{"title":"Coherence and comprehensibility: Large language models predict lay understanding of health-related content","authors":"Trevor Cohen , Weizhe Xu , Yue Guo , Serguei Pakhomov , Gondy Leroy","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Health literacy is a prerequisite to informed health-related decision making. To facilitate understanding of information, text should be presented at an appropriate reading level for the reader. Cognitive studies suggest that the coherence of a text – the interconnectedness between the ideas it expresses – is especially important for low-knowledge readers, who lack the background knowledge to draw inferences from text that is implicitly connected only. Prior work in cognitive science has yielded automated methods to estimate coherence. These methods estimate the <em>proximity</em> between text representations in a semantic vector space, with the underlying idea that units of text that are poorly connected will be further apart in this space. In addition, recent work with large language models (LLMs) has produced <em>probabilistic</em> methodological analogues that have yet to be evaluated for this purpose. This work concerns the relationship between these automated measures and layperson comprehension of biomedical text. To characterize this relationship, we applied a range of automated measures of text coherence to a set of text snippets, some of which were deliberately modified to improve their accessibility in a series of reading comprehension experiments. Results indicate significant associations between reader comprehension – as estimated using multiple-choice questions – and LLM-derived coherence metrics. Interventions designed to improve the comprehensibility of passages also improved their coherence, as measured with the best-performing LLM-derived models and shown by improved reader understanding of the text. These findings support the utility of LLM-derived measures of text coherence as a means to identify gaps in connectedness that make biomedical text difficult for laypeople to understand, with the potential to inform both manual and automated methods to improve the accessibility of the biomedical literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104758"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204642400176X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Health literacy is a prerequisite to informed health-related decision making. To facilitate understanding of information, text should be presented at an appropriate reading level for the reader. Cognitive studies suggest that the coherence of a text – the interconnectedness between the ideas it expresses – is especially important for low-knowledge readers, who lack the background knowledge to draw inferences from text that is implicitly connected only. Prior work in cognitive science has yielded automated methods to estimate coherence. These methods estimate the proximity between text representations in a semantic vector space, with the underlying idea that units of text that are poorly connected will be further apart in this space. In addition, recent work with large language models (LLMs) has produced probabilistic methodological analogues that have yet to be evaluated for this purpose. This work concerns the relationship between these automated measures and layperson comprehension of biomedical text. To characterize this relationship, we applied a range of automated measures of text coherence to a set of text snippets, some of which were deliberately modified to improve their accessibility in a series of reading comprehension experiments. Results indicate significant associations between reader comprehension – as estimated using multiple-choice questions – and LLM-derived coherence metrics. Interventions designed to improve the comprehensibility of passages also improved their coherence, as measured with the best-performing LLM-derived models and shown by improved reader understanding of the text. These findings support the utility of LLM-derived measures of text coherence as a means to identify gaps in connectedness that make biomedical text difficult for laypeople to understand, with the potential to inform both manual and automated methods to improve the accessibility of the biomedical literature.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.