#PorkandPigs: an online media listening analysis of public perception of the U.S. swine industry.

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae155
Alexandra E Fisk, Michael L Smith, Brian T Richert, Nicole J Olynk Widmar
{"title":"#PorkandPigs: an online media listening analysis of public perception of the U.S. swine industry.","authors":"Alexandra E Fisk, Michael L Smith, Brian T Richert, Nicole J Olynk Widmar","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the majority of the U.S. swine industry being generally bounded by social licensing, there is a growing need to understand social perspectives to better adapt to consumer demands. Online and social media data are rich datasets that researchers are leveraging to tackle economic and societal challenges. The information that can be gleaned from online media regarding public perceptions makes it an important tool for producers to understand driving topics of interest to the public. This study utilized a prominent online and social media listening and data analytics platform to identify and quantify online and social media mentions related to the U.S. swine industry from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023. A general search for online media referencing pork and pigs was designed resulting in a total of 41,093,309 mentions. The search was further queried to specific topics of food and cooking (20,580,068 mentions), price (2,866,548 mentions), welfare (1,615,208 mentions), sustainability (771,819 mentions), and top authors/organizations within the U.S. swine industry (1,430 mentions). The study spanned the geographic locations of the overall US (including U.S. Minor Outlying Islands), the top 5 most populous states, and the top 5 pork-producing states as of 2024. Of all mentions, X/Twitter was the largest domain for nearly all mentions related to pork and pigs. Major organizations designed to spread information between the general public and pork producers had a minor impact on the overall conversation and no online media presence in the top 5 most populous states. Net sentiment was overall positive across all 4 yr and all geographies except for major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the H1N1 Swine Flu, the passing of California Proposition 12, environmental events, and inflation-associated pork prices. Overall, most media presence had positive net sentiments and with most interest surrounding ways to cook pork and how to keep bacon cheap. Understanding public perceptions of the U.S. swine industry provides the opportunity to make informed decisions on marketing strategies and production practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"8 ","pages":"txae155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the majority of the U.S. swine industry being generally bounded by social licensing, there is a growing need to understand social perspectives to better adapt to consumer demands. Online and social media data are rich datasets that researchers are leveraging to tackle economic and societal challenges. The information that can be gleaned from online media regarding public perceptions makes it an important tool for producers to understand driving topics of interest to the public. This study utilized a prominent online and social media listening and data analytics platform to identify and quantify online and social media mentions related to the U.S. swine industry from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023. A general search for online media referencing pork and pigs was designed resulting in a total of 41,093,309 mentions. The search was further queried to specific topics of food and cooking (20,580,068 mentions), price (2,866,548 mentions), welfare (1,615,208 mentions), sustainability (771,819 mentions), and top authors/organizations within the U.S. swine industry (1,430 mentions). The study spanned the geographic locations of the overall US (including U.S. Minor Outlying Islands), the top 5 most populous states, and the top 5 pork-producing states as of 2024. Of all mentions, X/Twitter was the largest domain for nearly all mentions related to pork and pigs. Major organizations designed to spread information between the general public and pork producers had a minor impact on the overall conversation and no online media presence in the top 5 most populous states. Net sentiment was overall positive across all 4 yr and all geographies except for major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the H1N1 Swine Flu, the passing of California Proposition 12, environmental events, and inflation-associated pork prices. Overall, most media presence had positive net sentiments and with most interest surrounding ways to cook pork and how to keep bacon cheap. Understanding public perceptions of the U.S. swine industry provides the opportunity to make informed decisions on marketing strategies and production practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#PorkandPigs:一个在线媒体对公众对美国养猪业看法的倾听分析。
由于大多数美国养猪业通常受到社会许可的限制,因此越来越需要了解社会观点,以更好地适应消费者的需求。在线和社交媒体数据是丰富的数据集,研究人员正在利用这些数据集来应对经济和社会挑战。可以从网络媒体收集到的有关公众看法的信息,使其成为制片人了解公众感兴趣的驱动话题的重要工具。本研究利用一个著名的在线和社交媒体倾听和数据分析平台,识别和量化了2020年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间与美国养猪业相关的在线和社交媒体提及。对涉及猪肉和猪的网络媒体进行一般搜索,总共得到41,093,309次提及。搜索结果进一步被查询到具体的主题,如食品和烹饪(20,580,068次提及),价格(2,866,548次提及),福利(1,615,208次提及),可持续性(771,819次提及),以及美国养猪业的顶级作者/组织(1,430次提及)。该研究涵盖了整个美国(包括美国小离岛)的地理位置,截至2024年,人口最多的5个州和最大的5个猪肉生产州。在所有提及中,X/Twitter是几乎所有与猪肉和猪有关的提及的最大域名。旨在在公众和猪肉生产商之间传播信息的主要组织对整体对话的影响较小,并且在人口最多的5个州中没有在线媒体存在。除了2019冠状病毒病大流行、H1N1猪流感、加州12号提案通过、环境事件和与通货膨胀相关的猪肉价格等重大事件外,所有四年和所有地区的净情绪总体上都是积极的。总体而言,大多数媒体的净情绪都是正面的,他们最感兴趣的是如何烹饪猪肉和如何保持培根的便宜。了解公众对美国养猪业的看法提供了在营销策略和生产实践方面做出明智决策的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
期刊最新文献
Potential of accelerometers to remotely early detect bovine ephemeral fever in cattle using pattern mining. Effect of beta-agonist type and timing of Experior feeding on calculated cumulative ammonia gas emissions, live growth performance, and carcass outcomes, and objective tenderness outcomes of feedlot steers. Gastrointestinal parasitic worm burdens and efficacy of deworming practices in growing beef cattle grazing California pastures. Effects of milk replacer composition on growth and development of beef × dairy crossbred calves. Maintained growth performance and reduced mortality of genetically resistant nursery pigs after an experimental virulent F18 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1