What research evidence is required on violence against women to inform future pandemic preparedness? A scoping review of the research evidence and gaps.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015877
Aoibheann Brennan-Wilson, Qurat Ul Ain, Canan Ozkaya, Avni Amin, Claudia García-Moreno, Allen Thurston, Alison Mackenzie, Susan Lagdon, Patrick Stark, Maria Lohan
{"title":"What research evidence is required on violence against women to inform future pandemic preparedness? A scoping review of the research evidence and gaps.","authors":"Aoibheann Brennan-Wilson, Qurat Ul Ain, Canan Ozkaya, Avni Amin, Claudia García-Moreno, Allen Thurston, Alison Mackenzie, Susan Lagdon, Patrick Stark, Maria Lohan","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Violence against women (VAW) during the COVID-19 pandemic was described as the 'shadow pandemic' with an increase in reports of VAW. As countries now focus on becoming more resilient to future pandemics, it is critical to understand what we learnt about evidence on VAW burden, prevention, and response during the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO commissioned this scoping review to gain an understanding of the research evidence on VAW during COVID-19 and to inform future pandemic preparedness efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Terms relating to VAW and COVID-19 were used to search six databases between 1 January 2020 and 11 February 2023, inclusive of all study designs. Data on thematic focus (ie, burden of violence and/or interventions/services), types of violence, study design, study setting and participant characteristics were synthesised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 25 080 identified records, 694 publications were reviewed in full text and 419 publications were included. The majority (>95%) of the published research was devoted to documenting the burden of VAW, while only 6.2% studied solutions (interventions/services), with even less emphasis on identifying how to prevent VAW in a pandemic context (1%). Gaps in research on VAW that existed prior to the pandemic on women who face multiple intersecting forms of disadvantage endured. Outstanding also was the gap in research on digital-mediated violence (<5%), even as reports of online facilitated violence soared. Additionally, gaps in evidence on specific types of violence such as femicide, forced marriage and acid attacks persisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>That VAW will be a critical concern, and its impacts worsened during pandemics in the future is certain. The research community does not need to spend more on understanding the burden of forms of VAW but pivot to research to adapt and innovate how to deliver prevention and support services, especially to populations who are disproportionately impacted. In addition to addressing this broader gap in prevention and response during pandemics, further evidence is required on the specific area of technology-mediated violence, femicide, forced marriage and acid attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015877","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Violence against women (VAW) during the COVID-19 pandemic was described as the 'shadow pandemic' with an increase in reports of VAW. As countries now focus on becoming more resilient to future pandemics, it is critical to understand what we learnt about evidence on VAW burden, prevention, and response during the COVID-19 pandemic. The WHO commissioned this scoping review to gain an understanding of the research evidence on VAW during COVID-19 and to inform future pandemic preparedness efforts.

Methods: Terms relating to VAW and COVID-19 were used to search six databases between 1 January 2020 and 11 February 2023, inclusive of all study designs. Data on thematic focus (ie, burden of violence and/or interventions/services), types of violence, study design, study setting and participant characteristics were synthesised.

Results: Of 25 080 identified records, 694 publications were reviewed in full text and 419 publications were included. The majority (>95%) of the published research was devoted to documenting the burden of VAW, while only 6.2% studied solutions (interventions/services), with even less emphasis on identifying how to prevent VAW in a pandemic context (1%). Gaps in research on VAW that existed prior to the pandemic on women who face multiple intersecting forms of disadvantage endured. Outstanding also was the gap in research on digital-mediated violence (<5%), even as reports of online facilitated violence soared. Additionally, gaps in evidence on specific types of violence such as femicide, forced marriage and acid attacks persisted.

Conclusion: That VAW will be a critical concern, and its impacts worsened during pandemics in the future is certain. The research community does not need to spend more on understanding the burden of forms of VAW but pivot to research to adapt and innovate how to deliver prevention and support services, especially to populations who are disproportionately impacted. In addition to addressing this broader gap in prevention and response during pandemics, further evidence is required on the specific area of technology-mediated violence, femicide, forced marriage and acid attacks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要哪些关于暴力侵害妇女行为的研究证据来为今后的大流行病防范工作提供信息?对研究证据和差距的范围审查。
导言:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的暴力侵害妇女行为被称为“影子大流行”,有关暴力侵害妇女行为的报告有所增加。随着各国现在将重点放在增强对未来大流行的抵御能力上,了解我们在COVID-19大流行期间了解到的关于暴力侵害妇女行为负担、预防和应对的证据至关重要。世卫组织委托进行这次范围审查,以了解COVID-19期间对妇女暴力的研究证据,并为未来的大流行防范工作提供信息。方法:使用与VAW和COVID-19相关的术语检索2020年1月1日至2023年2月11日期间的6个数据库,包括所有研究设计。综合了关于专题重点(即暴力负担和/或干预措施/服务)、暴力类型、研究设计、研究环境和参与者特征的数据。结果:25 080篇文献中,694篇文献被全文检索,419篇文献被收录。已发表的研究中,大多数(95%)致力于记录暴力侵害妇女行为的负担,而只有6.2%研究了解决办法(干预措施/服务),更少强调在大流行背景下确定如何预防暴力侵害妇女行为(1%)。在大流行病之前,关于对妇女暴力的研究存在差距,对面临多种交叉不利形式的妇女的研究存在差距。对数字媒介暴力的研究也存在差距(结论:对妇女的暴力行为将是一个严重问题,其影响在未来大流行期间肯定会恶化)。研究界不需要花更多的钱来了解各种形式的暴力侵害行为的负担,而是要把重点放在研究上,以适应和创新如何提供预防和支持服务,特别是向受到不成比例影响的人群提供预防和支持服务。除了解决大流行病期间预防和应对方面的这一更大差距之外,还需要在技术介导的暴力、杀害妇女、强迫婚姻和泼酸袭击等具体领域提供进一步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Age- and sex-specific incidence rates and future projections for hip fractures in Zimbabwe. Strengthening advanced therapy for sickle cell disease in Africa: experience from sickle cell disease centre in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. How climate change is shaping young people's health: a participatory, youth co-led study from Bangladesh, Guatemala and Nigeria. Exploring the burden of cholera in the WHO African region: patterns and trends from 2000 to 2023 cholera outbreak data. Gender equality and quality of life must be central to the design and delivery of sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1