Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S475061
Ming-Yu Zhao, Wen Zeng, Sze Ngai Chan, Jianhao Du, Naman Rao, Taoran Liu, Wai-Kit Ming
{"title":"Patients' Preferences for the Treatment of a Single Missing Tooth in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Ming-Yu Zhao, Wen Zeng, Sze Ngai Chan, Jianhao Du, Naman Rao, Taoran Liu, Wai-Kit Ming","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S475061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The main treatment options offered to patients to choose from when restoring a single missing tooth include tooth-supported three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). However, due to the heterogeneity of current studies, it is difficult to objectively compare these two treatment strategies. In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to quantify the preferences of individuals undergoing restoration treatment for single tooth loss.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The DCE questionnaire was disseminated in a \"snowball\" fashion, with data collected from participants aged 18-60. Five important attributes of treatment were selected: (1) treatment procedure, (2) treatment time, (3) cost, (4) five-year survival rate, and (5) five-year complication rate. A conditional logit model was employed to ascertain the direction of participants' preferences for specific attribute levels and to derive their willingness to pay (WTP) through the principle of marginal utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>287 participants completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire revealed that the five-year complication rate (42.42%) was the most important attribute, followed by cost (20.43%), five-year survival rate (14.23%), treatment time (13.44%), and treatment procedure (9.49%). Participants were willing to pay RMB$11076.2 (USD$1,772.2) to obtain a 10% extra reduction in the five-year complication rate, and RMB$7434.6 (USD$1,189.5) for a non-invasive treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the ranking of the relative importance of key factors affecting single missing tooth restoration, complication rates are most highly valued, suggesting that reducing the complication rate is a key issue to be addressed in prosthodontics. In addition, deriving the ranking of patients' concerns about key factors can help to improve doctor-patient communication and provide a reference for treatment technology development and medical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"18 ","pages":"2455-2467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S475061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The main treatment options offered to patients to choose from when restoring a single missing tooth include tooth-supported three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). However, due to the heterogeneity of current studies, it is difficult to objectively compare these two treatment strategies. In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to quantify the preferences of individuals undergoing restoration treatment for single tooth loss.

Patients and methods: The DCE questionnaire was disseminated in a "snowball" fashion, with data collected from participants aged 18-60. Five important attributes of treatment were selected: (1) treatment procedure, (2) treatment time, (3) cost, (4) five-year survival rate, and (5) five-year complication rate. A conditional logit model was employed to ascertain the direction of participants' preferences for specific attribute levels and to derive their willingness to pay (WTP) through the principle of marginal utility.

Results: 287 participants completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire revealed that the five-year complication rate (42.42%) was the most important attribute, followed by cost (20.43%), five-year survival rate (14.23%), treatment time (13.44%), and treatment procedure (9.49%). Participants were willing to pay RMB$11076.2 (USD$1,772.2) to obtain a 10% extra reduction in the five-year complication rate, and RMB$7434.6 (USD$1,189.5) for a non-invasive treatment.

Conclusion: In the ranking of the relative importance of key factors affecting single missing tooth restoration, complication rates are most highly valued, suggesting that reducing the complication rate is a key issue to be addressed in prosthodontics. In addition, deriving the ranking of patients' concerns about key factors can help to improve doctor-patient communication and provide a reference for treatment technology development and medical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国患者对单颗缺牙治疗的偏好:离散选择实验。
目的:修复单个缺失牙时,提供给患者的主要治疗方案包括牙支撑三单元固定局部义齿(fpd)和种植支撑单冠(ISCs)。然而,由于目前研究的异质性,很难客观地比较这两种治疗策略。在这项研究中,离散选择实验(DCE)被用来量化个体的偏好进行修复治疗的单个牙齿脱落。患者和方法:DCE问卷以“滚雪球”的方式分发,数据收集自18-60岁的参与者。选择治疗的5个重要属性:(1)治疗程序,(2)治疗时间,(3)费用,(4)5年生存率,(5)5年并发症发生率。采用条件logit模型确定了参与者对特定属性水平的偏好方向,并通过边际效用原理推导出了参与者的支付意愿。结果:287名参与者完成问卷调查。问卷调查结果显示,5年并发症发生率(42.42%)是最重要的因素,其次是费用(20.43%)、5年生存率(14.23%)、治疗时间(13.44%)和治疗方式(9.49%)。参与者愿意支付11076.2元人民币(1772.2美元)来获得5年并发症发生率额外降低10%,并愿意支付7434.6元人民币(1189.5美元)来获得非侵入性治疗。结论:在影响单缺牙修复的关键因素的相对重要性排序中,并发症发生率最为重要,提示降低并发症发生率是修复学需要解决的关键问题。此外,得出患者对关键因素的关注程度排序,有助于改善医患沟通,为治疗技术开发和医疗决策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Gender Preferences in Healthcare: A Study of Saudi Patients' Physician Preferences. The Lived Experience of Adult Cancer Survivors After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Qualitative Study From Saudi Arabia. Barriers to Adherence to Standard of Care in Appalachia: A Qualitative Assessment in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Developing and Validating a Novel Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure - Postoperative Recovery Scale for Adult (PRSA): A Prospective Observational Study. Preferences and Attitudes Towards Digital Communication and Symptom Reporting Methods in Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1