Reasons behind the rise in involuntary psychiatric treatment under mental health act 2016, Queensland, Australia - Clinician perspectives.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102061
Kimbali Wild, Jappan Sawhney, Marianne Wyder, Bernadette Sebar, Neeraj Gill
{"title":"Reasons behind the rise in involuntary psychiatric treatment under mental health act 2016, Queensland, Australia - Clinician perspectives.","authors":"Kimbali Wild, Jappan Sawhney, Marianne Wyder, Bernadette Sebar, Neeraj Gill","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite legislative reform to promote less restrictive treatment options, the rates of involuntary psychiatric treatment in Queensland, Australia continue to rise. This paper aims to investigate mental health clinicians' perspectives of reasons behind the high and increasing rates of involuntary psychiatric treatment in Queensland.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative methodology was used to explore clinician perspectives by facilitating two face-to-face focus groups. Purposive sampling was used to select clinicians of multiple disciplines from inpatient and community adult mental health teams. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to analyse and interpret data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The findings suggested a broad consensus that involuntary treatment is over-utilised in public mental health services. Six main themes were identified, including risk aversion, systemic service deficiencies, lack of voluntary alternatives, increased substance use in the community, legislative and policy shortcomings, and barriers to enacting criteria in the legislation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper highlights that legislative reform alone will be ineffective in reducing involuntary psychiatric treatment, and adequate resources, training, policy and culture change are necessary for successful implementation of less restrictive practices. The reforms require reorientation of the implementation of policy, as well as legislation to align the Queensland mental health system within a human rights framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"102061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite legislative reform to promote less restrictive treatment options, the rates of involuntary psychiatric treatment in Queensland, Australia continue to rise. This paper aims to investigate mental health clinicians' perspectives of reasons behind the high and increasing rates of involuntary psychiatric treatment in Queensland.

Method: Qualitative methodology was used to explore clinician perspectives by facilitating two face-to-face focus groups. Purposive sampling was used to select clinicians of multiple disciplines from inpatient and community adult mental health teams. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to analyse and interpret data.

Findings: The findings suggested a broad consensus that involuntary treatment is over-utilised in public mental health services. Six main themes were identified, including risk aversion, systemic service deficiencies, lack of voluntary alternatives, increased substance use in the community, legislative and policy shortcomings, and barriers to enacting criteria in the legislation.

Conclusion: This paper highlights that legislative reform alone will be ineffective in reducing involuntary psychiatric treatment, and adequate resources, training, policy and culture change are necessary for successful implementation of less restrictive practices. The reforms require reorientation of the implementation of policy, as well as legislation to align the Queensland mental health system within a human rights framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016年澳大利亚昆士兰州《精神卫生法》规定的非自愿精神治疗增加的原因——临床医生的观点。
目的:尽管立法改革促进较少限制的治疗方案,非自愿精神病治疗率在昆士兰州,澳大利亚继续上升。本文旨在调查心理健康临床医生对昆士兰州非自愿精神治疗率高且不断上升的原因的看法。方法:采用定性方法,通过两组面对面的焦点小组探讨临床医生的观点。采用目的抽样的方法,从住院和社区成人心理健康团队中选择多学科的临床医生。利用反身性专题分析来分析和解释数据。研究结果:研究结果表明,在公共精神卫生服务中,非自愿治疗被过度使用是一个广泛的共识。确定了六个主要主题,包括风险规避、系统性服务缺陷、缺乏自愿替代品、社区药物使用增加、立法和政策缺陷以及在立法中制定标准的障碍。结论:本文强调,仅靠立法改革在减少非自愿精神科治疗方面是无效的,充分的资源、培训、政策和文化变革是成功实施限制性较低做法的必要条件。改革需要重新调整政策的执行方向,并通过立法使昆士兰州精神卫生系统在人权框架内保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Coercive measures in disability and mental health care services: Mechanical restraints from a bioethical and legal perspective in Spain. Is this an underestimated problem? Using coercion before psychiatric hospitalization. The use of community treatment orders in people with substance induced psychosis. No man's land: Troubling the borders of mental health and capacity law. Reasons behind the rise in involuntary psychiatric treatment under mental health act 2016, Queensland, Australia - Clinician perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1