Strip grazing stockpiled annual forages: impact on carrying capacity and cattle performance.

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae159
Shelby L Davies-Jenkins, Devin A Jakub, Abigail M Sartin, Zac E Carlson, Mary E Drewnoski
{"title":"Strip grazing stockpiled annual forages: impact on carrying capacity and cattle performance.","authors":"Shelby L Davies-Jenkins, Devin A Jakub, Abigail M Sartin, Zac E Carlson, Mary E Drewnoski","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Strip grazing can increase forage utilization, though it has been shown to decrease individual animal performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate forage utilization and cattle performance when strip grazing (<b>STRIP</b>) vs. continuously grazing (<b>CONT</b>) stockpiled annual forages. Experiment 1 consisted of a mix of Jerry oats (<i>Avena sativa</i>) and Trophy rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i>) while experiment 2 was a 17-species mix in which the forage mass was predominantly pearl millet (<i>Pennisetum glaucum</i>), German millet (<i>Setaria italica</i>), and browntop millet (<i>Urochloa ramosa</i>). Fields were divided into six 6.3-ha (experiment 1) or 4.1-ha (experiment 2) paddocks which were blocked by location. Treatment was randomly assigned within block (<i>n</i> = 3 replicates per treatment per experiment). Grazing was initiated in November and terminated in February. This resulted in a total of 83 and 54 grazing days for experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Forage was allocated to STRIP twice a week. The STRIP steers gained 16% less (<i>P </i>= 0.01) per day in experiment 1, but in experiment 2, there was no difference (<i>P </i>= 0.56) between treatments. Compared to CONT, the carrying capacity (AUM/ha) of STRIP was increased (<i>P </i>= 0.03) by 81% in experiment 1 and tended to increase (<i>P</i> = 0.10) in experiment 2. Gain per hectare increased (<i>P</i> = 0.02) for STRIP by 56% in experiment 1 and by 31% in experiment 2. Strip grazing stockpiled annual forages can be an effective way to increase carrying capacity and gain per hectare during the fall and winter months but effects on individual animal performance are inconsistent. Disparities in response to strip grazing could stem from differences in forage quality and allocation. Further research is needed to refine and optimize the utilization of this management approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"8 ","pages":"txae159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strip grazing can increase forage utilization, though it has been shown to decrease individual animal performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate forage utilization and cattle performance when strip grazing (STRIP) vs. continuously grazing (CONT) stockpiled annual forages. Experiment 1 consisted of a mix of Jerry oats (Avena sativa) and Trophy rapeseed (Brassica napus) while experiment 2 was a 17-species mix in which the forage mass was predominantly pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), German millet (Setaria italica), and browntop millet (Urochloa ramosa). Fields were divided into six 6.3-ha (experiment 1) or 4.1-ha (experiment 2) paddocks which were blocked by location. Treatment was randomly assigned within block (n = 3 replicates per treatment per experiment). Grazing was initiated in November and terminated in February. This resulted in a total of 83 and 54 grazing days for experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Forage was allocated to STRIP twice a week. The STRIP steers gained 16% less (P = 0.01) per day in experiment 1, but in experiment 2, there was no difference (P = 0.56) between treatments. Compared to CONT, the carrying capacity (AUM/ha) of STRIP was increased (P = 0.03) by 81% in experiment 1 and tended to increase (P = 0.10) in experiment 2. Gain per hectare increased (P = 0.02) for STRIP by 56% in experiment 1 and by 31% in experiment 2. Strip grazing stockpiled annual forages can be an effective way to increase carrying capacity and gain per hectare during the fall and winter months but effects on individual animal performance are inconsistent. Disparities in response to strip grazing could stem from differences in forage quality and allocation. Further research is needed to refine and optimize the utilization of this management approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带状放牧蓄积一年生牧草:对承载力和牛生产性能的影响。
带状放牧可以提高饲料利用率,但已证明会降低动物个体生产性能。本研究的目的是评价带状放牧(strip)和连续放牧(CONT)储存一年生牧草时的饲料利用率和牛的生产性能。试验1为燕麦(Avena sativa)与Trophy油菜籽(Brassica napus)混合饲喂,试验2为17种混合饲喂,以珍珠粟(Pennisetum glaucum)、德国粟(Setaria italica)和褐顶粟(Urochloa ramosa)为主。将田间分为6个6.3 ha(试验1)或4.1 ha(试验2)的围场,并按位置封锁。处理随机分组(每个试验每个处理n = 3个重复)。放牧开始于11月,结束于2月。试验1和试验2的放牧天数分别为83天和54天。草料每周分配给STRIP两次。在实验1中,STRIP犬每天的增重减少了16% (P = 0.01),但在实验2中,处理之间没有差异(P = 0.56)。与CONT相比,STRIP的承载力(AUM/ha)在试验1中提高了81% (P = 0.03),在试验2中有增加的趋势(P = 0.10)。试验1和试验2的每公顷增收分别提高56%和31% (P = 0.02)。在秋冬季节,带状放牧储存一年生牧草可以有效地提高承载能力和每公顷产量,但对个体动物生产性能的影响并不一致。对带状放牧的响应差异可能源于饲料质量和分配的差异。需要进一步的研究来完善和优化这种管理方法的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
期刊最新文献
Potential of accelerometers to remotely early detect bovine ephemeral fever in cattle using pattern mining. Effect of beta-agonist type and timing of Experior feeding on calculated cumulative ammonia gas emissions, live growth performance, and carcass outcomes, and objective tenderness outcomes of feedlot steers. Gastrointestinal parasitic worm burdens and efficacy of deworming practices in growing beef cattle grazing California pastures. Effects of milk replacer composition on growth and development of beef × dairy crossbred calves. Maintained growth performance and reduced mortality of genetically resistant nursery pigs after an experimental virulent F18 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1