Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Early and Late C-Reactive Protein and Interleukin-6 in Patients with Non-Severe Ischaemic Stroke and Carotid Atherosclerosis.

IF 2 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1159/000540773
Sarah Gorey, John J McCabe, Sean Collins, Karl McAuley, Rosanna Inzitari, Joe Harbison, Michael Marnane, David J Williams, Peter J Kelly
{"title":"Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Early and Late C-Reactive Protein and Interleukin-6 in Patients with Non-Severe Ischaemic Stroke and Carotid Atherosclerosis.","authors":"Sarah Gorey, John J McCabe, Sean Collins, Karl McAuley, Rosanna Inzitari, Joe Harbison, Michael Marnane, David J Williams, Peter J Kelly","doi":"10.1159/000540773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute and late inflammatory markers including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are associated with future vascular events after stroke. However, few longitudinal studies exist examining the intra-individual reproducibility of inflammatory biomarker measures at different timepoints after atherosclerotic stroke. We sought to examine the reproducibility of hsCRP and IL-6 in a cohort of patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) caused by ipsilateral carotid atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two observational cohort studies (DUCASS and BIOVASC) were pooled. Included patients had non-severe ischaemic stroke and ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (≥50%). Patients had bloods drawn within 2 weeks of their index stroke/TIA event which was stored for later analysis. All patients included were followed up at 5 years, and repeat phlebotomy was performed. Bloods were analysed for hsCRP and IL-6 using high-throughput immunochemiluminescence. Difference between baseline and follow-up blood levels and intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five participants were included, median age 69 (IQR: 63-77), and 51 (53.7%) had TIA as their presenting event. When biomarkers were dichotomised (for hsCRP <2 mg/L or ≥2 mg/L, and for IL-6 <7.5 pg/mL [median] or ≥7.5 pg/mL), 68.4% (IL-6) and 65.2% (hsCRP) of participants remained in the same risk category (high or low) over time. However, when analysed as a continuous variable, ICC coefficients were low: ICC for IL-6 0.14 (95% CI: -0.06 to 0.33), ICC for hsCRP 0.05 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.25). ICC increased after removing outliers. Clinical characteristics and treatment were not associated with observed variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that concordance between early- and late-phase inflammatory marker risk categories is modest, and absolute levels are not highly correlated at early and late timepoints, despite associations at both times with future vascular risk. Investigators should standardise timing of phlebotomy and analysis protocols in future studies of inflammatory biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45709,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","volume":" ","pages":"19-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute and late inflammatory markers including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are associated with future vascular events after stroke. However, few longitudinal studies exist examining the intra-individual reproducibility of inflammatory biomarker measures at different timepoints after atherosclerotic stroke. We sought to examine the reproducibility of hsCRP and IL-6 in a cohort of patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) caused by ipsilateral carotid atherosclerosis.

Methods: Two observational cohort studies (DUCASS and BIOVASC) were pooled. Included patients had non-severe ischaemic stroke and ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis (≥50%). Patients had bloods drawn within 2 weeks of their index stroke/TIA event which was stored for later analysis. All patients included were followed up at 5 years, and repeat phlebotomy was performed. Bloods were analysed for hsCRP and IL-6 using high-throughput immunochemiluminescence. Difference between baseline and follow-up blood levels and intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated.

Results: Ninety-five participants were included, median age 69 (IQR: 63-77), and 51 (53.7%) had TIA as their presenting event. When biomarkers were dichotomised (for hsCRP <2 mg/L or ≥2 mg/L, and for IL-6 <7.5 pg/mL [median] or ≥7.5 pg/mL), 68.4% (IL-6) and 65.2% (hsCRP) of participants remained in the same risk category (high or low) over time. However, when analysed as a continuous variable, ICC coefficients were low: ICC for IL-6 0.14 (95% CI: -0.06 to 0.33), ICC for hsCRP 0.05 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.25). ICC increased after removing outliers. Clinical characteristics and treatment were not associated with observed variability.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that concordance between early- and late-phase inflammatory marker risk categories is modest, and absolute levels are not highly correlated at early and late timepoints, despite associations at both times with future vascular risk. Investigators should standardise timing of phlebotomy and analysis protocols in future studies of inflammatory biomarkers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非重度缺血性卒中和颈动脉粥样硬化患者早期和晚期c反应蛋白和白细胞介素-6的个体内可重复性
急性和晚期炎症标志物包括高敏c反应蛋白(hsCRP)和白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)与中风后未来的血管事件相关。然而,很少有纵向研究检查动脉粥样硬化性卒中后不同时间点炎症生物标志物测量的个体内可重复性。我们试图检验hsCRP和IL-6在同侧颈动脉粥样硬化引起的轻微卒中或短暂性缺血发作(TIA)患者队列中的再现性。方法:合并两项观察性队列研究(DUCASS和BIOVASC)。纳入的患者有非严重缺血性卒中和同侧颈内动脉狭窄(≥50%)。患者在其指数卒中/TIA事件发生后2周内抽血,并将其保存以供以后分析。所有患者随访5年,再次行静脉切开术。采用高通量免疫化学发光法分析血液中hsCRP和IL-6的含量。计算基线与随访血药浓度及组内相关性(ICC)的差异。结果:纳入95名参与者,中位年龄69岁(IQR 63-77), 51名(53.7%)以TIA为首发事件。结论:我们的研究结果表明,早期和晚期炎症标志物风险类别之间的一致性是适度的,尽管早期和晚期的绝对水平与未来的血管风险相关,但在早期和晚期的时间点上并不高度相关。在未来的炎症生物标志物研究中,研究人员应该规范静脉切开术的时间和分析方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of stroke and cerebrovascular research, drawing from a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. Offering an international forum, it meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues. The journal publishes original contributions, reviews of selected topics as well as clinical investigative studies. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears only if directly relevant to clinical issues. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Cerebrovascular Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Emergency Department Workflow Times of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A prospective cohort study before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Top of Basilar Artery Occlusion Thromboembolism in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy. Stroke Epidemiology in Asia. Safe Navigation of Guiding Catheters during Stenting for Common Carotid Artery Lesions: The "No-touch" Technique. Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1