Intra-peritoneal Povidone-iodine Irrigation Decreases Abscesses in a Perforated Appendicitis Murine Model.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162081
Derek J Krinock, Krista Stephenson, David Irby, Chary Akmyradov, Melanie Barker, Zachary Waldrip, Marie Burdine, Lindsey L Wolf, Melvin S Dassinger, Deidre Wyrick
{"title":"Intra-peritoneal Povidone-iodine Irrigation Decreases Abscesses in a Perforated Appendicitis Murine Model.","authors":"Derek J Krinock, Krista Stephenson, David Irby, Chary Akmyradov, Melanie Barker, Zachary Waldrip, Marie Burdine, Lindsey L Wolf, Melvin S Dassinger, Deidre Wyrick","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with perforated appendicitis frequently form post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA). Intra-peritoneal irrigation for prevention remains controversial. Using a perforated appendicitis murine model, we sought to determine the effect of intra-peritoneal irrigation on post-operative IAA and adhesion formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survival operation was performed where cecal ligation and puncture was used to simulate perforated appendicitis. After 72 h, mice underwent a second operation where a distal cecectomy and intra-peritoneal irrigation was performed. Mice were assigned to a no irrigation group or one of four irrigation groups: normal saline, povidone-iodine (PVI), tacrolimus, or PVI followed by tacrolimus. At 2-weeks or 2-months after the second survival operation, mice were euthanized and IAAs were counted, measured, and cultured. Intra-peritoneal adhesion severity was graded on a 4-point scale. Statistical analysis compared IAA numbers and adhesion grade between the irrigation groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 2-week cohort, prevalence of IAA was 78 % (n = 129). Type of irrigation solution was associated with abscess development (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons demonstrated PVI alone decreased abscess count. PVI irrigation caused more severe adhesions while tacrolimus decreased adhesions and adhesion grade was dependent on irrigation solution (p < 0.001). In the 2-month cohort, similar responses were observed with decreased abscess numbers in the PVI group (p = 0.006) but increased adhesion burden (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Povidone-iodine irrigation decreases intra-abdominal abscess formation, but increases adhesion formation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 1: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 3","pages":"162081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with perforated appendicitis frequently form post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA). Intra-peritoneal irrigation for prevention remains controversial. Using a perforated appendicitis murine model, we sought to determine the effect of intra-peritoneal irrigation on post-operative IAA and adhesion formation.

Methods: A survival operation was performed where cecal ligation and puncture was used to simulate perforated appendicitis. After 72 h, mice underwent a second operation where a distal cecectomy and intra-peritoneal irrigation was performed. Mice were assigned to a no irrigation group or one of four irrigation groups: normal saline, povidone-iodine (PVI), tacrolimus, or PVI followed by tacrolimus. At 2-weeks or 2-months after the second survival operation, mice were euthanized and IAAs were counted, measured, and cultured. Intra-peritoneal adhesion severity was graded on a 4-point scale. Statistical analysis compared IAA numbers and adhesion grade between the irrigation groups.

Results: In the 2-week cohort, prevalence of IAA was 78 % (n = 129). Type of irrigation solution was associated with abscess development (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons demonstrated PVI alone decreased abscess count. PVI irrigation caused more severe adhesions while tacrolimus decreased adhesions and adhesion grade was dependent on irrigation solution (p < 0.001). In the 2-month cohort, similar responses were observed with decreased abscess numbers in the PVI group (p = 0.006) but increased adhesion burden (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Povidone-iodine irrigation decreases intra-abdominal abscess formation, but increases adhesion formation.

Level of evidence: 1:

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Malignant Hyperthermia in Pediatric Surgery: Essential Awareness and Crisis Management. Congenital Tracheal Stenosis With Complete Cartilage Rings: Proposal of A Multidisciplinary and Tailored Surgical Approach. Intra-peritoneal Povidone-iodine Irrigation Decreases Abscesses in a Perforated Appendicitis Murine Model. Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Malone Antegrade Continent Enema: Optimizing Outcomes in Pediatric Bowel Management. Report of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Association of Pediatric Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1