Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced and Locally Recurrent Colon Cancer.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2024.103692
R A F Agas, M Fahey, R R Gosavi, J C H Kong, J Tan, J Chu, T Leong, S Warrier, A Heriot, S Y Ngan
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced and Locally Recurrent Colon Cancer.","authors":"R A F Agas, M Fahey, R R Gosavi, J C H Kong, J Tan, J Chu, T Leong, S Warrier, A Heriot, S Y Ngan","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.103692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>While systemic management of high risk colon cancer is well addressed, advances in local management remain incremental. This study aims to identify a group of colon cancer patients where local management remains a challenge, and where intensifying local treatment with radiotherapy is potentially beneficial to minimise the risk of an R1 resection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The patients with select cT4 locally advanced primary colon (LAPC) (n = 40) and locally recurrent colon (LRC) (n = 48) adenocarcinomas who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy from 2005 to 2020 were studied. Radiotherapy prescription was 45-50.4 Gy in conventional fractionation. The estimated median follow-up time was 8.1 years and 6.3 years for the LAPC and LRC groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common primary site was the sigmoid colon (n = 61). In the LAPC group, surgery was performed in 90% (n = 36), 81% (n = 29) of which were R0 resections, with pathologic downstaging occurring in 66.7% (n = 24). In the LRC group, surgery was possible in 79.2% (n = 38), 65.8% (n = 25) of which were R0 resections. For the LAPC group, 13% (n = 5) had local failures (hazard rate 3%, 95% CI 1-6%), 38% (n = 14) had any disease progression (hazard rate 9%; 95% CI 5-14), and 55% (n = 22) were alive at the end of the follow-up period (hazard rate 8%; 95% CI 5-13). For the LRC group, 35% (n = 17) had local failures (5-year local failure-free survival: 53%; 95% CI: 37-74), and 61% (n = 30) had any disease progression (5-year progression-free survival: 28%; 95% CI: 17%-48%). Five-year overall survival for the LRC group was 50% (95% CI: 37-68). There was no 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local management of high risk colon cancer remains a challenge. Future studies in neoadjuvant chemoradiation and systemic therapy, and staging methodology in identifying the high risk group are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"37 ","pages":"103692"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2024.103692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: While systemic management of high risk colon cancer is well addressed, advances in local management remain incremental. This study aims to identify a group of colon cancer patients where local management remains a challenge, and where intensifying local treatment with radiotherapy is potentially beneficial to minimise the risk of an R1 resection.

Materials and methods: The patients with select cT4 locally advanced primary colon (LAPC) (n = 40) and locally recurrent colon (LRC) (n = 48) adenocarcinomas who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy from 2005 to 2020 were studied. Radiotherapy prescription was 45-50.4 Gy in conventional fractionation. The estimated median follow-up time was 8.1 years and 6.3 years for the LAPC and LRC groups, respectively.

Results: The most common primary site was the sigmoid colon (n = 61). In the LAPC group, surgery was performed in 90% (n = 36), 81% (n = 29) of which were R0 resections, with pathologic downstaging occurring in 66.7% (n = 24). In the LRC group, surgery was possible in 79.2% (n = 38), 65.8% (n = 25) of which were R0 resections. For the LAPC group, 13% (n = 5) had local failures (hazard rate 3%, 95% CI 1-6%), 38% (n = 14) had any disease progression (hazard rate 9%; 95% CI 5-14), and 55% (n = 22) were alive at the end of the follow-up period (hazard rate 8%; 95% CI 5-13). For the LRC group, 35% (n = 17) had local failures (5-year local failure-free survival: 53%; 95% CI: 37-74), and 61% (n = 30) had any disease progression (5-year progression-free survival: 28%; 95% CI: 17%-48%). Five-year overall survival for the LRC group was 50% (95% CI: 37-68). There was no 30-day mortality.

Conclusion: Local management of high risk colon cancer remains a challenge. Future studies in neoadjuvant chemoradiation and systemic therapy, and staging methodology in identifying the high risk group are urgently needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期和局部复发结肠癌的新辅助放化疗。
目的:虽然高危结肠癌的系统管理得到了很好的解决,但局部管理的进展仍然是渐进的。本研究旨在确定一组局部治疗仍然是一个挑战的结肠癌患者,其中强化局部放疗治疗可能有助于将R1切除术的风险降至最低。材料与方法:选取2005 ~ 2020年接受新辅助放疗的cT4局部晚期原发性结肠(LAPC) (n = 40)和局部复发性结肠(LRC) (n = 48)腺癌患者作为研究对象。常规分路放疗处方为45 ~ 50.4 Gy。LAPC组和LRC组的中位随访时间分别为8.1年和6.3年。结果:最常见的原发部位为乙状结肠(n = 61)。在LAPC组中,90% (n = 36)的患者进行了手术,81% (n = 29)的患者进行了R0切除,66.7% (n = 24)的患者出现了病理性分期下降。在LRC组中,79.2% (n = 38)的患者可以手术,65.8% (n = 25)的患者R0切除。对于LAPC组,13% (n = 5)有局部失败(危险率3%,95% CI 1-6%), 38% (n = 14)有任何疾病进展(危险率9%;95% CI 5-14), 55% (n = 22)在随访结束时存活(危险率8%;95% ci 5-13)。对于LRC组,35% (n = 17)有局部失败(5年局部无失败生存率:53%;95% CI: 37-74), 61% (n = 30)有任何疾病进展(5年无进展生存率:28%;95% ci: 17%-48%)。LRC组的5年总生存率为50% (95% CI: 37-68)。没有30天死亡率。结论:高危结肠癌的局部治疗仍是一个挑战。迫切需要进一步研究新辅助放化疗和全身治疗,以及确定高危人群的分期方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Under-representation for Female Pelvis Cancers in Commercial Auto-segmentation Solutions and Open-source Imaging Datasets. Correspondence to the Editor: Reirradiation in Paediatric Tumors of the Central Nervous System: Outcome and Side Effects After Implementing National Guidelines. Comparing the Robustness of Intensity-modulated Proton Therapy and Proton-arc Therapy Against Interplay Effects of 4D Robust-optimised Plans for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. OncoFlash: Research Updates in a Flash! REMIT: Reirradiation of Diffuse Midline Glioma Patients -A Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Feasibility Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1