Ethics of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment: mapping the terrain

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1093/humrep/deae264
Julian J Koplin, Molly Johnston, Amy N S Webb, Andrea Whittaker, Catherine Mills
{"title":"Ethics of artificial intelligence in embryo assessment: mapping the terrain","authors":"Julian J Koplin, Molly Johnston, Amy N S Webb, Andrea Whittaker, Catherine Mills","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deae264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to standardize and automate important aspects of fertility treatment, improving clinical outcomes. One promising application of AI in the fertility clinic is the use of machine learning (ML) tools to assess embryos for transfer. The successful clinical implementation of these tools in ways that do not erode consumer trust requires an awareness of the ethical issues that these technologies raise, and the development of strategies to manage any ethical concerns. However, to date, there has been little published literature on the ethics of using ML in embryo assessment. This mini-review contributes to this nascent area of discussion by surveying the key ethical concerns raised by ML technologies in healthcare and medicine more generally, and identifying which are germane to the use of ML in the assessment of embryos. We report concerns about the ‘dehumanization’ of human reproduction, algorithmic bias, responsibility, transparency and explainability, deskilling, and justice.","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to standardize and automate important aspects of fertility treatment, improving clinical outcomes. One promising application of AI in the fertility clinic is the use of machine learning (ML) tools to assess embryos for transfer. The successful clinical implementation of these tools in ways that do not erode consumer trust requires an awareness of the ethical issues that these technologies raise, and the development of strategies to manage any ethical concerns. However, to date, there has been little published literature on the ethics of using ML in embryo assessment. This mini-review contributes to this nascent area of discussion by surveying the key ethical concerns raised by ML technologies in healthcare and medicine more generally, and identifying which are germane to the use of ML in the assessment of embryos. We report concerns about the ‘dehumanization’ of human reproduction, algorithmic bias, responsibility, transparency and explainability, deskilling, and justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胚胎评估中的人工智能伦理:绘制地形
人工智能(AI)有可能使生育治疗的重要方面标准化和自动化,改善临床结果。人工智能在生育诊所的一个有前途的应用是使用机器学习(ML)工具来评估胚胎的移植。要想在临床成功地应用这些工具,同时又不损害消费者的信任,就必须意识到这些技术带来的伦理问题,并制定策略来管理任何伦理问题。然而,迄今为止,很少有关于在胚胎评估中使用ML的伦理的发表文献。这篇小型综述通过更广泛地调查医疗保健和医学中ML技术提出的关键伦理问题,并确定哪些与ML在胚胎评估中的使用相关,从而有助于这一新兴领域的讨论。我们报告了对人类繁殖的“非人性化”、算法偏见、责任、透明度和可解释性、去技能化和正义的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
期刊最新文献
Ethical considerations on surrogacy†. Recurrent implantation failure: science or fiction? A randomized controlled trial comparing embryo vitrification with slush nitrogen to liquid nitrogen in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer: embryology and clinical outcomes Beyond the disclosure debate in donor-conception: how do we help families to discuss origin stories with their children? Endometriosis and risk of depression among oral contraceptive users: a pooled analysis of cohort studies from 13 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1