A Clinical Prediction Model For Short-Term Prognosis In Patients With Non Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002535
Xiaoke Wang, Xiaojuan Fan, Taibo Wu, Shaopeng Che, Xue Shi, Peining Liu, Junhui Liu, Yongbai Luo, Yue Wu, Beidi Lan
{"title":"A Clinical Prediction Model For Short-Term Prognosis In Patients With Non Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock.","authors":"Xiaoke Wang, Xiaojuan Fan, Taibo Wu, Shaopeng Che, Xue Shi, Peining Liu, Junhui Liu, Yongbai Luo, Yue Wu, Beidi Lan","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely recognized as the primary cause of Cardiogenic Shock (CS), Non-AMI related CS has been excluded from the majority of CS studies. Information on its prognostic factors remains largely understudied, and it is necessary to focus on these patients to identify the specific risk factors. In this study, we aimed to build and validate a predictive nomogram and risk classification system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1298 patients and 548 patients with CS from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) and MIMIC-III databases were included in the study after excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lasson and logistic regression analysis were used to identify statistically significant predictors which were finally involved in the nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram was validated by calibration plots and was compared with other scoring systems by AUC and DCA curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, heart rate, WBC count, albumin level, lactic acid level, GCS Score, 24 h urine output, and vasopressor use were identified as the most critical factors for in-hospital death. Based on these results, a nomogram was established for predicting in-hospital mortality. The AUC value of the nomogram was 0.806 in the training group and 0.814 and 0.730 in the internal and external validation sets, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of other commonly used Intensive Care Unit scoring systems (SAPSII, APSIII, and SOFA).In addition, the survival curve showed significant differences in the 30-day survival of the three risk subgroups divided by the nomogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For non-AMI associated CS, a predictive nomogram and risk classification system were developed and validated, and the nomogram demonstrated good performance in prognostic prediction and risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely recognized as the primary cause of Cardiogenic Shock (CS), Non-AMI related CS has been excluded from the majority of CS studies. Information on its prognostic factors remains largely understudied, and it is necessary to focus on these patients to identify the specific risk factors. In this study, we aimed to build and validate a predictive nomogram and risk classification system.

Methods: 1298 patients and 548 patients with CS from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) and MIMIC-III databases were included in the study after excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lasson and logistic regression analysis were used to identify statistically significant predictors which were finally involved in the nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram was validated by calibration plots and was compared with other scoring systems by AUC and DCA curves.

Results: Age, heart rate, WBC count, albumin level, lactic acid level, GCS Score, 24 h urine output, and vasopressor use were identified as the most critical factors for in-hospital death. Based on these results, a nomogram was established for predicting in-hospital mortality. The AUC value of the nomogram was 0.806 in the training group and 0.814 and 0.730 in the internal and external validation sets, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of other commonly used Intensive Care Unit scoring systems (SAPSII, APSIII, and SOFA).In addition, the survival curve showed significant differences in the 30-day survival of the three risk subgroups divided by the nomogram.

Conclusion: For non-AMI associated CS, a predictive nomogram and risk classification system were developed and validated, and the nomogram demonstrated good performance in prognostic prediction and risk stratification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者短期预后的临床预测模型
背景:虽然急性心肌梗死(AMI)被广泛认为是心源性休克(CS)的主要原因,但非AMI相关的CS已被排除在大多数CS研究之外。有关其预后因素的信息仍未得到充分研究,有必要关注这些患者以确定具体的危险因素。在这项研究中,我们的目的是建立和验证一个预测nomogram和风险分类系统。方法:在排除急性心肌梗死患者后,从重症监护医学信息市场IV (MIMIC-IV)和MIMIC-III数据库中分别纳入1298例和548例CS患者。使用拉森和逻辑回归分析来确定统计上显著的预测因子,这些预测因子最终涉及到nomogram。通过标定图验证了nomogram的预测性能,并通过AUC和DCA曲线与其他评分系统进行了比较。结果:年龄、心率、白细胞计数、白蛋白水平、乳酸水平、GCS评分、24小时尿量和血管加压药的使用被确定为院内死亡的最关键因素。基于这些结果,建立了预测住院死亡率的nomogram。训练组的nomogram AUC值为0.806,内部验证集和外部验证集的AUC值分别为0.814和0.730,显著高于其他常用的重症监护病房评分系统(SAPSII、APSIII和SOFA)。此外,生存曲线上以nomogram划分的三个风险亚组的30天生存率存在显著差异。结论:对于非ami相关性CS,建立并验证了预测nomogram和风险分类系统,nomogram在预后预测和风险分层方面表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
期刊最新文献
SHOCK SYNOPSIS FEBRUARY 2025. USP9X PROMOTES LPS-INDUCED FIBROBLAST CELL APOPTOSIS, INFLAMMATION, AND OXIDATIVE STRESS BY REGULATION OF TBL1XR1 DEUBIQUITINATION. ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY FOLLOWING ACUTE CHOLANGITIS: A RISK MULTIPLIER FOR ADVERSE OUTCOMES AND HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION. PANAXADIOL SAPONIN ALLEVIATES LPS-INDUCED CARDIOMYOPATHY SIMILAR TO DEXAMETHASONE VIA IMPROVING MITOCHONDRIAL QUALITY CONTROL. CONTINUOUS KIDNEY REPLACEMENT THERAPY DOSAGE AND MORTALITY IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY USING MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODEL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1