Addressing Sample Mix-Ups: Tools and Approaches for Large-Scale Multi-Omics Studies.

IF 3.4 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Proteomics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1002/pmic.202400271
Yingxue Fu, Zuo-Fei Yuan, Long Wu, Junmin Peng, Xusheng Wang, Anthony A High
{"title":"Addressing Sample Mix-Ups: Tools and Approaches for Large-Scale Multi-Omics Studies.","authors":"Yingxue Fu, Zuo-Fei Yuan, Long Wu, Junmin Peng, Xusheng Wang, Anthony A High","doi":"10.1002/pmic.202400271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in high-throughput omics technologies have enabled system-wide characterization of biological samples across multiple molecular levels, such as the genome, transcriptome, and proteome. However, as sample sizes rapidly increase in large-scale multi-omics studies, sample mix-ups have become a prevalent issue, compromising data integrity and leading to erroneous conclusions. The interconnected nature of multi-omics data presents an opportunity to identify and correct these errors. This review examines the potential sources of sample mix-ups and evaluates the methodologies and tools developed for detecting and correcting these errors, with an emphasis on approaches applicable to proteomics data. We categorize existing tools into three main groups: expression/protein quantitative trait loci-based, genotype concordance-based, and gene/protein expression correlation-based approaches. Notably, only a handful of tools currently utilize the proteogenomics approach for correcting sample mix-ups at the proteomics level. Integrating the strengths of current tools across diverse data types could enable the development of more versatile and comprehensive solutions. In conclusion, verifying sample identity is a critical first step to reduce bias and increase precision in subsequent analyses for large-scale multi-omics studies. By leveraging these tools for identifying and correcting sample mix-ups, researchers can significantly improve the reliability and reproducibility of biomedical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":224,"journal":{"name":"Proteomics","volume":" ","pages":"e202400271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in high-throughput omics technologies have enabled system-wide characterization of biological samples across multiple molecular levels, such as the genome, transcriptome, and proteome. However, as sample sizes rapidly increase in large-scale multi-omics studies, sample mix-ups have become a prevalent issue, compromising data integrity and leading to erroneous conclusions. The interconnected nature of multi-omics data presents an opportunity to identify and correct these errors. This review examines the potential sources of sample mix-ups and evaluates the methodologies and tools developed for detecting and correcting these errors, with an emphasis on approaches applicable to proteomics data. We categorize existing tools into three main groups: expression/protein quantitative trait loci-based, genotype concordance-based, and gene/protein expression correlation-based approaches. Notably, only a handful of tools currently utilize the proteogenomics approach for correcting sample mix-ups at the proteomics level. Integrating the strengths of current tools across diverse data types could enable the development of more versatile and comprehensive solutions. In conclusion, verifying sample identity is a critical first step to reduce bias and increase precision in subsequent analyses for large-scale multi-omics studies. By leveraging these tools for identifying and correcting sample mix-ups, researchers can significantly improve the reliability and reproducibility of biomedical research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决样本混淆:大规模多组学研究的工具和方法。
高通量组学技术的进步使生物样品在多个分子水平上的全系统表征成为可能,如基因组、转录组和蛋白质组。然而,随着大规模多组学研究中样本量的迅速增加,样本混淆已经成为一个普遍存在的问题,损害了数据的完整性并导致错误的结论。多组学数据的互联性为识别和纠正这些错误提供了机会。这篇综述检查了样品混淆的潜在来源,并评估了用于检测和纠正这些错误的方法和工具,重点是适用于蛋白质组学数据的方法。我们将现有的工具分为三大类:基于表达/蛋白质数量性状位点的方法、基于基因型一致性的方法和基于基因/蛋白质表达相关性的方法。值得注意的是,目前只有少数工具利用蛋白质基因组学方法在蛋白质组学水平上纠正样品混淆。跨不同数据类型集成当前工具的优势可以开发更通用和全面的解决方案。总之,验证样本身份是减少偏差和提高后续大规模多组学研究分析精度的关键第一步。通过利用这些工具来识别和纠正样本混淆,研究人员可以显著提高生物医学研究的可靠性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomics
Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PROTEOMICS is the premier international source for information on all aspects of applications and technologies, including software, in proteomics and other "omics". The journal includes but is not limited to proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics, and systems biology approaches. Papers describing novel applications of proteomics and integration of multi-omics data and approaches are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Proteomic Insight Into Alzheimer's Disease Pathogenesis Pathways. The Omics-Driven Machine Learning Path to Cost-Effective Precision Medicine in Chronic Kidney Disease. The Proteomic Landscape of the Coronary Accessible Heart Cell Surfaceome. Decoding Microbial Plastic Colonisation: Multi-Omic Insights Into the Fast-Evolving Dynamics of Early-Stage Biofilms. Fecal Metaproteomics as a Tool to Monitor Functional Modifications Induced in the Gut Microbiota by Ketogenic Diet: A Case Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1