The State of STEMI Care Across NSW: A Comparison of Rural, Regional, and Metropolitan Centres.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart, Lung and Circulation Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.016
Ruth Arnold, Georgina M Luscombe, Ryan Gadeley, Sarah Edwards, Estelle Ryan, Steven Faddy, Gabrielle Larnach, Harry Lowe, Andrew Boyle, Catherine Hawke, Alex Elder, Mark Adams, David Amos
{"title":"The State of STEMI Care Across NSW: A Comparison of Rural, Regional, and Metropolitan Centres.","authors":"Ruth Arnold, Georgina M Luscombe, Ryan Gadeley, Sarah Edwards, Estelle Ryan, Steven Faddy, Gabrielle Larnach, Harry Lowe, Andrew Boyle, Catherine Hawke, Alex Elder, Mark Adams, David Amos","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At a global level, regional variation in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is influenced by patient demographics and geography. Rural patients with STEMI are disadvantaged in reaching timely care owing to distance and limited ambulance and healthcare resources. Optimising models of STEMI care is key to overcoming the excess rural vs metropolitan cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this descriptive study, we compare patient characteristics and STEMI management in three Local Health Districts (LHDs) across NSW: a rural LHD (Western NSW [WNSWLHD]), a regional LHD (Hunter New England), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected from file audits conducted from 2019 to 2020 in a rural LHD with a single rural 24/7 cardiac catheter laboratory (WNSWLHD), a regional LHD with a part-time rural cardiac catheter laboratory, and a large regional 24/7 cardiac centre (Hunter New England LHD), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD), with two 24/7 cardiac centres. Patients with STEMI presenting in the three geographic regions were compared on demographics, differences in presentation, time to reperfusion treatment, time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre, distances travelled, proportion of angiograms within 24 hours, and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 2020, there were 675 recorded STEMI across the three regions. The rural site in WNSWLHD had the highest rate of STEMI per capita, with patients more likely to identify as Indigenous, less likely to call an ambulance, and more likely to present to a non-PCI hospital and to receive thrombolysis. Only 14% of these rural patients received primary PCI (PPCI), with patients presenting a median of 153 km from the PCI centre, vs 69% PPCI in the regional and 89% in metropolitan LHD. Thrombolysis was the main reperfusion treatment in WNSWLHD (76%), and the proportion of patients receiving no treatment was the same in all LHDs at 10%. The percentage of patients receiving angiography within 24 hours in the rural site was 84%. There was no substantial difference in in-hospital mortality among the three LHDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We document large differences in the demographic profiles, use of ambulance, and access to PPCI in patients with STEMI across the three NSW centres. Current NSW health and ambulance protocols in a large, sparsely populated rural NSW LHD were able to deliver thrombolysis at the point of contact and facilitate \"hot\" transfer of patients with STEMI to a PCI centre. Long distances and transfer times mean that PPCI is a limited option in rural NSW, with scope for further improvement in models of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At a global level, regional variation in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is influenced by patient demographics and geography. Rural patients with STEMI are disadvantaged in reaching timely care owing to distance and limited ambulance and healthcare resources. Optimising models of STEMI care is key to overcoming the excess rural vs metropolitan cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this descriptive study, we compare patient characteristics and STEMI management in three Local Health Districts (LHDs) across NSW: a rural LHD (Western NSW [WNSWLHD]), a regional LHD (Hunter New England), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD).

Method: Data were collected from file audits conducted from 2019 to 2020 in a rural LHD with a single rural 24/7 cardiac catheter laboratory (WNSWLHD), a regional LHD with a part-time rural cardiac catheter laboratory, and a large regional 24/7 cardiac centre (Hunter New England LHD), and a metropolitan site (Sydney LHD), with two 24/7 cardiac centres. Patients with STEMI presenting in the three geographic regions were compared on demographics, differences in presentation, time to reperfusion treatment, time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centre, distances travelled, proportion of angiograms within 24 hours, and in-hospital mortality.

Results: During 2020, there were 675 recorded STEMI across the three regions. The rural site in WNSWLHD had the highest rate of STEMI per capita, with patients more likely to identify as Indigenous, less likely to call an ambulance, and more likely to present to a non-PCI hospital and to receive thrombolysis. Only 14% of these rural patients received primary PCI (PPCI), with patients presenting a median of 153 km from the PCI centre, vs 69% PPCI in the regional and 89% in metropolitan LHD. Thrombolysis was the main reperfusion treatment in WNSWLHD (76%), and the proportion of patients receiving no treatment was the same in all LHDs at 10%. The percentage of patients receiving angiography within 24 hours in the rural site was 84%. There was no substantial difference in in-hospital mortality among the three LHDs.

Conclusions: We document large differences in the demographic profiles, use of ambulance, and access to PPCI in patients with STEMI across the three NSW centres. Current NSW health and ambulance protocols in a large, sparsely populated rural NSW LHD were able to deliver thrombolysis at the point of contact and facilitate "hot" transfer of patients with STEMI to a PCI centre. Long distances and transfer times mean that PPCI is a limited option in rural NSW, with scope for further improvement in models of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Content Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. Radiofrequency and Cryoablation as Energy Sources in the Cox-Maze Procedure: A Meta-Analysis of Rhythm Outcomes. High-Intensity Interval Training in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. Validation of a Prediction Model From Quantitative Coronary Angiography to Detect Ischaemic Lesions as Evaluated by Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve. The State of STEMI Care Across NSW: A Comparison of Rural, Regional, and Metropolitan Centres.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1