Dexmedetomidine and Nitrous Oxide as Anesthetic Agents for Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Case Report.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Ect Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000001096
In Won Chung, Heung Sik Kim, Junhee Lee, Jee Hee Kim, Sang Ha Kim, Yong Sik Kim
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine and Nitrous Oxide as Anesthetic Agents for Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Case Report.","authors":"In Won Chung, Heung Sik Kim, Junhee Lee, Jee Hee Kim, Sang Ha Kim, Yong Sik Kim","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a therapeutic intervention that induces generalized seizures under general anesthesia. This case report compares the efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and nitrous oxide (N2O) to that of propofol during ECT procedures. A 33-year-old woman with a 15-year history of schizophrenia and recurrent psychotic episodes underwent ECT. During a previous hospitalization, she underwent 14 ECT sessions using propofol and succinylcholine. The mean electrical stimulation dose was 598.9 ± 237.6 mC, with mean motor and electroencephalogram seizure durations of 23.8 ± 8.0 and 34.9 ± 8.3 seconds, respectively. During her current hospitalization, she underwent an additional 14 ECT sessions using DEX and N2O. The mean electrical stimulation dose was significantly lower, at 239.4 ± 54.7 mC, with comparable motor and electroencephalogram seizure durations of 34.6 ± 11.6 and 36.3 ± 12.5 seconds, respectively. Our case report emphasizes the effectiveness of using DEX and N2O for ECT anesthesia compared to propofol. Despite a significantly lower mean electrical stimulation dose requirement with DEX and N2O (t = 5.5155, P < 0.00001), no significant differences were observed in electroencephalogram seizure duration between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a therapeutic intervention that induces generalized seizures under general anesthesia. This case report compares the efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and nitrous oxide (N2O) to that of propofol during ECT procedures. A 33-year-old woman with a 15-year history of schizophrenia and recurrent psychotic episodes underwent ECT. During a previous hospitalization, she underwent 14 ECT sessions using propofol and succinylcholine. The mean electrical stimulation dose was 598.9 ± 237.6 mC, with mean motor and electroencephalogram seizure durations of 23.8 ± 8.0 and 34.9 ± 8.3 seconds, respectively. During her current hospitalization, she underwent an additional 14 ECT sessions using DEX and N2O. The mean electrical stimulation dose was significantly lower, at 239.4 ± 54.7 mC, with comparable motor and electroencephalogram seizure durations of 34.6 ± 11.6 and 36.3 ± 12.5 seconds, respectively. Our case report emphasizes the effectiveness of using DEX and N2O for ECT anesthesia compared to propofol. Despite a significantly lower mean electrical stimulation dose requirement with DEX and N2O (t = 5.5155, P < 0.00001), no significant differences were observed in electroencephalogram seizure duration between the groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定和氧化亚氮作为电休克治疗的麻醉剂:1例报告。
摘要:电痉挛疗法(ECT)是一种在全身麻醉下诱导全身性癫痫发作的治疗干预手段。本病例报告比较了右美托咪定(DEX)和氧化亚氮(N2O)与异丙酚在ECT手术中的疗效。一位33岁的女性,有15年的精神分裂症病史和复发性精神病发作,接受了电痉挛治疗。在之前的住院期间,她使用异丙酚和琥珀胆碱进行了14次ECT治疗。平均电刺激剂量为598.9±237.6 mC,平均运动和脑电图发作时间分别为23.8±8.0和34.9±8.3秒。在她目前住院期间,她使用DEX和N2O进行了额外的14次ECT治疗。平均电刺激剂量明显降低,为239.4±54.7 mC,运动和脑电图发作持续时间分别为34.6±11.6和36.3±12.5秒。我们的病例报告强调了与异丙酚相比,使用DEX和N2O进行ECT麻醉的有效性。尽管DEX和N2O的平均电刺激剂量显著低于对照组(t = 5.5155, P < 0.00001),但两组脑电图发作时间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Anxiety Symptoms in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression. Adjunctive High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treatment of Resistant Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. Changes in Cerebral Hemodynamic Among Patients With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Task-Related Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study. Optimizing Electroconvulsive Therapy With E-Field Modeling: A Narrative Review. Oral Esketamine as Alternative for Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1