Afsoon Sabet, Meg Kilgore, Jerome Goddard, Samuel F Ward
{"title":"Drivers of behavior in two tick species, <i>Amblyomma americanum</i> and <i>Amblyomma maculatum</i> (Acari: Ixodidae), in a laboratory setting.","authors":"Afsoon Sabet, Meg Kilgore, Jerome Goddard, Samuel F Ward","doi":"10.52707/1081-1710-50-1-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ticks and tick-borne diseases are of increasing concern in the United States, and understanding tick behavior could be crucial to limiting the exposure of humans and other animals to ticks. Here, we wanted to understand the drivers of questing and burrowing in <i>Amblyomma americanum</i> and <i>A. maculatum</i>. We used a factorial design to assess the effects of substrate (sand, soil, and rock), temperature (16° and 22° C), tick species (<i>A. maculatum</i> and <i>A. americanum</i>), and competition (homogenous or heterogenous mixture of ticks in the arena) on tick behavior in laboratory arenas. Questing varied significantly between tick species, with 61% of <i>A. americanum</i> questing compared to 35% of <i>A. maculatum</i>. Substrate similarly affected questing, with most ticks questing in the arenas with sand (83%) compared to arenas with rock (35%) or soil (25%). Burrowing behavior was also influenced by substrate; every tick in the arenas with rock (100%) and nearly all in the arenas with soil (98%) exhibited burrowing, whereas only 10% burrowed in sand. <i>A. americanum</i> traveled longer distances than <i>A. maculatum</i> (23 ± 2.8 cm vs 9.7 ± 2.3 cm). The disparity in laboratory behavior between sand and rock/soil substrates might warrant further consideration in a field setting, as understanding factors that inhibit host-seeking behaviors of ticks can inform management of public spaces and potentially help mitigate tick-exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":56065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vector Ecology","volume":"50 1","pages":"14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vector Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52707/1081-1710-50-1-14","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ticks and tick-borne diseases are of increasing concern in the United States, and understanding tick behavior could be crucial to limiting the exposure of humans and other animals to ticks. Here, we wanted to understand the drivers of questing and burrowing in Amblyomma americanum and A. maculatum. We used a factorial design to assess the effects of substrate (sand, soil, and rock), temperature (16° and 22° C), tick species (A. maculatum and A. americanum), and competition (homogenous or heterogenous mixture of ticks in the arena) on tick behavior in laboratory arenas. Questing varied significantly between tick species, with 61% of A. americanum questing compared to 35% of A. maculatum. Substrate similarly affected questing, with most ticks questing in the arenas with sand (83%) compared to arenas with rock (35%) or soil (25%). Burrowing behavior was also influenced by substrate; every tick in the arenas with rock (100%) and nearly all in the arenas with soil (98%) exhibited burrowing, whereas only 10% burrowed in sand. A. americanum traveled longer distances than A. maculatum (23 ± 2.8 cm vs 9.7 ± 2.3 cm). The disparity in laboratory behavior between sand and rock/soil substrates might warrant further consideration in a field setting, as understanding factors that inhibit host-seeking behaviors of ticks can inform management of public spaces and potentially help mitigate tick-exposure.
蜱虫和蜱虫传播的疾病在美国越来越受到关注,了解蜱虫的行为对于限制人类和其他动物接触蜱虫至关重要。在这里,我们想了解美洲钝蝽和斑纹钝蝽探索和挖掘的驱动因素。我们采用因子设计来评估基质(沙子、土壤和岩石)、温度(16°C和22°C)、蜱类(斑点蜱和美洲蜱)和竞争(场内蜱的同质或异质混合)对实验室场所蜱行为的影响。不同种类的蜱虫的寻访行为差异显著,61%的美洲蜱虫会寻访,而35%的斑点蜱虫会寻访。基质同样影响着蜱虫的探索,大多数蜱虫在有沙子的场所(83%)进行探索,而在有岩石(35%)或土壤(25%)的场所进行探索。挖洞行为也受基质的影响;岩石区(100%)的蜱虫和土壤区(98%)的蜱虫都有挖洞行为,而沙土区只有10%的蜱虫有挖洞行为。美洲胡蜂比斑胡蜂(23±2.8 cm vs 9.7±2.3 cm)的迁徙距离长。沙子和岩石/土壤基质在实验室行为上的差异可能需要在实地环境中进一步考虑,因为了解抑制蜱虫寻找宿主行为的因素可以为公共空间的管理提供信息,并可能有助于减少蜱虫暴露。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vector Ecology is an international journal published by the Society for Vector Ecology. It is concerned with all aspects of the biology, ecology, and control of arthropod and vertebrate vectors and the interrelationships between the vectors and the agents of disease that they transmit. The journal publishes original research articles and scientific notes, as well as comprehensive reviews of vector biology based on presentations at Society meetings. All papers are reviewed by at least two qualified scientists who recommend their suitability for publication. Acceptance of manuscripts is based on their scientific merit and is the final decision of the editor, but these decisions may be appealed to the editorial board. The journal began publishing in 1974 and now publishes on-line only.