Reasons for seeking internet-delivered treatment for individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12524
Maral Melkonian, Sarah McDonald, Eyal Karin, Nickolai Titov, Blake F Dear, Bethany M Wootton
{"title":"Reasons for seeking internet-delivered treatment for individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder.","authors":"Maral Melkonian, Sarah McDonald, Eyal Karin, Nickolai Titov, Blake F Dear, Bethany M Wootton","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) face multiple barriers when accessing treatment and rarely receive best-practice cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) when they seek help. Remote treatments, such as internet-delivered CBT (ICBT), enhance access to evidence-based treatments. To date, no known studies have examined the reasons individuals seek remote treatment over traditional in-person treatment for OCD. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine the treatment histories of individuals who completed ICBT for OCD and their reasons for seeking ICBT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and sixty-six participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 33.88; SD = 13.41, 71.7% female) were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost three-quarters of the sample had previously spoken to a health professional about their OCD symptoms. General practitioners were the most frequently consulted health professionals initially (41.7%), while psychologists were the most frequently consulted overall (81.7%). Supportive counselling (74.2%) and medication (72.5%) were the most common forms of treatment ever received. Of those who had received CBT for OCD, only 20.0% (12.5% of the overall sample) likely received best-practice CBT. The most frequently endorsed reasons for seeking ICBT over in-person treatment related to having no access to face-to-face treatment in the community (25.9%) and having found previous face-to-face treatment unhelpful (24.1%). Group differences in reasons for seeking ICBT over face-to-face treatment emerged based on geographical location, OCD severity and presence of comorbid depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence-based treatment for OCD is underutilized in the community highlighting the need to develop and disseminate evidence-based remote treatments for OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) face multiple barriers when accessing treatment and rarely receive best-practice cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) when they seek help. Remote treatments, such as internet-delivered CBT (ICBT), enhance access to evidence-based treatments. To date, no known studies have examined the reasons individuals seek remote treatment over traditional in-person treatment for OCD. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine the treatment histories of individuals who completed ICBT for OCD and their reasons for seeking ICBT.

Methods: One hundred and sixty-six participants (Mage = 33.88; SD = 13.41, 71.7% female) were included in the study.

Results: Almost three-quarters of the sample had previously spoken to a health professional about their OCD symptoms. General practitioners were the most frequently consulted health professionals initially (41.7%), while psychologists were the most frequently consulted overall (81.7%). Supportive counselling (74.2%) and medication (72.5%) were the most common forms of treatment ever received. Of those who had received CBT for OCD, only 20.0% (12.5% of the overall sample) likely received best-practice CBT. The most frequently endorsed reasons for seeking ICBT over in-person treatment related to having no access to face-to-face treatment in the community (25.9%) and having found previous face-to-face treatment unhelpful (24.1%). Group differences in reasons for seeking ICBT over face-to-face treatment emerged based on geographical location, OCD severity and presence of comorbid depressive symptoms.

Conclusions: Evidence-based treatment for OCD is underutilized in the community highlighting the need to develop and disseminate evidence-based remote treatments for OCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
期刊最新文献
Reasons for seeking internet-delivered treatment for individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Patient experiences of behavioural therapy for bipolar depression: A qualitative study. Direct and indirect effects of childhood adversity on psychopathology: Investigating parallel mediation via self-concept clarity, self-esteem and intolerance of uncertainty. Experiences of imagery in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Heterogeneous experiences of people with bipolar disorder during euthymia: Profiles of global remission and personal recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1