Mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the Swiss dialysis population beyond SARS-CoV-2 infection.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae322
David A Jaques, Linard Hoessly, Rebecca Guidotti, Michael Koller, Belen Ponte, Patrice Ambuehl
{"title":"Mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the Swiss dialysis population beyond SARS-CoV-2 infection.","authors":"David A Jaques, Linard Hoessly, Rebecca Guidotti, Michael Koller, Belen Ponte, Patrice Ambuehl","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While SARS-CoV-2 infection has direct obvious consequences on patients undergoing dialysis, the COVID-19 pandemic also had an indirect impact on health systems. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether the COVID-19 era itself was associated with adverse consequences in the Swiss dialysis population as compared to the pre-COVID-19 era, while accounting for direct impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included all patients recorded in the Swiss dialysis registry from January 2014 to December 2022. The pre-COVID-19 era and the COVID-19 era were defined based on the cut-off date of January 2020. Cox proportional hazard model was used with all-cause mortality as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 7837 patients from 97 dialysis centres. Median age was 68.6 years with 66.1% men. Crude mortality rates were 11.6% (11.0% to 12.2%) and 14.2% (13.4% to 14.9%) person-years for the pre-COVID-19 era and the COVID-19 era, respectively. In multivariable analysis, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 4.26, 95% CI 3.65 to 4.97, <i>P </i>< .001) while the COVID-19 era itself was not (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08, <i>P </i>= .687).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 era was not associated with an excess of mortality in the Swiss dialysis population as compared to the pre-COVID-19 era when accounting for the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This suggests that control measures established during the pandemic did not have a negative impact on dialysis patients at the national level. These results could inform health policy makers in the eventuality of future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"17 12","pages":"sfae322"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While SARS-CoV-2 infection has direct obvious consequences on patients undergoing dialysis, the COVID-19 pandemic also had an indirect impact on health systems. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether the COVID-19 era itself was associated with adverse consequences in the Swiss dialysis population as compared to the pre-COVID-19 era, while accounting for direct impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: We retrospectively included all patients recorded in the Swiss dialysis registry from January 2014 to December 2022. The pre-COVID-19 era and the COVID-19 era were defined based on the cut-off date of January 2020. Cox proportional hazard model was used with all-cause mortality as the primary outcome.

Results: The cohort consisted of 7837 patients from 97 dialysis centres. Median age was 68.6 years with 66.1% men. Crude mortality rates were 11.6% (11.0% to 12.2%) and 14.2% (13.4% to 14.9%) person-years for the pre-COVID-19 era and the COVID-19 era, respectively. In multivariable analysis, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 4.26, 95% CI 3.65 to 4.97, < .001) while the COVID-19 era itself was not (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08, = .687).

Conclusions: The COVID-19 era was not associated with an excess of mortality in the Swiss dialysis population as compared to the pre-COVID-19 era when accounting for the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This suggests that control measures established during the pandemic did not have a negative impact on dialysis patients at the national level. These results could inform health policy makers in the eventuality of future pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除SARS-CoV-2感染外,瑞士透析人群中与COVID-19大流行相关的死亡率
背景:虽然SARS-CoV-2感染对透析患者有直接的明显后果,但COVID-19大流行也对卫生系统产生了间接影响。因此,我们的目的是确定与前COVID-19时代相比,COVID-19时代本身是否与瑞士透析人群的不良后果相关,同时考虑到SARS-CoV-2感染的直接影响。方法:回顾性纳入2014年1月至2022年12月瑞士透析登记处记录的所有患者。新冠疫情前和新冠疫情时期以2020年1月为截止日期。采用Cox比例风险模型,以全因死亡率为主要结局。结果:该队列包括来自97个透析中心的7837名患者。中位年龄为68.6岁,男性占66.1%。新冠肺炎前期和新冠肺炎时期的粗死亡率分别为11.6%(11.0% ~ 12.2%)和14.2%(13.4% ~ 14.9%)人年。在多变量分析中,SARS-CoV-2感染与死亡风险增加相关(HR 4.26, 95% CI 3.65 ~ 4.97, P = 0.687)。结论:考虑到SARS-CoV-2感染的直接影响,与前COVID-19时代相比,COVID-19时代与瑞士透析人群的死亡率增加无关。这表明,在大流行期间制定的控制措施并未对国家一级的透析患者产生负面影响。这些结果可使卫生政策制定者了解未来大流行的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
期刊最新文献
Iron management and exercise training in individuals with chronic kidney disease: lived experiences. Novel NUP160 mutations related to simultaneous congenital nephropathy and ovarian insufficiency. Acute kidney injury as a key predictor of cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients: the CKD-REIN study. Health outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients with cognitive impairment or dementia: a global collaborative analysis. Current practices in prevention, screening, and treatment of diabetes in kidney transplant recipients: European survey highlights from the ERA DESCARTES Working Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1