MRgRT real-time target localization using foundation models for contour point tracking and promptable mask refinement.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physics in medicine and biology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ad9dad
Tom Blöcker, Elia Lombardo, Sebastian N Marschner, Claus Belka, Stefanie Corradini, Miguel A Palacios, Marco Riboldi, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry
{"title":"MRgRT real-time target localization using foundation models for contour point tracking and promptable mask refinement.","authors":"Tom Blöcker, Elia Lombardo, Sebastian N Marschner, Claus Belka, Stefanie Corradini, Miguel A Palacios, Marco Riboldi, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad9dad","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. This study aimed to evaluate two real-time target tracking approaches for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) based on foundation artificial intelligence models.<i>Approach</i>. The first approach used a point-tracking model that propagates points from a reference contour. The second approach used a video-object-segmentation model, based on segment anything model 2 (SAM2). Both approaches were evaluated and compared against each other, inter-observer variability, and a transformer-based image registration model, TransMorph, with and without patient-specific (PS) fine-tuning. The evaluation was carried out on 2D cine MRI datasets from two institutions, containing scans from 33 patients with 8060 labeled frames, with annotations from 2 to 5 observers per frame, totaling 29179 ground truth segmentations. The segmentations produced were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 50% and 95% Hausdorff distances (HD50 / HD95), and the Euclidean center distance (ECD).<i>Main results</i>. The results showed that the contour tracking (median DSC0.92±0.04and ECD1.9±1.0 mm) and SAM2-based (median DSC0.93±0.03and ECD1.6±1.1 mm) approaches produced target segmentations comparable or superior to TransMorph w/o PS fine-tuning (median DSC0.91±0.07and ECD2.6±1.4 mm) and slightly inferior to TransMorph w/ PS fine-tuning (median DSC0.94±0.03and ECD1.4±0.8 mm). Between the two novel approaches, the one based on SAM2 performed marginally better at a higher computational cost (inference times 92 ms for contour tracking and 109 ms for SAM2). Both approaches and TransMorph w/ PS fine-tuning exceeded inter-observer variability (median DSC0.90±0.06and ECD1.7±0.7 mm).<i>Significance</i>. This study demonstrates the potential of foundation models to achieve high-quality real-time target tracking in MRgRT, offering performance that matches state-of-the-art methods without requiring PS fine-tuning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad9dad","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. This study aimed to evaluate two real-time target tracking approaches for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) based on foundation artificial intelligence models.Approach. The first approach used a point-tracking model that propagates points from a reference contour. The second approach used a video-object-segmentation model, based on segment anything model 2 (SAM2). Both approaches were evaluated and compared against each other, inter-observer variability, and a transformer-based image registration model, TransMorph, with and without patient-specific (PS) fine-tuning. The evaluation was carried out on 2D cine MRI datasets from two institutions, containing scans from 33 patients with 8060 labeled frames, with annotations from 2 to 5 observers per frame, totaling 29179 ground truth segmentations. The segmentations produced were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 50% and 95% Hausdorff distances (HD50 / HD95), and the Euclidean center distance (ECD).Main results. The results showed that the contour tracking (median DSC0.92±0.04and ECD1.9±1.0 mm) and SAM2-based (median DSC0.93±0.03and ECD1.6±1.1 mm) approaches produced target segmentations comparable or superior to TransMorph w/o PS fine-tuning (median DSC0.91±0.07and ECD2.6±1.4 mm) and slightly inferior to TransMorph w/ PS fine-tuning (median DSC0.94±0.03and ECD1.4±0.8 mm). Between the two novel approaches, the one based on SAM2 performed marginally better at a higher computational cost (inference times 92 ms for contour tracking and 109 ms for SAM2). Both approaches and TransMorph w/ PS fine-tuning exceeded inter-observer variability (median DSC0.90±0.06and ECD1.7±0.7 mm).Significance. This study demonstrates the potential of foundation models to achieve high-quality real-time target tracking in MRgRT, offering performance that matches state-of-the-art methods without requiring PS fine-tuning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于基础模型的MRgRT实时目标定位,轮廓点跟踪和快速掩模细化。
目的:本研究旨在评估两种基于基础人工智能(AI)模型的磁共振成像(MRI)引导放疗(MRgRT)实时目标跟踪方法。方法:第一种方法使用从参考轮廓传播点的点跟踪模型。第二种方法使用基于分段任意模型2 (SAM2)的视频对象分割模型。对这两种方法进行了评估和比较,并对观察者之间的可变性和基于变压器的图像配准模型TransMorph进行了评估和比较,并进行了患者特异性(PS)微调。对来自两家机构的2D电影MRI数据集进行评估,包含来自33名患者的扫描,有8060个标记帧,每帧有2到5个观察者的注释,总计29179个地面真值分割。使用Dice相似系数(DSC), 50%和95% Hausdorff距离(HD50 / HD95)以及欧几里得中心距离(ECD)对所产生的分割进行评估。结果表明,轮廓跟踪(DSC中位数为0.92±0.04,ECD为1.9±1.0 mm)和基于sam2的方法(DSC中位数为0.93±0.03,ECD为1.6±1.1 mm)的目标分割效果与未进行PS微调的TransMorph方法(DSC中位数为0.91±0.07,ECD为2.6±1.4 mm)相当或优于无PS微调的TransMorph方法(DSC中位数为0.94±0.03,ECD为1.4±0.8 mm),略低于有PS微调的TransMorph方法(DSC中位数为0.94±0.03,ECD为1.4±0.8 mm)。在这两种新方法之间,基于SAM2的方法表现略好,但计算成本更高(轮廓跟踪推理时间为92 ms, SAM2推理时间为109 ms)。两种方法和带有PS微调的TransMorph都超过了观察者间的可变性(DSC中值0.90±0.06和ECD中值1.7±0.7 mm)。意义:本研究证明了基础模型在MRgRT中实现高质量实时目标跟踪的潜力,在不需要PS微调的情况下提供与最先进方法相匹配的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
期刊最新文献
Impact of daily volumetric imaging on target tracking without fiducial markers during robotic treatment of pancreas. Free Flight Angular Acceptance (FFAA) variance reduction technique for SPECT Monte Carlo simulations. Feasibility of proton ultra-high-dose-rate spatially fractionated radiotherapy system for preclinical experiments on a compact proton synchrocyclotron. Sparse probabilistic evaluation for treatment planning: a feasibility study in IMPT head and neck patients. Optimizing harmonic shear wave elastography over three distinct frequency regimes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1