Prediction of Seizure Outcome Using Combinations of Four Noninvasive Presurgical Modalities in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-negative Focal Intractable Epilepsy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0194
Rofat Askoro, Kota Kagawa, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Akira Hashizume, Tae Onari, Yutaka Hirokawa, Koji Iida, Nobutaka Horie
{"title":"Prediction of Seizure Outcome Using Combinations of Four Noninvasive Presurgical Modalities in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-negative Focal Intractable Epilepsy.","authors":"Rofat Askoro, Kota Kagawa, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Akira Hashizume, Tae Onari, Yutaka Hirokawa, Koji Iida, Nobutaka Horie","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In focal epilepsy cases, precise identification and resection of the epileptogenic zone increase the likelihood of achieving a seizure-free outcome. Nevertheless, localizing the source of epilepsy in magnetic resonance imaging-negative epilepsy cases presents significant challenges for clinicians. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic efficacy and impact on the seizure outcome by using 4 noninvasive modalities, including scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and iomazenil single-photon emission computed tomography, in a cohort of patients with magnetic resonance imaging-negative focal epilepsy who underwent resective surgery. The concordance status of each modality was assessed relative to the lobar resection area, and surgical outcome was assessed by Engel Classification at least 1 year after surgery. Comparison and diagnostic analyses were calculated for each individual and all possible combinations of scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and single-photon emission computed tomography with respect to Engel class I outcome. Eighteen patients (66.6%, 18/27) had Engel class I outcomes. Patients with at least 2 concordant modalities were associated with Engel class I outcome (p = 0.0262). For individual modality, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography achieved the highest yield of sensitivity (72.2%) compared to scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and single-photon emission computed tomography (50.0%, 61.1%, and 61.6%, respectively). Scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and single-photon emission computed tomography showed similar specificities of 77.7%, while fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography showed a specificity of 55.5%. Combined modalities were able to achieve the highest sensitivity of 83.3% when there were at least 2 concordant modalities and a specificity of 100% with various multiple combinations. Our study showed that lobar concordance from multiple modalities increases the sensitivity and specificity for a seizure-free outcome in magnetic resonance imaging-negative focal epilepsy patients who underwent resective surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In focal epilepsy cases, precise identification and resection of the epileptogenic zone increase the likelihood of achieving a seizure-free outcome. Nevertheless, localizing the source of epilepsy in magnetic resonance imaging-negative epilepsy cases presents significant challenges for clinicians. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic efficacy and impact on the seizure outcome by using 4 noninvasive modalities, including scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and iomazenil single-photon emission computed tomography, in a cohort of patients with magnetic resonance imaging-negative focal epilepsy who underwent resective surgery. The concordance status of each modality was assessed relative to the lobar resection area, and surgical outcome was assessed by Engel Classification at least 1 year after surgery. Comparison and diagnostic analyses were calculated for each individual and all possible combinations of scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and single-photon emission computed tomography with respect to Engel class I outcome. Eighteen patients (66.6%, 18/27) had Engel class I outcomes. Patients with at least 2 concordant modalities were associated with Engel class I outcome (p = 0.0262). For individual modality, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography achieved the highest yield of sensitivity (72.2%) compared to scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and single-photon emission computed tomography (50.0%, 61.1%, and 61.6%, respectively). Scalp video electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and single-photon emission computed tomography showed similar specificities of 77.7%, while fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography showed a specificity of 55.5%. Combined modalities were able to achieve the highest sensitivity of 83.3% when there were at least 2 concordant modalities and a specificity of 100% with various multiple combinations. Our study showed that lobar concordance from multiple modalities increases the sensitivity and specificity for a seizure-free outcome in magnetic resonance imaging-negative focal epilepsy patients who underwent resective surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振成像阴性局灶性难治性癫痫的四种无创术前方式联合预测癫痫发作结局。
在局灶性癫痫病例中,精确识别和切除致痫区可增加获得无癫痫发作结果的可能性。然而,在磁共振成像阴性癫痫病例中定位癫痫的来源对临床医生来说是一个重大挑战。在这项研究中,我们对一组接受切除手术的磁共振成像阴性局灶性癫痫患者进行了4种非侵入性影像学检查,包括头皮视频脑电图、脑磁图、氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描和iomazenil单光子发射计算机断层扫描,以评估其诊断效果和对癫痫发作结果的影响。相对于大叶切除面积评估每种模式的一致性状态,并在术后至少1年通过Engel分级评估手术结果。对每个个体以及头皮视频脑电图、脑磁图、氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描和单光子发射计算机断层扫描的所有可能组合进行Engel I级结果的比较和诊断分析。18例患者(66.6%,18/27)达到Engel I级结局。至少有2种一致性模式的患者与Engel I级结局相关(p = 0.0262)。对于个体模式,与头皮视频脑电图、脑磁图和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(分别为50.0%、61.1%和61.6%)相比,氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描的灵敏度最高(72.2%)。头皮视频脑电图、脑磁图和单光子发射计算机断层扫描显示相似的特异性为77.7%,而氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描显示特异性为55.5%。当至少有2种一致的方式时,联合方式能够达到最高的83.3%的灵敏度,并且多种多种联合方式的特异性为100%。我们的研究表明,在接受切除手术的磁共振成像阴性局灶性癫痫患者中,多种方式的脑叶一致性增加了无癫痫发作结果的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Advanced Age and Hypoalbuminemia as Complication-related Mortality after 30 Days in Older Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Fluid Dynamics Simulation Analysis for Identifying Optimal Anastomosis Sites in Superficial Temporal Artery to Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass Surgery in Cerebrovascular Occlusive Disease. Clazosentan Affects Temporal Profile of Endothelin-A Expression in Macro- and Microcirculation after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Impact of Middle Cerebral Artery Branching Patterns on Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes for M1 Occlusion. Early Experiences with Robotic-assisted Implantation of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes in Awake or Asleep Patients in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1