controlling for relevant physician and patient characteristics. Our analytical framework employs fractional probit models, including the Mundlak procedure, and generalized estimating equations to assess the impact of practicing in FHTs on cancer screening rates, while accounting for unobserved physician heterogeneity. Our results indicate that compared to non-FHTs, physicians practicing in FHTs have higher breast (2.4%), cervical (2%), and colon (0.8%) cancer screening rates per physician per year. The effectiveness of FHTs in promoting cancer screenings is particularly pronounced in smaller practices and among populations in rural and economically deprived areas. Our findings highlight the role of teams in enhancing preventive health care services potentially through task shifting mechanisms and suggest that such models may offer a pathway to improving access to preventive health care, especially in marginalized populations. Our research contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on the benefits of interprofessional team-based primary care in improving cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01745-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health care reforms introduced interprofessional team-based primary care to optimize access to health care and preventive services. In this context, preventive cancer screening represents an important measure as it is essential for the early detection of cancer and treatment. We investigated the effects of Family Health Teams (FHTs), an interprofessional team-based primary care practice setting, on cancer screening rates in Ontario, Canada. By utilizing comprehensive health administrative data from April 1st 2011 to March 31st 2023, we determined the effect of FHT on screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer while controlling for relevant physician and patient characteristics. Our analytical framework employs fractional probit models, including the Mundlak procedure, and generalized estimating equations to assess the impact of practicing in FHTs on cancer screening rates, while accounting for unobserved physician heterogeneity. Our results indicate that compared to non-FHTs, physicians practicing in FHTs have higher breast (2.4%), cervical (2%), and colon (0.8%) cancer screening rates per physician per year. The effectiveness of FHTs in promoting cancer screenings is particularly pronounced in smaller practices and among populations in rural and economically deprived areas. Our findings highlight the role of teams in enhancing preventive health care services potentially through task shifting mechanisms and suggest that such models may offer a pathway to improving access to preventive health care, especially in marginalized populations. Our research contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on the benefits of interprofessional team-based primary care in improving cancer screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于专业团队的初级保健实践和预防性癌症筛查:来自加拿大安大略省家庭健康团队的证据。
保健改革引入了以专业团队为基础的初级保健,以优化获得保健和预防服务的机会。在这种情况下,预防性癌症筛查是一项重要措施,因为它对癌症的早期发现和治疗至关重要。我们调查了家庭健康团队(FHTs)对加拿大安大略省癌症筛查率的影响,这是一个基于跨专业团队的初级保健实践环境。通过利用2011年4月1日至2023年3月31日的综合健康管理数据,在控制相关医生和患者特征的情况下,我们确定了FHT对乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的影响。我们的分析框架采用分数概率模型(包括Mundlak程序)和广义估计方程来评估FHTs执业对癌症筛查率的影响,同时考虑到未观察到的医师异质性。我们的研究结果表明,与非FHTs相比,FHTs执业医师每年的乳腺癌(2.4%)、宫颈癌(2%)和结肠癌(0.8%)筛查率更高。FHTs在促进癌症筛查方面的有效性在规模较小的诊所以及农村和经济贫困地区的人群中尤为明显。我们的研究结果强调了团队在加强预防保健服务方面的作用,可能通过任务转移机制,并表明这种模式可能为改善获得预防保健的途径,特别是在边缘化人群中。我们的研究通过提供基于跨专业团队的初级保健在改善癌症筛查方面的益处的经验证据,为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
Changes in disposable income of Polish households and growing trends in alcohol mortality. Explaining variations in government health expenditure: evidence from Canada. The impact of different perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of remote patient monitoring for patients with heart failure in different European countries. Is there a link between health care utilisation and subjective well-being? An exploratory study among older Danes. Costs associated with insufficient physical activity in Germany: cross-sectional results from the baseline examination of the German national cohort (NAKO).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1