Fasciocutaneous SMAS Island Flap for Large Facial Defect Reconstruction.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194
Simon J Madorsky, Jonah S Brand, Orr A Meltzer
{"title":"Fasciocutaneous SMAS Island Flap for Large Facial Defect Reconstruction.","authors":"Simon J Madorsky, Jonah S Brand, Orr A Meltzer","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Large cutaneous defects of the face have traditionally been reconstructed with cervicofacial rotation flaps. <b>Objective:</b> To measure advancing distance and assess vascular reliability of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) island flaps for reconstruction of large cutaneous facial defects. <b>Methods:</b> The study design was a retrospective case series of all patients who had undergone reconstruction of facial defects 3 cm or greater with fasciocutaneous SMAS island flaps from 2009 to 2023. Flap advancing distance and vascular compromise were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The average patient age at the time of surgery was 69 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years with more males (<i>n</i> = 33, 92%) than females (<i>n</i> = 3, 8%). Of 36 patients, 18 had posterior defects, 16 had anterior defects, and 2 had defects straddling both regions. Fifteen cases had a full fasciocutaneous SMAS island flap, and 21 underwent the partial island modification. Flap ischemia occurred in three cases (8%). The mean flap advancing distance was 3.8 cm (SD 1.1). Of the 5 smokers, none had ischemia of the flap. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range 12-3,170 days). <b>Conclusions:</b> Fasciocutaneous SMAS island and partial island flaps are reliable options for the reconstruction of large cheek defects (3 cm or greater). Anterior pedicle blood supply is more reliable for defects anterior to the line from the lateral brow to the angle of the mandible, whereas the posterior pedicle is a better choice for defects posterior to that line.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large cutaneous defects of the face have traditionally been reconstructed with cervicofacial rotation flaps. Objective: To measure advancing distance and assess vascular reliability of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) island flaps for reconstruction of large cutaneous facial defects. Methods: The study design was a retrospective case series of all patients who had undergone reconstruction of facial defects 3 cm or greater with fasciocutaneous SMAS island flaps from 2009 to 2023. Flap advancing distance and vascular compromise were analyzed. Results: The average patient age at the time of surgery was 69 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years with more males (n = 33, 92%) than females (n = 3, 8%). Of 36 patients, 18 had posterior defects, 16 had anterior defects, and 2 had defects straddling both regions. Fifteen cases had a full fasciocutaneous SMAS island flap, and 21 underwent the partial island modification. Flap ischemia occurred in three cases (8%). The mean flap advancing distance was 3.8 cm (SD 1.1). Of the 5 smokers, none had ischemia of the flap. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range 12-3,170 days). Conclusions: Fasciocutaneous SMAS island and partial island flaps are reliable options for the reconstruction of large cheek defects (3 cm or greater). Anterior pedicle blood supply is more reliable for defects anterior to the line from the lateral brow to the angle of the mandible, whereas the posterior pedicle is a better choice for defects posterior to that line.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筋膜皮肤SMAS岛状皮瓣修复大面积面部缺损。
背景:传统上使用颈面旋转皮瓣重建面部大面积皮肤缺损。目的:评价浅表肌筋膜系统岛状皮瓣修复面部大面积皮肤缺损的推进距离和血管可靠性。方法:回顾性分析2009年至2023年所有采用筋膜皮肤SMAS岛状皮瓣修复面部缺损3cm及以上的病例。分析皮瓣推进距离和血管损伤情况。结果:患者手术时的平均年龄为69岁(标准差[SD] 15)岁,男性(n = 33.92%)多于女性(n = 3.8%)。在36例患者中,18例为后侧缺损,16例为前侧缺损,2例为双侧缺损。15例行全筋膜皮肤SMAS岛状皮瓣,21例行部分岛状皮瓣改良。皮瓣缺血3例(8%)。皮瓣推进距离平均3.8 cm (SD 1.1)。5例吸烟者无皮瓣缺血。中位随访时间为2年(12- 3170天)。结论:筋膜皮肤SMAS岛状皮瓣和部分岛状皮瓣是修复较大脸颊缺损(3cm或更大)的可靠选择。前蒂血供对于侧眉至下颌骨角线前的缺损更为可靠,而后蒂血供对于侧眉至下颌骨角线后的缺损则是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Association Between Symptoms of Body Dysmorphia and Social Media Usage: A Cross-Generational Comparison. Maximizing Septal Cartilage and Bone Harvest for Autologous Nasal Septal Grafts in Congenital Cleft Nasal Deformity. Bell's Palsy-Unclear Terminology and Definitions Impede Progress. Dorsal Hump Reduction and Keystone Injury in Human Anatomic Specimens. Effectiveness of Isotretinoin Administration in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1