The Effect of Two Types of Subcutaneous Heparin Injections on Pain, Ecchymosis, Hematoma and Drug Absorption: A Quasi-Experimental Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1111/jep.14266
Sule Biyik Bayram, Emel Gulnar, Nurcan Calıskan, Polat Kosucu, Onur Bektas, Aysun Bayram, Fatma Aksoy
{"title":"The Effect of Two Types of Subcutaneous Heparin Injections on Pain, Ecchymosis, Hematoma and Drug Absorption: A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"Sule Biyik Bayram,&nbsp;Emel Gulnar,&nbsp;Nurcan Calıskan,&nbsp;Polat Kosucu,&nbsp;Onur Bektas,&nbsp;Aysun Bayram,&nbsp;Fatma Aksoy","doi":"10.1111/jep.14266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Subcutaneous heparin injections sometimes cause pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma. The prevalence of complications depends on the injection site, technique, and drug absorption. This study investigated the effect of two types of subcutaneous heparin injections on pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma as well as drug absorption rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study is a quasi-experimental. The research was conducted between September 2021 and May 2022. The sample consisted of 122 patients treated in the general surgery clinic of a university hospital in the Black Sea region of Türkiye. We used ultrasonography (USG) to measure the subcutaneous tissue thicknesses of the sites before heparin injections. We used the tissue-releasing technique (TRT) to administer heparin injections to 68 participants (Group TRT). We used the tissue-pinching technique (TPT) to administer heparin injections to 54 participants (Group TPT). We administered all injections into the arm or abdomen. We used a “Subcutaneous Injection Form” to collect data. We monitored all participants for the injection site, drug absorption after 1 day, pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma for 3 days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was no significant difference in the prevalence of pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma between the groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Most injections into the arm and abdomen resulted in drug absorption. However, one in ten injections into the arm resulted in the needle reaching the muscle rather than the subcutaneous tissue (11.7%). Abdominal injections caused no complications. The drug was administered in the right place in abdominal injections.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The tissue-releasing and TPTs are not superior to each other as far as drug absorption, pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma are concerned. In this study recommend pinching the tissue or using the abdominal region in cases where the subcutaneous tissue thickness is less than 15.96 mm. The nurse should consider Body Mass Index before choosing the right subcutaneous heparin injection site and the correct injection technique.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Subcutaneous heparin injections sometimes cause pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma. The prevalence of complications depends on the injection site, technique, and drug absorption. This study investigated the effect of two types of subcutaneous heparin injections on pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma as well as drug absorption rates.

Methods

The study is a quasi-experimental. The research was conducted between September 2021 and May 2022. The sample consisted of 122 patients treated in the general surgery clinic of a university hospital in the Black Sea region of Türkiye. We used ultrasonography (USG) to measure the subcutaneous tissue thicknesses of the sites before heparin injections. We used the tissue-releasing technique (TRT) to administer heparin injections to 68 participants (Group TRT). We used the tissue-pinching technique (TPT) to administer heparin injections to 54 participants (Group TPT). We administered all injections into the arm or abdomen. We used a “Subcutaneous Injection Form” to collect data. We monitored all participants for the injection site, drug absorption after 1 day, pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma for 3 days.

Results

There was no significant difference in the prevalence of pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma between the groups (p > 0.05). Most injections into the arm and abdomen resulted in drug absorption. However, one in ten injections into the arm resulted in the needle reaching the muscle rather than the subcutaneous tissue (11.7%). Abdominal injections caused no complications. The drug was administered in the right place in abdominal injections.

Conclusion

The tissue-releasing and TPTs are not superior to each other as far as drug absorption, pain, ecchymosis, and hematoma are concerned. In this study recommend pinching the tissue or using the abdominal region in cases where the subcutaneous tissue thickness is less than 15.96 mm. The nurse should consider Body Mass Index before choosing the right subcutaneous heparin injection site and the correct injection technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
AttributeRank: An Algorithm for Attribute Ranking in Clinical Variable Selection The 6-Item Self-Efficacy Scale in Chronic Disease Management in Women With Endometriosis: A Turkish Validity and Reliability Study Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale for the Italian Paediatric Population Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Content Validation of the Yonsei Lifestyle Profile for Older Adults in the United States Effect of Excess Mortality on Longevity During the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1