Outcome reporting in studies on critically ill obstetric patients: A systematic review.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetric Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1177/1753495X241302848

Julien Viau-Lapointe, Julia Kfouri, Mary Thompson, Rizwana Ashraf, Rohan D'Souza, Stephen Lapinsky

{"title":"Outcome reporting in studies on critically ill obstetric patients: A systematic review.","authors":"Julien Viau-Lapointe, Julia Kfouri, Mary Thompson, Rizwana Ashraf, Rohan D'Souza, Stephen Lapinsky","doi":"10.1177/1753495X241302848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This systematic review is the first step in the process of standardizing outcome reporting through the development of a core outcome set for research on critically ill obstetric patients (COSCO).Methods: A five-database search was performed to identify randomized and non-randomized studies published before November 2017, on patients admitted to intensive care or high-dependency units during or immediately after pregnancy. Reported outcomes were categorized into domains and definitions were documented.Results: Of the 12,581 citations reviewed, 136 studies were included. The most reported outcome domains were maternal all-cause mortality (n = 128, 94.5%), resource use (n = 116, 85.6%), and clinical/physiological outcomes (n = 111, 82.8%). Outcomes related to functioning/life impact and adverse effects of treatment were only reported in four (2.9%) studies. There was inconsistency in outcome definitions.Conclusions: This review identified considerable variation in outcome reporting and definitions and generated an outcome list to consider in COSCO development.","PeriodicalId":51717,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1753495X241302848"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X241302848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review is the first step in the process of standardizing outcome reporting through the development of a core outcome set for research on critically ill obstetric patients (COSCO).

Methods: A five-database search was performed to identify randomized and non-randomized studies published before November 2017, on patients admitted to intensive care or high-dependency units during or immediately after pregnancy. Reported outcomes were categorized into domains and definitions were documented.

Results: Of the 12,581 citations reviewed, 136 studies were included. The most reported outcome domains were maternal all-cause mortality (n = 128, 94.5%), resource use (n = 116, 85.6%), and clinical/physiological outcomes (n = 111, 82.8%). Outcomes related to functioning/life impact and adverse effects of treatment were only reported in four (2.9%) studies. There was inconsistency in outcome definitions.

Conclusions: This review identified considerable variation in outcome reporting and definitions and generated an outcome list to consider in COSCO development.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

危重产科患者研究结果报告：系统回顾

本系统综述是通过制定产科危重患者（COSCO）研究的核心结果集来标准化结果报告过程的第一步。方法：对五个数据库进行检索，以确定2017年11月之前发表的随机和非随机研究，这些研究涉及妊娠期间或妊娠后立即入住重症监护或高依赖性病房的患者。报告的结果被分类到不同的领域，定义被记录下来。结果：在12581篇文献引用中，136篇研究被纳入。报告最多的结果域是孕产妇全因死亡率（n = 128, 94.5%）、资源利用（n = 116, 85.6%）和临床/生理结果（n = 111, 82.8%）。仅在4项（2.9%）研究中报告了与功能/生活影响和治疗不良反应相关的结果。结果定义不一致。结论：本综述发现在结果报告和定义方面存在相当大的差异，并生成了一份结果清单，以供中远发展考虑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Obstetric Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量