Lower vs. higher blood pressure targets during intensive care of comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a Bayesian analysis of the BOX trial.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1093/ehjacc/zuae142
Johannes Grand, Anders Granholm, Sebastian Wiberg, Henrik Schmidt, Jacob E Møller, Simon Mølstrøm, Martin A S Meyer, Jakob Josiassen, Rasmus P Beske, Jordi S Dahl, Laust E R Obling, Martin Frydland, Britt Borregaard, Vibeke Lind Jørgensen, Jakob Hartvig Thomsen, Søren Aalbæk Madsen, Benjamin Nyholm, Christian Hassager, Jesper Kjaergaard
{"title":"Lower vs. higher blood pressure targets during intensive care of comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a Bayesian analysis of the BOX trial.","authors":"Johannes Grand, Anders Granholm, Sebastian Wiberg, Henrik Schmidt, Jacob E Møller, Simon Mølstrøm, Martin A S Meyer, Jakob Josiassen, Rasmus P Beske, Jordi S Dahl, Laust E R Obling, Martin Frydland, Britt Borregaard, Vibeke Lind Jørgensen, Jakob Hartvig Thomsen, Søren Aalbæk Madsen, Benjamin Nyholm, Christian Hassager, Jesper Kjaergaard","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuae142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Blood Pressure and Oxygenation (BOX) targets after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest trial found no statistically significant differences in mortality or neurological outcomes with mean arterial blood pressure targets of 63 vs. 77 mmHg in patients receiving intensive care post-cardiac arrest. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect on 1-year mortality and assess heterogeneity in treatment effects (HTEs) using Bayesian statistics.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analyzed 1-year all-cause mortality, 1-year neurological outcomes, and plasma neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at 48 h using Bayesian logistic and linear regressions primarily with weakly informative priors. HTE was assessed according to age, plasma lactate, time to return of spontaneous circulation, primary shockable rhythm, history of hypertension, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Absolute and relative differences are presented with probabilities of any clinical benefit and harm. All 789 patients in the intention-to-treat cohort were included. The risk difference (RD) for 1-year mortality was 1.5%-points [95% credible interval (CrI): -5.1 to 8.1], with <33% probability of benefit with the higher target. There was 33% probability for a better neurological outcome (RD: 1.5%-points; 95% CrI: -5.3 to 8.3) and 35.1% for lower NSE levels (mean difference: 1.5 µg/L, 95% CrI: -6.0 to 9.1). HTE analyses suggested potential harms of the higher blood pressure target in younger patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effects of a higher blood pressure target on overall mortality among comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were uncertain. A potential effect modification according to age warrants additional investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03141099.</p>","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"14-23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuae142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The Blood Pressure and Oxygenation (BOX) targets after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest trial found no statistically significant differences in mortality or neurological outcomes with mean arterial blood pressure targets of 63 vs. 77 mmHg in patients receiving intensive care post-cardiac arrest. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect on 1-year mortality and assess heterogeneity in treatment effects (HTEs) using Bayesian statistics.

Methods and results: We analyzed 1-year all-cause mortality, 1-year neurological outcomes, and plasma neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at 48 h using Bayesian logistic and linear regressions primarily with weakly informative priors. HTE was assessed according to age, plasma lactate, time to return of spontaneous circulation, primary shockable rhythm, history of hypertension, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Absolute and relative differences are presented with probabilities of any clinical benefit and harm. All 789 patients in the intention-to-treat cohort were included. The risk difference (RD) for 1-year mortality was 1.5%-points [95% credible interval (CrI): -5.1 to 8.1], with <33% probability of benefit with the higher target. There was 33% probability for a better neurological outcome (RD: 1.5%-points; 95% CrI: -5.3 to 8.3) and 35.1% for lower NSE levels (mean difference: 1.5 µg/L, 95% CrI: -6.0 to 9.1). HTE analyses suggested potential harms of the higher blood pressure target in younger patients.

Conclusion: The effects of a higher blood pressure target on overall mortality among comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were uncertain. A potential effect modification according to age warrants additional investigation.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03141099.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
院外心脏骤停复苏的昏迷患者重症监护期间血压目标的降低与升高——BOX试验的贝叶斯分析
背景:院外心脏骤停后血压和氧合目标(BOX)试验发现,在接受重症监护的心脏骤停后患者中,平均动脉血压目标为63与77 mmHg时,死亡率或神经学结局没有统计学上的显著差异。在本研究中,我们旨在利用贝叶斯统计评估对1年死亡率的影响,并评估治疗效果(HTE)的异质性。方法:我们使用贝叶斯逻辑和线性回归分析了1年全因死亡率、1年神经预后和48小时血浆神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)。根据年龄、血浆乳酸水平、自主循环恢复时间、原发性休克节律、高血压史和st段抬高型心肌梗死来评估HTE。绝对差异和相对差异呈现出任何临床益处和危害的概率。结果:意向治疗队列中所有789例患者均被纳入。1年死亡率的风险差异(RD)为1.5个百分点(95%可信区间[CrI]: -5.1至8.1),结论:较高血压目标对院外心脏骤停复苏的昏迷患者总体死亡率的影响是不确定的。根据年龄可能发生的影响变化值得进一步调查。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03141099。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.90%
发文量
325
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Acute Cardiovascular Care (EHJ-ACVC) offers a unique integrative approach by combining the expertise of the different sub specialties of cardiology, emergency and intensive care medicine in the management of patients with acute cardiovascular syndromes. Reading through the journal, cardiologists and all other healthcare professionals can access continuous updates that may help them to improve the quality of care and the outcome for patients with acute cardiovascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Left ventricular-arterial coupling and mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit. Incidence of New-Onset Cardiac Arrhythmias in Cocaine and Cannabis Users: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Best of European Heart Journal - Acute Cardiovascular Care (2024-2025): Cardiogenic Shock and Mechanical Circulatory Support. Impact of Female Underrepresentation in Trials Investigating Long-Term Pharmacologic Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Question: Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1