The safety profile of usage of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in pregnancy: A pharmacovigilance analysis based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16354
Jianxing Zhou, Zipeng Wei, Weipeng Lai, Maobai Liu, Xuemei Wu
{"title":"The safety profile of usage of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in pregnancy: A pharmacovigilance analysis based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Jianxing Zhou, Zipeng Wei, Weipeng Lai, Maobai Liu, Xuemei Wu","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The use of (GLP-1 RAs) among pregnant women is escalating, yet safety data remain insufficient. This study aims to comprehensively assess adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with GLP-1 RAs in pregnant women using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS data from 2004 to 2023 were analysed, focusing on pregnant women aged 15-55 years exposed to GLP-1 RAs. Descriptive analysis covered patient demographics, clinical aspects and annual trends. Disproportionality analysis used reporting odds ratio and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network to detect ADR signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 354 cases with 1671 ADR reports, an exponential rise in reported cases since 2012 was observed. The median age of the affected women was 36 years, with 50.56% classified as advanced age pregnant. The disproportionality analysis revealed significant ADR signals in the reproductive (n = 199) and gastrointestinal systems (n = 155), with spontaneous abortion and pre-eclampsia being the most concerning. Additionally, while no significant dose-related differences were found, the age subgroup analysis indicated heightened risk across most age groups, except for those aged 20-24 years, highlighting the need for careful monitoring of GLP-1 RAs used during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights increasing GLP-1 RA use in pregnant women and identifies potential pregnant ADRs. GLP-1 RAs are not recommended for use during pregnancy. In cases of unintentional exposure, close monitoring is advised to ensure maternal and foetal safety. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians making informed decisions and regulators considering using GLP-1 RA in pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The use of (GLP-1 RAs) among pregnant women is escalating, yet safety data remain insufficient. This study aims to comprehensively assess adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with GLP-1 RAs in pregnant women using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: FAERS data from 2004 to 2023 were analysed, focusing on pregnant women aged 15-55 years exposed to GLP-1 RAs. Descriptive analysis covered patient demographics, clinical aspects and annual trends. Disproportionality analysis used reporting odds ratio and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network to detect ADR signals.

Results: Among 354 cases with 1671 ADR reports, an exponential rise in reported cases since 2012 was observed. The median age of the affected women was 36 years, with 50.56% classified as advanced age pregnant. The disproportionality analysis revealed significant ADR signals in the reproductive (n = 199) and gastrointestinal systems (n = 155), with spontaneous abortion and pre-eclampsia being the most concerning. Additionally, while no significant dose-related differences were found, the age subgroup analysis indicated heightened risk across most age groups, except for those aged 20-24 years, highlighting the need for careful monitoring of GLP-1 RAs used during pregnancy.

Conclusion: This study highlights increasing GLP-1 RA use in pregnant women and identifies potential pregnant ADRs. GLP-1 RAs are not recommended for use during pregnancy. In cases of unintentional exposure, close monitoring is advised to ensure maternal and foetal safety. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians making informed decisions and regulators considering using GLP-1 RA in pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing preclinical models of ageing for translation to clinical trials. Frailty in clinical drug trials: Frailty assessments, subgroup analyses and outcomes. Innovations in pharmacovigilance studies of medicines in older people. Mobile applications on app stores for deprescribing: A scoping review. The effects of diuretic deprescribing in adult patients: A systematic review to inform an evidence-based diuretic deprescribing guideline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1