Frailty in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors and Its Association With Quality of Life and Emotional Health.

IF 14.8 2区医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7066

Valentin H Meissner, Kolja Imhof, Matthias Jahnen, Lukas Lunger, Andreas Dinkel, Stefan Schiele, Donna P Ankerst, Jürgen E Gschwend, Kathleen Herkommer

{"title":"Frailty in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors and Its Association With Quality of Life and Emotional Health.","authors":"Valentin H Meissner, Kolja Imhof, Matthias Jahnen, Lukas Lunger, Andreas Dinkel, Stefan Schiele, Donna P Ankerst, Jürgen E Gschwend, Kathleen Herkommer","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Frailty is emerging as an important determinant for quality of life (QoL) and emotional health in older patients with cancer, and specifically in long-term prostate cancer survivors, but quantitative studies are lacking. The current study assesses the prevalence of frailty and its association with QoL and emotional health in long-term prostate cancer survivors after radical prostatectomy.Patients and methods: A total of 2,979 prostate cancer survivors from the multicenter German Familial Prostate Cancer cohort completed questionnaires on frailty (Groningen Frailty Indicator [GFI]), QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Core 30), and emotional health (anxiety/depression symptoms via the Patient Health Questionnaire-4). Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with frailty.Results: Average patient age was 79.4 years [SD, 6.4 years] and average time since radical prostatectomy was 17.4 years [SD, 3.8 years]. Among the cohort, 33.1% (n=985) of patients were classified as frail (GFI ≥4). Frail patients reported worse emotional health than nonfrail patients (depression symptoms: 24.0% vs 4.0%; anxiety symptoms: 20.6% vs 2.0%; both P<.001) and lower QoL (mean [SD], 53.4 [19.2] vs 72.7 [16.0]); P<.001). Higher age (relative risk [RR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) and worse depressive (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24) and anxiety symptoms (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.23) were associated with frailty. Living in a partnership (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86) and a higher QoL (RR, 0.86 for a 10-point increase; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89) were associated with nonfrailty.Conclusions: In a large German cohort, every third long-term prostate cancer survivor after radical prostatectomy was frail. The association of frailty with lower QoL and poorer mental health indicates the need for an integrated care approach including further geriatric assessment and possible interventions to improve health outcomes targeted to frail patients.","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty is emerging as an important determinant for quality of life (QoL) and emotional health in older patients with cancer, and specifically in long-term prostate cancer survivors, but quantitative studies are lacking. The current study assesses the prevalence of frailty and its association with QoL and emotional health in long-term prostate cancer survivors after radical prostatectomy.

Patients and methods: A total of 2,979 prostate cancer survivors from the multicenter German Familial Prostate Cancer cohort completed questionnaires on frailty (Groningen Frailty Indicator [GFI]), QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Core 30), and emotional health (anxiety/depression symptoms via the Patient Health Questionnaire-4). Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with frailty.

Results: Average patient age was 79.4 years [SD, 6.4 years] and average time since radical prostatectomy was 17.4 years [SD, 3.8 years]. Among the cohort, 33.1% (n=985) of patients were classified as frail (GFI ≥4). Frail patients reported worse emotional health than nonfrail patients (depression symptoms: 24.0% vs 4.0%; anxiety symptoms: 20.6% vs 2.0%; both P<.001) and lower QoL (mean [SD], 53.4 [19.2] vs 72.7 [16.0]); P<.001). Higher age (relative risk [RR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) and worse depressive (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24) and anxiety symptoms (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.23) were associated with frailty. Living in a partnership (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86) and a higher QoL (RR, 0.86 for a 10-point increase; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89) were associated with nonfrailty.

Conclusions: In a large German cohort, every third long-term prostate cancer survivor after radical prostatectomy was frail. The association of frailty with lower QoL and poorer mental health indicates the need for an integrated care approach including further geriatric assessment and possible interventions to improve health outcomes targeted to frail patients.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ONCOLOGY-

CiteScore

20.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

388

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.