Shared decision-making in central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1093/ced/llae535
Elizabeth Swain, Renee Haughton, Victoria Palmer, Ivie Obeime, Amy McMichael
{"title":"Shared decision-making in central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia.","authors":"Elizabeth Swain, Renee Haughton, Victoria Palmer, Ivie Obeime, Amy McMichael","doi":"10.1093/ced/llae535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) is a primary lymphocytic scarring alopecia, which predominantly occurs in middle-aged Black women. The benefits and use of shared decision-making (SDM) models in patients with CCCA have yet to be studied. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the role of SDM in the management of CCCA. SDM processes were evaluated using the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) and the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Between June and August 2023, members of the Scarring Alopecia Foundation were emailed and invited to participate; n = 87/1192 members responded. The CPS responses suggested that most patients (48%, n = 41/87) preferred to share responsibility with their doctor for treatment decisions. The SDM-Q-9 (scored 0-45) and DRS (scored 0-100) demonstrated mean (SD) scores of 27.5 (11.5) and 38.4 (19.4), with higher and lower scores, respectively, demonstrating greater patient satisfaction with SDM. SDM is useful for patients involved in complex decision-making when several medically reasonable treatment alternatives are available. Patients with CCCA may benefit from this model, and investment in resources such as patient decision aids and SDM training for dermatologists will aid integration into clinical practice. Together, the CPS, DRS and SDM-Q-9 results suggested that patients with CCCA preferred to be involved in their treatment management decisions, regardless of their sociodemographic characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"998-1001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) is a primary lymphocytic scarring alopecia, which predominantly occurs in middle-aged Black women. The benefits and use of shared decision-making (SDM) models in patients with CCCA have yet to be studied. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the role of SDM in the management of CCCA. SDM processes were evaluated using the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) and the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Between June and August 2023, members of the Scarring Alopecia Foundation were emailed and invited to participate; n = 87/1192 members responded. The CPS responses suggested that most patients (48%, n = 41/87) preferred to share responsibility with their doctor for treatment decisions. The SDM-Q-9 (scored 0-45) and DRS (scored 0-100) demonstrated mean (SD) scores of 27.5 (11.5) and 38.4 (19.4), with higher and lower scores, respectively, demonstrating greater patient satisfaction with SDM. SDM is useful for patients involved in complex decision-making when several medically reasonable treatment alternatives are available. Patients with CCCA may benefit from this model, and investment in resources such as patient decision aids and SDM training for dermatologists will aid integration into clinical practice. Together, the CPS, DRS and SDM-Q-9 results suggested that patients with CCCA preferred to be involved in their treatment management decisions, regardless of their sociodemographic characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中央离心式瘢痕性脱发的共同决策。
背景:中心性离心性瘢痕性脱发(CCCA)是一种主要发生于黑人中年妇女的原发性淋巴细胞瘢痕性脱发。共同决策(SDM)模式对CCCA患者的益处和流行程度尚待研究。本研究探讨SDM在CCCA管理中的作用。方法:采用SDM- q9、决策后悔量表(DRS)和患者控制偏好量表(CPS)对SDM过程进行测量。疤痕性脱发基金会的成员(n=1192)是在2023年6月至8月间通过疤痕性脱发基金会的列表服务器发送的一次性电子邮件招募的。结果:87名受访者被记录在案。CPS (n=87)提示大多数患者(47.6%;N =41)更愿意与医生共同承担治疗决定的责任。SDM Q-9(评分0-45)和DRS[评分0-100]的平均得分分别为27.5分(11.5分)和38.4分(19.4分),得分较高和较低,表明患者对SDM满意。讨论:当有几种医学上合理的治疗选择时,SDM在复杂的决策中是有用的。CCCA患者可能会从这种模式中受益,对资源的投资,如患者决策辅助工具和对皮肤科医生的SDM培训,将有助于融入临床实践。局限性:没有验证被调查者CCCA诊断的方法。此外,大多数受访者接受过高等教育,这限制了对更广泛人群的普遍性。最后,低调查回复率(9.7%)容易导致无反应偏差。结论:CPS、SDM-Q-9和DRS提示CCCA患者更倾向于参与管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Dermoscopy in Optimising Surgical Margins for Keratinocyte Cancers: Updated Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comment on 'Antibiotics, analgesics and antifungals are commonly implicated in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis; a retrospective analysis of 1410 cases': a fresh progress. Counting the cost: An economic and environmental analysis of single-use versus multi-use surgical equipment in a tertiary dermatology department of Ireland. Comment on "National dermatological surgery sustainability survey: an evaluation of healthcare professional beliefs and practices". 'Visual literacy: seeing the skin course' effect on clinician observational and descriptive skills in skin of colour and white skin. Burning Truths and Deadly Glows: Unmasking the Social Media-Driven Rise of Dangerous Tanning Trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1