A dynamic customized electronic health record rule based clinical decision support tool for standardized adult intensive care metrics.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae143
Eric W Cucchi, Joseph Burzynski, Nicholas Marshall, Bruce Greenberg
{"title":"A dynamic customized electronic health record rule based clinical decision support tool for standardized adult intensive care metrics.","authors":"Eric W Cucchi, Joseph Burzynski, Nicholas Marshall, Bruce Greenberg","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Many routine patient care items should be reviewed at least daily for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. These items are often incompletely performed, and dynamic clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) may improve attention to these daily items. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of institutionalized electronic health record (EHR) based custom dynamic CDST to support 22 ICU rounding quality metrics across 7 categories (hypoglycemia, venothromboembolism prophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, mechanical ventilation, sedation, nutrition, and catheter removal).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The dynamic CDST evaluates patient characteristics and patient orders, then identifies gaps between active interventions and conditions with recommendations of evidence based clinical practice guidelines across 22 areas of care for each patient. The results of the tool prompt clinicians to address any identified care gaps. We completed a confusion matrix to assess the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the dynamic CDST and the individual metrics.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic medical center and community hospital ICUs.</p><p><strong>Subject: </strong>Customized Clinical Decision Support Tool.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The metrics were evaluated 1421 times over 484 patients. The overall accuracy of the entire dynamic CDST is 0.979 with a sensitivity of 0.979, specificity of 0.978, PPV 0.969, and NPV 0.986.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A customized, EHR based dynamic CDST can be highly accurate. Integrating a comprehensive dynamic CDST into existing workflows could improve attention and actions related to routine ICU quality metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"7 4","pages":"ooae143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Many routine patient care items should be reviewed at least daily for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. These items are often incompletely performed, and dynamic clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) may improve attention to these daily items. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of institutionalized electronic health record (EHR) based custom dynamic CDST to support 22 ICU rounding quality metrics across 7 categories (hypoglycemia, venothromboembolism prophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, mechanical ventilation, sedation, nutrition, and catheter removal).

Design: The dynamic CDST evaluates patient characteristics and patient orders, then identifies gaps between active interventions and conditions with recommendations of evidence based clinical practice guidelines across 22 areas of care for each patient. The results of the tool prompt clinicians to address any identified care gaps. We completed a confusion matrix to assess the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the dynamic CDST and the individual metrics.

Setting: Tertiary academic medical center and community hospital ICUs.

Subject: Customized Clinical Decision Support Tool.

Measurements and main results: The metrics were evaluated 1421 times over 484 patients. The overall accuracy of the entire dynamic CDST is 0.979 with a sensitivity of 0.979, specificity of 0.978, PPV 0.969, and NPV 0.986.

Conclusions: A customized, EHR based dynamic CDST can be highly accurate. Integrating a comprehensive dynamic CDST into existing workflows could improve attention and actions related to routine ICU quality metrics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于标准化成人重症监护指标的基于临床决策支持工具的动态定制电子健康记录规则。
目的:重症监护病房(ICU)患者应至少每天回顾许多常规患者护理项目。这些项目往往不完全执行,动态临床决策支持工具(CDSTs)可以提高对这些日常项目的关注。我们试图评估基于制度化电子健康记录(EHR)的自定义动态CDST的准确性,以支持7类(低血糖、静脉血栓栓塞预防、应激性溃疡预防、机械通气、镇静、营养和拔管)的22个ICU舍入质量指标。设计:动态CDST评估患者特征和患者订单,然后识别积极干预措施和条件之间的差距,并为每个患者提供基于证据的临床实践指南,涵盖22个护理领域。该工具的结果提示临床医生解决任何已确定的护理差距。我们完成了一个混淆矩阵来评估动态CDST和个体指标的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。环境:三级学术医疗中心和社区医院icu。主题:定制临床决策支持工具。测量指标及主要结果:484例患者共评估指标1421次。整个动态CDST的总体准确度为0.979,敏感性0.979,特异性0.978,PPV 0.969, NPV 0.986。结论:定制的、基于电子病历的动态CDST可以高度准确。将全面的动态CDST集成到现有的工作流程中可以提高与常规ICU质量指标相关的关注和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aligning prediction models with clinical information needs: infant sepsis case study. Semantic enrichment of Pomeranian health study data using LOINC and WHO-FIC terminology mapping principles. Exploring beyond diagnoses in electronic health records to improve discovery: a review of the phenome-wide association study. Toward digital caregiving network interventions for children with medical complexity living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Transforming appeal decisions: machine learning triage for hospital admission denials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1