The efficacy of lower limb orthoses on quality of life, well-being, and participation following stroke: A systematic review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000389
Duarte Caldeira Quaresma, Christine McMonagle
{"title":"The efficacy of lower limb orthoses on quality of life, well-being, and participation following stroke: A systematic review.","authors":"Duarte Caldeira Quaresma, Christine McMonagle","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is the main cause of acquired adult disability globally, with motor impairment affecting 80% of people after stroke. To regain mobility, diminish falls, and improve quality of life (QoL), after a stroke, orthoses are recommended. Most studies, to date, have focused on the positive impact of ankle-foot orthoses on spatial-temporal, kinematic, and kinetic outcomes. The objective of this review is to assess the evidence of the effects of lower-extremity orthoses on perceptions of QoL, psychological well-being, and social participation after stroke. The following databases were used to search the literature: CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed, between 1990 and 2022. Previous reviews and reference lists were also screened. Information on the trial design, sample characteristics, information of orthoses used, outcome measures, and results were extracted. Critical appraisal was conducted using SIGN guidelines. Ten articles were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The effect of orthoses on QoL was inconsistent: 4 articles reported a positive relationship, one found a negative relationship, and 3 did not find any relationship. Six of 7 articles reported a positive relationship between the use of orthoses and psychological well-being and participation, although the level of evidence was low. This literature review has identified a small number of articles addressing the research question. Furthermore, varied study designs, low levels of evidence seen, the variation in follow-up times, and the limited information about the fitting and appropriateness of the orthoses in the studies highlight that more research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke is the main cause of acquired adult disability globally, with motor impairment affecting 80% of people after stroke. To regain mobility, diminish falls, and improve quality of life (QoL), after a stroke, orthoses are recommended. Most studies, to date, have focused on the positive impact of ankle-foot orthoses on spatial-temporal, kinematic, and kinetic outcomes. The objective of this review is to assess the evidence of the effects of lower-extremity orthoses on perceptions of QoL, psychological well-being, and social participation after stroke. The following databases were used to search the literature: CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed, between 1990 and 2022. Previous reviews and reference lists were also screened. Information on the trial design, sample characteristics, information of orthoses used, outcome measures, and results were extracted. Critical appraisal was conducted using SIGN guidelines. Ten articles were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The effect of orthoses on QoL was inconsistent: 4 articles reported a positive relationship, one found a negative relationship, and 3 did not find any relationship. Six of 7 articles reported a positive relationship between the use of orthoses and psychological well-being and participation, although the level of evidence was low. This literature review has identified a small number of articles addressing the research question. Furthermore, varied study designs, low levels of evidence seen, the variation in follow-up times, and the limited information about the fitting and appropriateness of the orthoses in the studies highlight that more research is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢矫形器对中风后生活质量、幸福感和参与的影响:一项系统综述。
中风是全球获得性成人残疾的主要原因,80%的人在中风后会出现运动障碍。为了恢复活动能力,减少跌倒,提高生活质量(QoL),中风后,建议使用矫形器。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在踝足矫形器对时空、运动学和动力学结果的积极影响上。本综述的目的是评估下肢矫形器对中风后生活质量、心理健康和社会参与的影响的证据。使用以下数据库检索1990年至2022年间的文献:CINAHL、EMBASE、Scopus和PubMed。之前的评论和参考书目也被筛选。提取有关试验设计、样本特征、使用矫形器信息、结局测量和结果的信息。使用SIGN指南进行关键评估。10篇文章被确定为符合纳入标准。矫形器对生活质量的影响是不一致的:4篇报道了正相关,1篇报道了负相关,3篇没有发现任何关系。7篇文章中有6篇报道了矫形器的使用与心理健康和参与之间的积极关系,尽管证据水平很低。本文献综述已经确定了少数文章解决研究问题。此外,不同的研究设计,低水平的证据,随访时间的变化,以及研究中关于矫形器的合适性和适当性的有限信息,都表明需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors. Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses on jump landing performance: A systematic review. Which factors may influence medium-term quality of life of patients with lower-limb loss? A systematic review of the literature. What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis. A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1