{"title":"Strategies for extending the half-life of biotherapeutics: successes and complications.","authors":"Uli Binder, Arne Skerra","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2436094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Engineering of the drug half-life in vivo has become an integral part of modern biopharmaceutical development due to the fact that many proteins/peptides with therapeutic potential are quickly cleared by kidney filtration after injection and, thus, circulate only a few hours in humans (or just minutes in mice).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Looking at the growing list of clinically approved biologics that have been modified for prolonged activity, and also the plethora of such drugs under preclinical and clinical development, it is evident that not one solution fits all needs, owing to the vastly different structural features and functional properties of the pharmacologically active entities. This article provides an overview of established half-life extension strategies, as well as of emerging novel concepts for extending the in vivo stability of biologicals, and their pros and cons.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Beyond the classical and still dominating technologies for improving drug pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, Fc fusion and PEGylation, various innovative approaches that offer advantages in different respects have entered the clinical stage. While the Fc fusion partner may be gradually superseded by engineered albumin-binding domains, chemical PEGylation may be replaced by biodegradable recombinant amino-acid polymers like PASylation, thus also offering a purely biotechnological manufacturing route.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"93-118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2436094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Engineering of the drug half-life in vivo has become an integral part of modern biopharmaceutical development due to the fact that many proteins/peptides with therapeutic potential are quickly cleared by kidney filtration after injection and, thus, circulate only a few hours in humans (or just minutes in mice).
Areas covered: Looking at the growing list of clinically approved biologics that have been modified for prolonged activity, and also the plethora of such drugs under preclinical and clinical development, it is evident that not one solution fits all needs, owing to the vastly different structural features and functional properties of the pharmacologically active entities. This article provides an overview of established half-life extension strategies, as well as of emerging novel concepts for extending the in vivo stability of biologicals, and their pros and cons.
Expert opinion: Beyond the classical and still dominating technologies for improving drug pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, Fc fusion and PEGylation, various innovative approaches that offer advantages in different respects have entered the clinical stage. While the Fc fusion partner may be gradually superseded by engineered albumin-binding domains, chemical PEGylation may be replaced by biodegradable recombinant amino-acid polymers like PASylation, thus also offering a purely biotechnological manufacturing route.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.