Evaluation of meniscal injury on magnetic resonance imaging and knee arthroscopy in patient with anterior cruciate ligament tear.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS SICOT-J Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024051
Toan Thanh Vo, Duc Thien Nguyen, Nguyen Anh Dinh Le, Ky Hien Van Nguyen, Hiep Khanh Vuu, Tu Anh Le, Nguyen Ba Le Phan
{"title":"Evaluation of meniscal injury on magnetic resonance imaging and knee arthroscopy in patient with anterior cruciate ligament tear.","authors":"Toan Thanh Vo, Duc Thien Nguyen, Nguyen Anh Dinh Le, Ky Hien Van Nguyen, Hiep Khanh Vuu, Tu Anh Le, Nguyen Ba Le Phan","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meniscal injuries often occur in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Failure to detect meniscal tears in patients with ACL injuries can lead to more complex tears and make them more difficult to repair.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the degree of correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and knee arthroscopy in diagnosing meniscal injuries in patients with ACL tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 185 patients diagnosed with ACL tears through knee arthroscopy at Thong Nhat Hospital from April 2023 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of MRI and its correlation with arthroscopy in detecting meniscal injuries is 69.2%, indicating a low degree of agreement between MRI and arthroscopy results. Diagnosis of meniscal injury location has an accuracy of 57.1%, indicating a minimal to low degree of agreement between MRI and arthroscopy results. Diagnosis of the injury region: Accuracy over 85%, with Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.3 to 0.59, p < 0.001. Diagnosis of the morphology of meniscal injuries: Accuracy over 89%, with Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.26 to 0.66, p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a minimal to moderate correlation between MRI and arthroscopy in detecting, and diagnosing the location, region, and morphology of meniscal injuries in patients with ACL tears. Therefore, caution is advised when diagnosing meniscal injuries based solely on MRI findings in patients with ACL tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Meniscal injuries often occur in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Failure to detect meniscal tears in patients with ACL injuries can lead to more complex tears and make them more difficult to repair.

Objective: To determine the degree of correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and knee arthroscopy in diagnosing meniscal injuries in patients with ACL tears.

Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 185 patients diagnosed with ACL tears through knee arthroscopy at Thong Nhat Hospital from April 2023 to April 2024.

Results: The accuracy of MRI and its correlation with arthroscopy in detecting meniscal injuries is 69.2%, indicating a low degree of agreement between MRI and arthroscopy results. Diagnosis of meniscal injury location has an accuracy of 57.1%, indicating a minimal to low degree of agreement between MRI and arthroscopy results. Diagnosis of the injury region: Accuracy over 85%, with Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.3 to 0.59, p < 0.001. Diagnosis of the morphology of meniscal injuries: Accuracy over 89%, with Kappa coefficients ranging from 0.26 to 0.66, p < 0.001.

Conclusion: There is a minimal to moderate correlation between MRI and arthroscopy in detecting, and diagnosing the location, region, and morphology of meniscal injuries in patients with ACL tears. Therefore, caution is advised when diagnosing meniscal injuries based solely on MRI findings in patients with ACL tears.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带撕裂患者半月板损伤的磁共振成像和膝关节镜评价。
简介:半月板损伤通常与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤有关。前交叉韧带损伤患者的半月板撕裂检测失败可能导致更复杂的撕裂,使其更难以修复。目的:探讨磁共振成像(MRI)与膝关节镜检查在前交叉韧带撕裂患者半月板损伤诊断中的相关性。方法:对2023年4月至2024年4月在Thong Nhat医院通过膝关节镜诊断为ACL撕裂的185例患者进行前瞻性描述性研究。结果:MRI及其与关节镜检查半月板损伤的相关性准确率为69.2%,MRI与关节镜检查结果的一致性较低。半月板损伤位置的诊断准确率为57.1%,表明MRI和关节镜检查结果之间的一致性很小。损伤区域的诊断:准确率超过85%,Kappa系数范围为0.3 ~ 0.59,p结论:MRI与关节镜在检测和诊断前交叉韧带撕裂患者半月板损伤的位置、区域和形态方面有轻微到中度的相关性。因此,在仅根据前交叉韧带撕裂患者的MRI结果诊断半月板损伤时,建议谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional alignment is a feasible alignment strategy in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformity - A case series. Relationship between the location of the popliteal artery and the tibial osteotomy plane in patients with medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings. Inferior outcome of stand-alone short versus long tibial stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective comparative study with minimum 2 year follow-up. Revisiting two thousand hinge fractures in open wedge high tibial osteotomy with a fifty years review: the oscillating saw cannot replace the traditional "ear-hand" dialogue between osteotome and hammer to estimate the elastic modulus of bone. The rectus abdominis tendon insertion to the pubic bone and its clinical implications: A cadaveric study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1