Knowledge and attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy in an academic psychiatric department.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY South African Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2302
Lerato L Masenya, Yvette M Nel
{"title":"Knowledge and attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy in an academic psychiatric department.","authors":"Lerato L Masenya, Yvette M Nel","doi":"10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Negative attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) among health professionals have been attributed to a lack of knowledge, despite advancements in its administration and evidence of its efficacy in certain psychiatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assesses knowledge and attitudes towards ECT among psychiatry and clinical psychology professionals.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The University of the Witwatersrand, Department of Psychiatry, Johannesburg, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional design was used. All psychiatry and clinical psychology professionals associated with the university were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey from 01 September 2022 to 30 June 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 49.6% (<i>n</i> = 58) among psychiatrits and 22.2% (<i>n</i> = 22) among clinical psychology professionals. Psyhiatrists had greater knowldge and more favourable attitudes than psychologists. Only 45.5% of psychologists had exposure to ECT, compared to 93.1% of psychiatrists. Knowledge and attitude scores were significanly correlated (<i>p</i> = 0.009, OR 6.7). Most psychologists (86.4%) recommended ECT theory be included in their curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater knowledge correlates with improved attitudes towards ECT. Increased training could enhance attitudes, particularly among psychology professionals.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study offers insights into knowledge and attitudes towarss ECT in a Johannesburg psychiatry department.</p>","PeriodicalId":51156,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"30 ","pages":"2302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v30i0.2302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Negative attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) among health professionals have been attributed to a lack of knowledge, despite advancements in its administration and evidence of its efficacy in certain psychiatric conditions.

Aim: This study assesses knowledge and attitudes towards ECT among psychiatry and clinical psychology professionals.

Setting: The University of the Witwatersrand, Department of Psychiatry, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional design was used. All psychiatry and clinical psychology professionals associated with the university were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey from 01 September 2022 to 30 June 2023.

Results: The response rate was 49.6% (n = 58) among psychiatrits and 22.2% (n = 22) among clinical psychology professionals. Psyhiatrists had greater knowldge and more favourable attitudes than psychologists. Only 45.5% of psychologists had exposure to ECT, compared to 93.1% of psychiatrists. Knowledge and attitude scores were significanly correlated (p = 0.009, OR 6.7). Most psychologists (86.4%) recommended ECT theory be included in their curriculum.

Conclusion: Greater knowledge correlates with improved attitudes towards ECT. Increased training could enhance attitudes, particularly among psychology professionals.

Contribution: This study offers insights into knowledge and attitudes towarss ECT in a Johannesburg psychiatry department.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术精神科对电休克疗法的认识和态度。
背景:卫生专业人员对电痉挛疗法(ECT)持消极态度的原因是缺乏相关知识,尽管电痉挛疗法的应用取得了进步,并且有证据表明电痉挛疗法对某些精神疾病有效。目的:本研究评估精神科及临床心理学专业人员对电痉挛疗法的知识及态度。地点:南非约翰内斯堡,威特沃特斯兰德大学精神病学系。方法:采用定量横断面设计。从2022年9月1日到2023年6月30日,所有与该大学有关的精神病学和临床心理学专业人员都被邀请参加了一项匿名在线调查。结果:精神科医师应答率为49.6% (n = 58),临床心理专业人员应答率为22.2% (n = 22)。精神科医生比心理学家有更多的知识和更有利的态度。只有45.5%的心理学家接触过电痉挛疗法,而精神科医生的比例为93.1%。知识与态度得分呈显著相关(p = 0.009, OR 6.7)。大多数心理学家(86.4%)建议将电痉挛疗法理论纳入他们的课程。结论:更多的知识与对电痉挛治疗态度的改善有关。增加培训可以提高态度,尤其是心理学专业人士。贡献:本研究提供了对约翰内斯堡精神科对电痉挛疗法的认识和态度的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is the leading psychiatric journal of Africa. It provides open-access scholarly reading for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists and all with an interest in mental health. It carries empirical and conceptual research articles, reviews, editorials, and scientific letters related to psychiatry. It publishes work from various places in the world, and makes special provision for the interests of Africa. It seeks to serve its readership and researchers with the most topical content in psychiatry for clinical practice and academic pursuits, including work in the subspecialty areas of psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
From stroke to depression: The need for systematic screening for post-stroke depression. The lifeworld of families of mental health care users in rural South Africa: A phenomenological study. Knowledge and attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy in an academic psychiatric department. Teaching transference focused psychotherapy to South African mental health practitioners. Safety and effectiveness of methylphenidate ER multi-unit pellet system in ADHD patients: An open label study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1