Single-modality endocrine therapy versus radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in women aged 70 years and older with luminal A-like early breast cancer (EUROPA): a preplanned interim analysis of a phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised trial

Icro Meattini, Maria Carmen De Santis, Luca Visani, Marta Scorsetti, Alessandra Fozza, Bruno Meduri, Fiorenza De Rose, Elisabetta Bonzano, Agnese Prisco, Valeria Masiello, Eliana La Rocca, Ruggero Spoto, Carlotta Becherini, Gladys Blandino, Luca Moscetti, Riccardo Ray Colciago, Riccardo A Audisio, Etienne Brain, Saverio Caini, Marije Hamaker, Jure Verbancic
{"title":"Single-modality endocrine therapy versus radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in women aged 70 years and older with luminal A-like early breast cancer (EUROPA): a preplanned interim analysis of a phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised trial","authors":"Icro Meattini, Maria Carmen De Santis, Luca Visani, Marta Scorsetti, Alessandra Fozza, Bruno Meduri, Fiorenza De Rose, Elisabetta Bonzano, Agnese Prisco, Valeria Masiello, Eliana La Rocca, Ruggero Spoto, Carlotta Becherini, Gladys Blandino, Luca Moscetti, Riccardo Ray Colciago, Riccardo A Audisio, Etienne Brain, Saverio Caini, Marije Hamaker, Jure Verbancic","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00661-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Optimal therapy following breast-conserving surgery in older adults with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer remains uncertain. The EUROPA trial aims to compare the effects of radiotherapy and endocrine therapy as single-modality treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) outcomes in this population.<h3>Methods</h3>This non-inferiority, phase 3, randomised study was conducted at 18 academic hospitals across Italy (17 centres) and Slovenia (one centre). Eligible patients were women aged 70 years or older with histologically confirmed, stage I, luminal A-like breast cancer, who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive single-modality endocrine therapy or radiotherapy. Endocrine therapy consisted of daily oral aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen, for a total planned duration of 5–10 years as per clinical discretion, while radiotherapy was administered as either whole breast or partial breast irradiation, delivered in 5–15 fractions. Randomisation was stratified by health status according to the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool and by age, with allocation concealed and no blinding. The co-primary endpoints were the change in HRQOL, assessed by the global health status (GHS) scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module at 24 months, and 5-year IBTR rates (not reported here). This preplanned interim analysis was performed once at least 152 patients completed the 24-month GHS HRQOL assessment. The safety population comprised patients who received the study intervention at least once after randomisation. The study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT04134598</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is ongoing and actively recruiting.<h3>Findings</h3>Between March 4, 2021, and June 14, 2024, 731 women were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy (n=365) or endocrine therapy (n=366). This analysis included 104 patients in the radiotherapy group and 103 in the endocrine therapy group, with a median follow-up of 23·9 months (IQR 22·9–24·2). Patients were predominantly White (204 [99%] of 207) and the median age was 75·0 years (IQR 73·0–80·0) in the radiotherapy group and 74·0 years (72·0–80·0) in the endocrine therapy group. 86 patients in the radiotherapy group and 75 in the endocrine therapy group completed the 24-month HRQOL assessment. The mean baseline GHS score was 71·9 (SD 19·1) in the radiotherapy group and 75·5 (19·3) in the endocrine therapy group. At 24 months, the age-adjusted, G8 score-adjusted mean change from baseline in GHS was –3·40 (95% CI –7·82 to 1·03; p=0·13) in the radiotherapy group and –9·79 (–14·45 to –5·13; p&lt;0·0001) in the endocrine therapy group, with an adjusted mean difference of 6·39 (0·14 to 12·65; p=0·045) favouring radiotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the radiotherapy group (65 [67%] of 97 patients) compared with the endocrine therapy group (76 [85%] of 89). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were arthralgia (six [7%] of 89 in the endocrine therapy group <em>vs</em> 0 of 97 in the radiotherapy group), pelvic organ prolapse (three [3%] <em>vs</em> 0), fatigue, hot flashes, myalgia, bone pain, and fractures (two [2%] <em>vs</em> 0 for each). Serious adverse events were reported in 15 (15%) patients in the radiotherapy group and 13 (15%) in the endocrine therapy group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Endocrine therapy was associated with a greater reduction in HRQOL, as measured by GHS, compared with radiotherapy at 24 months. While these interim results suggest radiotherapy might better preserve HRQOL in older women with low-risk early breast cancer, further data on disease control outcomes and final patient accrual are needed to draw definitive conclusions.<h3>Funding</h3>Fondazione Radioterapia Oncologica.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00661-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Optimal therapy following breast-conserving surgery in older adults with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer remains uncertain. The EUROPA trial aims to compare the effects of radiotherapy and endocrine therapy as single-modality treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) outcomes in this population.

Methods

This non-inferiority, phase 3, randomised study was conducted at 18 academic hospitals across Italy (17 centres) and Slovenia (one centre). Eligible patients were women aged 70 years or older with histologically confirmed, stage I, luminal A-like breast cancer, who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive single-modality endocrine therapy or radiotherapy. Endocrine therapy consisted of daily oral aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen, for a total planned duration of 5–10 years as per clinical discretion, while radiotherapy was administered as either whole breast or partial breast irradiation, delivered in 5–15 fractions. Randomisation was stratified by health status according to the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool and by age, with allocation concealed and no blinding. The co-primary endpoints were the change in HRQOL, assessed by the global health status (GHS) scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module at 24 months, and 5-year IBTR rates (not reported here). This preplanned interim analysis was performed once at least 152 patients completed the 24-month GHS HRQOL assessment. The safety population comprised patients who received the study intervention at least once after randomisation. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04134598, and is ongoing and actively recruiting.

Findings

Between March 4, 2021, and June 14, 2024, 731 women were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy (n=365) or endocrine therapy (n=366). This analysis included 104 patients in the radiotherapy group and 103 in the endocrine therapy group, with a median follow-up of 23·9 months (IQR 22·9–24·2). Patients were predominantly White (204 [99%] of 207) and the median age was 75·0 years (IQR 73·0–80·0) in the radiotherapy group and 74·0 years (72·0–80·0) in the endocrine therapy group. 86 patients in the radiotherapy group and 75 in the endocrine therapy group completed the 24-month HRQOL assessment. The mean baseline GHS score was 71·9 (SD 19·1) in the radiotherapy group and 75·5 (19·3) in the endocrine therapy group. At 24 months, the age-adjusted, G8 score-adjusted mean change from baseline in GHS was –3·40 (95% CI –7·82 to 1·03; p=0·13) in the radiotherapy group and –9·79 (–14·45 to –5·13; p<0·0001) in the endocrine therapy group, with an adjusted mean difference of 6·39 (0·14 to 12·65; p=0·045) favouring radiotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the radiotherapy group (65 [67%] of 97 patients) compared with the endocrine therapy group (76 [85%] of 89). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were arthralgia (six [7%] of 89 in the endocrine therapy group vs 0 of 97 in the radiotherapy group), pelvic organ prolapse (three [3%] vs 0), fatigue, hot flashes, myalgia, bone pain, and fractures (two [2%] vs 0 for each). Serious adverse events were reported in 15 (15%) patients in the radiotherapy group and 13 (15%) in the endocrine therapy group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group.

Interpretation

Endocrine therapy was associated with a greater reduction in HRQOL, as measured by GHS, compared with radiotherapy at 24 months. While these interim results suggest radiotherapy might better preserve HRQOL in older women with low-risk early breast cancer, further data on disease control outcomes and final patient accrual are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Funding

Fondazione Radioterapia Oncologica.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
70岁及以上女性a腔样早期乳腺癌(EUROPA)保乳手术后单模态内分泌治疗与放疗:一项预先计划的3期非效性随机试验中期分析
背景:低风险早期乳腺癌老年人保乳手术后的最佳治疗方案仍不确定。EUROPA试验旨在比较放疗和内分泌治疗作为单模式治疗对该人群健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和同侧乳腺肿瘤复发(IBTR)结局的影响。方法这项非劣效性的3期随机研究在意大利(17个中心)和斯洛文尼亚(1个中心)的18所学术医院进行。符合条件的患者为年龄在70岁及以上,经组织学证实为I期腔a样乳腺癌,行保乳手术,东部肿瘤合作组评分为0或1分的女性。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受单模态内分泌治疗或放疗。内分泌治疗包括每日口服芳香酶抑制剂或他莫昔芬,根据临床判断,总计划持续时间为5-10年,而放疗以全乳房或部分乳房照射进行,分5-15次递送。根据Geriatric 8 (G8)筛查工具和年龄按健康状况进行随机分层,分配隐蔽,无盲法。共同主要终点是HRQOL的变化,通过欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷30项核心模块的全球健康状况(GHS)量表评估24个月和5年IBTR率(此处未报告)。一旦至少152名患者完成了24个月的GHS HRQOL评估,就进行了这项预先计划的中期分析。安全人群包括在随机化后至少接受过一次研究干预的患者。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT04134598,目前正在积极招募中。在2021年3月4日至2024年6月14日期间,731名女性被随机分配接受放疗(n=365)或内分泌治疗(n=366)。放疗组104例,内分泌治疗组103例,中位随访23.9个月(IQR 22.9 ~ 24.2)。患者以白人为主(204例[99%]/ 207例),放疗组中位年龄为70.5岁(IQR 70.3 ~ 800.0),内分泌治疗组中位年龄为70.4岁(72.0 ~ 800.0)。放疗组86例,内分泌治疗组75例完成24个月HRQOL评估。放疗组基线GHS评分均值为71.9 (SD 19.1),内分泌治疗组基线GHS评分均值为75.5 (SD 19.3)。在24个月时,GHS中年龄调整后的G8评分与基线的平均变化为- 3.40 (95% CI - 7.82 ~ 1.03;放疗组P = 0.13),放疗组P = - 9.79 (- 14.45 ~ - 5.13;P< 0.0001),调整后的平均差异为6.39 (0.14 ~ 12.65;P =0·045)倾向于放疗。放疗组(97例患者中65例[67%])与内分泌治疗组(89例患者中76例[85%])相比,治疗相关不良事件发生率较低。最常见的3-4级不良事件是关节痛(内分泌治疗组89例中有6例[7%],放疗组97例中有0例)、盆腔器官脱垂(3例[3%],分别为0例)、疲劳、潮热、肌痛、骨痛和骨折(2例[2%],分别为0例)。放疗组严重不良事件15例(15%),内分泌治疗组13例(15%)。两组均无治疗相关死亡。解释:根据GHS测量,与放疗相比,内分泌治疗与24个月时HRQOL的更大降低相关。虽然这些中期结果表明放疗可能更好地保持低风险早期乳腺癌老年妇女的HRQOL,但需要进一步的疾病控制结果和最终患者累积数据来得出明确的结论。资助肿瘤放射治疗基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Texan judge blocks US FDA changes on cigarette packaging India is boosting vaccination efforts to eradicate cervical cancer Tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (MORPHEUS-Liver): a randomised, open-label, phase 1b–2, study Insights into the future of first-line advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatment Thermal ablation versus surgical resection of small-size colorectal liver metastases (COLLISION): an international, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1