Evaluating the Necessity of Ear Packing After Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399
Alper Tabaru, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Sahin Ogreden, Salih Akyel, Iskender Bayram
{"title":"Evaluating the Necessity of Ear Packing After Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Alper Tabaru, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Sahin Ogreden, Salih Akyel, Iskender Bayram","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the necessity of ear packing in otological operations where the annulus fibrosus is not elevated, focusing on graft success rates and postoperative hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital involving 200 patients aged 18 years and above undergoing myringoplasty for inactive chronic suppurative otitis media. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ear packing with absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam®) or no packing. The primary outcome is graft success assessed via microscopic examination at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include hearing gains measured by pure-tone audiometry at 500-, 1000-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months, the graft take rate was 92% in the ear packing group and 90% in the no packing group, with no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.63). At 6 months, the graft take rate was 90% in the packing group and 88% in the no packing group ( p = 0.67). Hearing improvements, as measured by air conduction thresholds, were also similar between the two groups ( p = 0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that myringoplasty without ear packing yields comparable graft take rates and hearing improvements to traditional myringoplasty with ear packing. These findings suggest that omitting ear packing in appropriate cases may simplify the procedure without compromising patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"156-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the necessity of ear packing in otological operations where the annulus fibrosus is not elevated, focusing on graft success rates and postoperative hearing outcomes.

Methods: A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital involving 200 patients aged 18 years and above undergoing myringoplasty for inactive chronic suppurative otitis media. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ear packing with absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam®) or no packing. The primary outcome is graft success assessed via microscopic examination at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include hearing gains measured by pure-tone audiometry at 500-, 1000-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz frequencies.

Results: At 3 months, the graft take rate was 92% in the ear packing group and 90% in the no packing group, with no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.63). At 6 months, the graft take rate was 90% in the packing group and 88% in the no packing group ( p = 0.67). Hearing improvements, as measured by air conduction thresholds, were also similar between the two groups ( p = 0.73).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that myringoplasty without ear packing yields comparable graft take rates and hearing improvements to traditional myringoplasty with ear packing. These findings suggest that omitting ear packing in appropriate cases may simplify the procedure without compromising patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估耳科手术后耳填塞的必要性:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评估在纤维环未升高的耳科手术中耳填塞的必要性,重点关注移植物的成功率和术后听力结果。方法:在某三级医院进行随机对照前瞻性临床试验,纳入200例18岁及以上的非活动性慢性化脓性中耳炎患者行鼓膜成形术。患者被随机分配接受可吸收明胶海绵(Gelfoam®)耳填充物或不填充物。术后3个月和6个月通过显微镜检查评估移植物成功与否。次要结果包括在500、1000、2000和4000赫兹频率下纯音测听测量的听力增益。结果:3个月时,耳填塞组植皮率为92%,无填塞组为90%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.63)。6个月时,填充物组接骨率为90%,未填充物组接骨率为88% (p = 0.67)。通过空气传导阈值测量的听力改善在两组之间也相似(p = 0.73)。结论:本研究表明,无耳填塞的鼓膜成形术与传统的有耳填塞的鼓膜成形术具有相当的移植率和听力改善。这些发现表明,在适当的情况下,省略耳垫可以简化手术过程,而不会影响患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Perioperative Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Hearing Preservation Outcomes. Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma-Associated Hearing Loss. Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes Using Electrical Field Imaging (EFI). Preclinical Study of a Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Device Based on 3D Printing of a Custom Guide. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: 3-Year Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1