Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL International Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1007/s00414-024-03376-z
Qingzhen Zhang, Tingting Dong, Xueqian Wang, Xiaochang Zhang, Sen Yang, Peng Cheng, Zhe Zhou, Shengqi Wang
{"title":"Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit.","authors":"Qingzhen Zhang, Tingting Dong, Xueqian Wang, Xiaochang Zhang, Sen Yang, Peng Cheng, Zhe Zhou, Shengqi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00414-024-03376-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disaster victim identification and criminal investigations have intensified the demand of complex kinship testing. Compared to close relatives, distant relatives share fewer identical-by-descent genetic segments; therefore, more genetic markers are required to improve the system effectiveness. Driven by the progress of next-generation sequencing, several commercial or in-house panels, including a large number of genetic markers, have been developed and applied in forensic caseworks. However, few efficient panels are available for first cousins (FC) kinship testing. Here, we adopted the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit, a two-step multiplex PCR strategy to detect 2,009 SNPs, and evaluated their system effectiveness in complex kinship analysis. Samples from 10,000 pairs of relatives and unrelated individuals were simulated to evaluate the system power. Simultaneously, real samples were used to further confirm this, including 72 pairs of full siblings (FS), 52 pairs of uncle/aunt/-niece/nephew (UN), 92 pairs of FC, 79 pairs of first cousin once removed (1C1R), and 780 pairs of unrelated individuals. The results showed that this kit was sufficiently powerful in FS, UN, and FC versus unrelated kinship testing and could also discriminate part of 1C1R relatives against unrelated individuals. This method was also powerful in the kinship determination of FS versus UN, FS versus FC, FS versus 1C1R, and UN versus 1C1R kinship testing but had limited power to determine UN versus FC and FC versus 1C1R relationships. This study provides an effective strategy and guidance for complex kinship analysis in forensic practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03376-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster victim identification and criminal investigations have intensified the demand of complex kinship testing. Compared to close relatives, distant relatives share fewer identical-by-descent genetic segments; therefore, more genetic markers are required to improve the system effectiveness. Driven by the progress of next-generation sequencing, several commercial or in-house panels, including a large number of genetic markers, have been developed and applied in forensic caseworks. However, few efficient panels are available for first cousins (FC) kinship testing. Here, we adopted the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit, a two-step multiplex PCR strategy to detect 2,009 SNPs, and evaluated their system effectiveness in complex kinship analysis. Samples from 10,000 pairs of relatives and unrelated individuals were simulated to evaluate the system power. Simultaneously, real samples were used to further confirm this, including 72 pairs of full siblings (FS), 52 pairs of uncle/aunt/-niece/nephew (UN), 92 pairs of FC, 79 pairs of first cousin once removed (1C1R), and 780 pairs of unrelated individuals. The results showed that this kit was sufficiently powerful in FS, UN, and FC versus unrelated kinship testing and could also discriminate part of 1C1R relatives against unrelated individuals. This method was also powerful in the kinship determination of FS versus UN, FS versus FC, FS versus 1C1R, and UN versus 1C1R kinship testing but had limited power to determine UN versus FC and FC versus 1C1R relationships. This study provides an effective strategy and guidance for complex kinship analysis in forensic practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
期刊最新文献
Exploring radiomic features of lateral cerebral ventricles in postmortem CT for postmortem interval estimation. Fluorescence of various buried fresh and fresh-frozen-thawed tissue types up until the point of active decay: a human taphonomy study. Exploration and application of microorganisms related to the inference of the time since deposition (TsD) in semen and blood stains. Construction of the time since deposition (TsD) model in saliva stains with 16S rRNA full-length sequencing technology and microbial markers. Expression of RIPK-1 and S-100B in traumatic brain injury- exploring a forensic cases series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1