Associations between spatial skills and physics knowledge in primary school: Spatial skills are more important for conceptual scientific knowledge than for factual scientific knowledge.

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106135
Alex Hodgkiss, Michael S C Thomas, Andrew K Tolmie, Emily K Farran
{"title":"Associations between spatial skills and physics knowledge in primary school: Spatial skills are more important for conceptual scientific knowledge than for factual scientific knowledge.","authors":"Alex Hodgkiss, Michael S C Thomas, Andrew K Tolmie, Emily K Farran","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research demonstrates an association between spatial ability and science achievement in primary-school-aged children. However, little is known about the mechanisms driving this relationship. We investigated the associations between children's spatial skills and components of physics learning (factual knowledge vs. conceptual knowledge [predictions and explanations]). Participants (N = 103; mean age = 9.6 years) completed a set of spatial tasks based on the \"2 × 2\" (intrinsic-extrinsic; static-dynamic) model of spatial cognition. They also participated in a whole-class science lesson about sound, followed by an assessment of science knowledge. After controlling for vocabulary and prior knowledge, spatial ability was not associated with factual knowledge scores. However, spatial skills were significantly associated with predictions and explanations; the association was stronger for explanations than for predictions and was driven by intrinsic-dynamic spatial skills. Findings demonstrate that spatial skills are more important for conceptual scientific knowledge than for factual scientific knowledge and further suggest that spatial intervention studies designed to enhance children's science learning should target intrinsic-dynamic spatial skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"252 ","pages":"106135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates an association between spatial ability and science achievement in primary-school-aged children. However, little is known about the mechanisms driving this relationship. We investigated the associations between children's spatial skills and components of physics learning (factual knowledge vs. conceptual knowledge [predictions and explanations]). Participants (N = 103; mean age = 9.6 years) completed a set of spatial tasks based on the "2 × 2" (intrinsic-extrinsic; static-dynamic) model of spatial cognition. They also participated in a whole-class science lesson about sound, followed by an assessment of science knowledge. After controlling for vocabulary and prior knowledge, spatial ability was not associated with factual knowledge scores. However, spatial skills were significantly associated with predictions and explanations; the association was stronger for explanations than for predictions and was driven by intrinsic-dynamic spatial skills. Findings demonstrate that spatial skills are more important for conceptual scientific knowledge than for factual scientific knowledge and further suggest that spatial intervention studies designed to enhance children's science learning should target intrinsic-dynamic spatial skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间技能与小学物理知识的关系:空间技能对概念性科学知识的重要性大于对事实性科学知识的重要性。
先前的研究表明,空间能力与小学学龄儿童的科学成就之间存在关联。然而,人们对这种关系背后的机制知之甚少。我们调查了儿童空间技能与物理学习组成部分(事实知识与概念知识[预测和解释])之间的关系。参与者(N = 103;平均年龄9.6岁)完成一组基于“2 × 2”的空间任务(内在-外在;静态-动态)空间认知模型。他们还参加了一堂关于声音的科学课,随后是对科学知识的评估。在控制词汇量和先验知识后,空间能力与事实知识得分无关。然而,空间技能与预测和解释显著相关;这种关联在解释方面比预测方面更强,并且是由内在动态空间技能驱动的。研究结果表明,空间技能对概念性科学知识的学习比对事实性科学知识的学习更重要,进一步表明旨在提高儿童科学学习的空间干预研究应以内在动态空间技能为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
The relation of verbal and nonverbal skills to basic numerical processing of preterm versus term-born preschoolers. Do children match described probabilities? The sampling hypothesis applied to repeated risky choice. Can gamification improve children's performance in mental rotation? Examining the factor structure of the home learning environment. Parental mathematics anxiety is related to children's mathematical development in preschool and the first school years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1