The frequency of macroprolactinemia among patients with hyperprolactinemia in a central laboratory of a training and research hospital.

Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2023.94758
Nilufer Bayraktar
{"title":"The frequency of macroprolactinemia among patients with hyperprolactinemia in a central laboratory of a training and research hospital.","authors":"Nilufer Bayraktar","doi":"10.14744/nci.2023.94758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Macroprolactinemia is a well-described endocrine disorder, with its results leading to unnecessary tests and overtreatment. However, routine macroprolactin screening is not performed in many laboratories. Routinely used prolactin assays can result in false diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia in patients with no signs and symptoms related to hyperprolactinemia and clinicians should be aware of macroprolactinemia frequency encountered with the method in use. In this study, it was aimed to examine the frequency of macroprolactinemia among patients with hyperprolactinemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prolactin analyses were performed on Roche Cobas<sup>®</sup> e801 immunoanalyzer using the Elecsys Prolactin II electrochemiluminesence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Samples were provided from 14 different hospitals in total and evaluated with the same method in a single central laboratory. In order to precipitate the samples for macroprolactin analysis, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we evaluated 1100 patients with hyperprolactinemia and determined the frequency of macroprolactinemia to be 9.6% (recovery cut-off value <40%), while 8.5% of the patients were in the gray zone (recovery cut-off value 40% to <60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laboratories should consider regularly screening for macroprolactinemia in all hyperprolactinemic samples and collaborate with clinicians to raise awareness about the prevalence of this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"11 6","pages":"520-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.94758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Macroprolactinemia is a well-described endocrine disorder, with its results leading to unnecessary tests and overtreatment. However, routine macroprolactin screening is not performed in many laboratories. Routinely used prolactin assays can result in false diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia in patients with no signs and symptoms related to hyperprolactinemia and clinicians should be aware of macroprolactinemia frequency encountered with the method in use. In this study, it was aimed to examine the frequency of macroprolactinemia among patients with hyperprolactinemia.

Methods: Prolactin analyses were performed on Roche Cobas® e801 immunoanalyzer using the Elecsys Prolactin II electrochemiluminesence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Samples were provided from 14 different hospitals in total and evaluated with the same method in a single central laboratory. In order to precipitate the samples for macroprolactin analysis, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 was used.

Results: In this study, we evaluated 1100 patients with hyperprolactinemia and determined the frequency of macroprolactinemia to be 9.6% (recovery cut-off value <40%), while 8.5% of the patients were in the gray zone (recovery cut-off value 40% to <60%).

Conclusion: Laboratories should consider regularly screening for macroprolactinemia in all hyperprolactinemic samples and collaborate with clinicians to raise awareness about the prevalence of this condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can HALP (Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet) score distinguish malignant and benign causes of extrahepatic cholestasis in patients with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction? Do we know about dynapenia? Systematic review of survey/questionnaire-based drug utilization studies in Turkiye. Investigation of the presence of Epstein-Barr virus in patients who had Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Contact Lesions with Real-time PCR method in serum, tissue, and saliva samples. Vena cava and renal vein thrombosis with pheochromocytoma: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1