Optimizing genetic testing strategy for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis: effective solutions in public health systems.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03811-y
Natalia García-Simón, Fátima Valentín, Ana Royuela, Beatriz Hidalgo-Calero, Ricardo Blázquez-Martín, Montserrat de-Miguel-Reyes, José María Sánchez-Zapardiel, Luisa Adán-Merino, Alejandro Rodríguez-Festa, Patricia Gallego-Gil, Pilar Mediavilla-Medel, Laura Quiñonero-Moreno, Lourdes Gutiérrez, Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada, Antonio Sánchez, Mariano Provencio, Atocha Romero
{"title":"Optimizing genetic testing strategy for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis: effective solutions in public health systems.","authors":"Natalia García-Simón, Fátima Valentín, Ana Royuela, Beatriz Hidalgo-Calero, Ricardo Blázquez-Martín, Montserrat de-Miguel-Reyes, José María Sánchez-Zapardiel, Luisa Adán-Merino, Alejandro Rodríguez-Festa, Patricia Gallego-Gil, Pilar Mediavilla-Medel, Laura Quiñonero-Moreno, Lourdes Gutiérrez, Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada, Antonio Sánchez, Mariano Provencio, Atocha Romero","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03811-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>APC and MUTYH genes are key in hereditary attenuated adenomatous polyposis syndromes. Guidelines recommend genetic testing based on polyp count, often overlooking age despite its impact on polyp prevalence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To enhance genetic testing strategies for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis by combining polyp count and age in a probability calculator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of adult patients referred to NGS genetic testing for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis (accumulated history of < 100 adenomas) (discovery cohort, N = 138). Data included age, adenoma count, and test results. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to associate positive genetic test results with age and adenoma count. The model was externally validated with 259 patients from two tertiary hospitals in our region (validation cohort, N = 259).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the discovery cohort, 13 (9.4%) patients had pathogenic mutations, being younger (OR:0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.96) and having more adenomas (OR:1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13) compared to negative cases. The logistic regression model combining age and polyp count demonstrated an AUC of 0.92. Using a cutoff probability of 3.5%, the model achieved 100% sensitivity and 58% specificity in identifying positive cases. In the external validation, the model accurately predicted 14 out of 16 positive cases (88%). The remaining two positive cases were a patient with an AXIN2 mutation in heterozygosis, and a patient with a NTHL1 mutation in homozygosis. Performance evaluation of both hospitals yielded AUC values of 0.77 and 0.90.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older individuals with fewer polyps are less likely have hereditary syndromes. Including age in genetic testing criteria can enhance patient selection and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03811-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: APC and MUTYH genes are key in hereditary attenuated adenomatous polyposis syndromes. Guidelines recommend genetic testing based on polyp count, often overlooking age despite its impact on polyp prevalence.

Aim: To enhance genetic testing strategies for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis by combining polyp count and age in a probability calculator.

Methods: Retrospective study of adult patients referred to NGS genetic testing for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis (accumulated history of < 100 adenomas) (discovery cohort, N = 138). Data included age, adenoma count, and test results. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to associate positive genetic test results with age and adenoma count. The model was externally validated with 259 patients from two tertiary hospitals in our region (validation cohort, N = 259).

Results: In the discovery cohort, 13 (9.4%) patients had pathogenic mutations, being younger (OR:0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.96) and having more adenomas (OR:1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13) compared to negative cases. The logistic regression model combining age and polyp count demonstrated an AUC of 0.92. Using a cutoff probability of 3.5%, the model achieved 100% sensitivity and 58% specificity in identifying positive cases. In the external validation, the model accurately predicted 14 out of 16 positive cases (88%). The remaining two positive cases were a patient with an AXIN2 mutation in heterozygosis, and a patient with a NTHL1 mutation in homozygosis. Performance evaluation of both hospitals yielded AUC values of 0.77 and 0.90.

Conclusions: Older individuals with fewer polyps are less likely have hereditary syndromes. Including age in genetic testing criteria can enhance patient selection and cost-effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化疑似减毒性腺瘤性息肉病的基因检测策略:公共卫生系统中的有效解决方案。
背景:APC和MUTYH基因是遗传性减毒性腺瘤性息肉病综合征的关键基因。指南建议基于息肉计数进行基因检测,尽管年龄对息肉患病率有影响,但通常忽略了年龄。目的:在概率计算器中结合息肉数和年龄,提高疑似减毒性腺瘤性息肉病的基因检测策略。方法:对NGS基因检测疑似减毒性腺瘤性息肉病的成年患者进行回顾性研究(累积病史):在发现队列中,13例(9.4%)患者有致病性突变,与阴性病例相比,年龄更小(OR:0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.96),腺瘤发生率更高(OR:1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13)。结合年龄和息肉计数的logistic回归模型显示AUC为0.92。使用3.5%的截止概率,该模型在识别阳性病例时达到100%的敏感性和58%的特异性。在外部验证中,该模型准确预测了16例阳性病例中的14例(88%)。其余两例阳性病例为杂合子AXIN2突变患者和纯合子NTHL1突变患者。两家医院绩效评价的AUC分别为0.77和0.90。结论:息肉较少的老年人患遗传性综合征的可能性较小。将年龄纳入基因检测标准可以提高患者选择和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Association of albumin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocytes with clinical stage in cervical cancer patients. Low dose of dexamethasone combined with netupitant and palonosetron in preventing nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients induced by anthracycline drugs. Malignant melanoma in Portuguese adult population: a scoping review of the real-world evidence. The effect of BMI on survival outcome of breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The expression of ERAP1 is favorable for the prognosis and immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: a study based on the bioinformatic and immunohistochemical analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1