Systematic review of survey/questionnaire-based drug utilization studies in Turkiye.

Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2024.60252
Onur Gultekin, Nazim Haspolat, Bahar Cicek, Dieudonné Havyarimana, Ahmet Akici, Volkan Aydin
{"title":"Systematic review of survey/questionnaire-based drug utilization studies in Turkiye.","authors":"Onur Gultekin, Nazim Haspolat, Bahar Cicek, Dieudonné Havyarimana, Ahmet Akici, Volkan Aydin","doi":"10.14744/nci.2024.60252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Drug utilization studies (DUS), providing insights into various aspects of pharmacoepidemiology from prescribing to medication use, can be conducted through real-world data from health records and survey-based data. In this study, we aimed to describe survey/questionnaire-based DUS conducted in Turkiye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched online databases for the most frequently used keywords in DUS from January 1993 till May 2023 and identified 180 survey-based DUS conducted in Turkiye. We described DUS by their populations, sociodemographic characteristics, timeframe, setting and provinces, data collection method, medication categories, and article-specific variables were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified that 68.3% of the DUS were in English and 91.7% were indexed in Web of Science (median 1 [interquartile range: 1-2] citation). We found that 21.7% of the articles (n=39) had pharmacology affiliation. Adults are the target population in 37.8% of the studies and age and gender were not reported in 27.2% and 16.7%, respectively. The response rate was not stated in 55.0%. We determined that 48.3% of the studies were focused on a single medication/medication group. The mean time from data collection to publication was 2.5±1.9 years, and the highest number of articles (10.6%) were published in 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our systematic review shows that the majority of DUS were listed in well-known international indices, suggesting that our local studies invoke global interest and hold a valuable position in health research. Nevertheless, lack of reporting of methodological characteristics in substantial part of the studies can be considered an important room for improvement of DUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"11 6","pages":"525-533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2024.60252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Drug utilization studies (DUS), providing insights into various aspects of pharmacoepidemiology from prescribing to medication use, can be conducted through real-world data from health records and survey-based data. In this study, we aimed to describe survey/questionnaire-based DUS conducted in Turkiye.

Methods: We searched online databases for the most frequently used keywords in DUS from January 1993 till May 2023 and identified 180 survey-based DUS conducted in Turkiye. We described DUS by their populations, sociodemographic characteristics, timeframe, setting and provinces, data collection method, medication categories, and article-specific variables were evaluated.

Results: We identified that 68.3% of the DUS were in English and 91.7% were indexed in Web of Science (median 1 [interquartile range: 1-2] citation). We found that 21.7% of the articles (n=39) had pharmacology affiliation. Adults are the target population in 37.8% of the studies and age and gender were not reported in 27.2% and 16.7%, respectively. The response rate was not stated in 55.0%. We determined that 48.3% of the studies were focused on a single medication/medication group. The mean time from data collection to publication was 2.5±1.9 years, and the highest number of articles (10.6%) were published in 2021.

Conclusion: Our systematic review shows that the majority of DUS were listed in well-known international indices, suggesting that our local studies invoke global interest and hold a valuable position in health research. Nevertheless, lack of reporting of methodological characteristics in substantial part of the studies can be considered an important room for improvement of DUS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其基于调查/问卷的药物利用研究的系统回顾。
目的:药物利用研究(DUS)可以通过来自健康记录和基于调查的数据的真实数据进行,为从处方到药物使用的药物流行病学的各个方面提供见解。在本研究中,我们旨在描述在土耳其进行的基于调查/问卷的DUS。方法:检索1993年1月至2023年5月期间在线数据库中DUS使用频率最高的关键词,并对在土耳其进行的180例基于调查的DUS进行检索。我们对DUS的人群、社会人口统计学特征、时间框架、环境和省份、数据收集方法、药物类别和文章特定变量进行了评估。结果:我们发现68.3%的DUS为英文,91.7%的DUS被Web of Science收录(中位数为1[四分位数间距:1-2])。我们发现21.7%的文章(n=39)有药理学关联。37.8%的研究以成年人为目标人群,27.2%和16.7%的研究分别未报告年龄和性别。55.0%的回复率未注明。我们确定48.3%的研究集中于单一药物/药物组。从数据收集到发表的平均时间为2.5±1.9年,发表的文章数最多(10.6%)发生在2021年。结论:我们的系统综述显示,大多数DUS被列入国际知名指标,表明我们的本地研究引起了全球的关注,在卫生研究中具有重要的地位。然而,在大部分研究中缺乏方法特征的报告可以被认为是DUS改进的一个重要空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can HALP (Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet) score distinguish malignant and benign causes of extrahepatic cholestasis in patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction? Do we know about dynapenia? Systematic review of survey/questionnaire-based drug utilization studies in Turkiye. Investigation of the presence of Epstein-Barr virus in patients who had Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Contact Lesions with Real-time PCR method in serum, tissue, and saliva samples. Vena cava and renal vein thrombosis with pheochromocytoma: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1