Icodextrin versus Glucose 2.5% on markers of hypervolemia and survival of patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis with an unplanned start: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0980
Leonardo Sotello Azevedo, Vanessa Burgugi Banin, Dayana Bitencourt Dias, Marcela Lara Mendes, Camila Albuquerque Alves, Maryanne Zilli Canedo Silva, Thyago Proença de Moraes, Daniela Ponce
{"title":"Icodextrin versus Glucose 2.5% on markers of hypervolemia and survival of patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis with an unplanned start: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Leonardo Sotello Azevedo, Vanessa Burgugi Banin, Dayana Bitencourt Dias, Marcela Lara Mendes, Camila Albuquerque Alves, Maryanne Zilli Canedo Silva, Thyago Proença de Moraes, Daniela Ponce","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The efficacy of icodextrin versus glucose patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis remains unclear. The study was designed to compare the effects of once-daily long-dwell icodextrin versus glucose on markers of hypervolemia and survival among patients with kidney failure undergoing an unplanned initiation of automated peritoneal dialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, non-blinded, and prospective controlled study. Prevalent and stable patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis with a recent peritoneal equilibration test showing a dialysate/plasma creatinine of >0.50 were randomized to receive either 7.5% icodextrin or 2.5% glucose solution. Patients were evaluated at baseline (one month after the start of peritoneal dialysis), 3 months, and 6 months after inclusion. The peritoneal dialysis solution was used for at least 3 months, with a follow-up period of 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were enrolled. There were no baseline differences between the groups. During the study period, patients in the Icodextrin Group showed improvements in the phase angle and ultrafiltration, whereas there were no changes in the Glucose Group. Additionally, extracellular water was significantly lower in the Icodextrin Group at the end of the study than at baseline. No statistical differences between the two groups were observed in urine volume, ultrafiltration, extracellular water, phase angle, renal creatinine clearance, use of diuretics and antihypertensives, or blood pressure. During the 24-month follow-up, the number of events related to overall mortality was seven (Icodextrin Group, n=4; Glucose Group, n=3), with no difference between the groups for this outcome or technique survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Icodextrin significantly improved ultrafiltration, extracellular water, and phase angle at the end of the study compared to baseline in patients on the urgent start of automated peritoneal dialysis.</p><p><strong>Registry of clinical trials: </strong>(www.ctri.nic.in) under the number RBR-97z4wh6.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"22 ","pages":"eAO0980"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The efficacy of icodextrin versus glucose patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis remains unclear. The study was designed to compare the effects of once-daily long-dwell icodextrin versus glucose on markers of hypervolemia and survival among patients with kidney failure undergoing an unplanned initiation of automated peritoneal dialysis.

Methods: This was a randomized, non-blinded, and prospective controlled study. Prevalent and stable patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis with a recent peritoneal equilibration test showing a dialysate/plasma creatinine of >0.50 were randomized to receive either 7.5% icodextrin or 2.5% glucose solution. Patients were evaluated at baseline (one month after the start of peritoneal dialysis), 3 months, and 6 months after inclusion. The peritoneal dialysis solution was used for at least 3 months, with a follow-up period of 24 months.

Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. There were no baseline differences between the groups. During the study period, patients in the Icodextrin Group showed improvements in the phase angle and ultrafiltration, whereas there were no changes in the Glucose Group. Additionally, extracellular water was significantly lower in the Icodextrin Group at the end of the study than at baseline. No statistical differences between the two groups were observed in urine volume, ultrafiltration, extracellular water, phase angle, renal creatinine clearance, use of diuretics and antihypertensives, or blood pressure. During the 24-month follow-up, the number of events related to overall mortality was seven (Icodextrin Group, n=4; Glucose Group, n=3), with no difference between the groups for this outcome or technique survival.

Conclusion: Icodextrin significantly improved ultrafiltration, extracellular water, and phase angle at the end of the study compared to baseline in patients on the urgent start of automated peritoneal dialysis.

Registry of clinical trials: (www.ctri.nic.in) under the number RBR-97z4wh6.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机对照试验:Icodextrin vs葡萄糖2.5%对高血容量标记物和计划外开始的自动腹膜透析患者的存活率的影响
目的:对腹膜透析患者应用醋酸糊精降低血糖的疗效尚不清楚。该研究旨在比较每日一次的长效碘糊精与葡萄糖对接受计划外自动腹膜透析的肾衰竭患者高血容量标志物和生存率的影响。方法:随机、非盲、前瞻性对照研究。流行和稳定的患者接受自动腹膜透析,最近的腹膜平衡试验显示透析液/血浆肌酐为bb0.50,随机接受7.5%的碘糊精或2.5%的葡萄糖溶液。患者在基线(开始腹膜透析后1个月)、纳入后3个月和6个月进行评估。腹膜透析液至少使用3个月,随访24个月。结果:30例患者入组。两组之间没有基线差异。在研究期间,Icodextrin组患者在相角和超滤方面均有改善,而葡萄糖组无变化。此外,在研究结束时,Icodextrin组的细胞外水明显低于基线。两组在尿量、超滤、细胞外水、相位角、肾肌酐清除率、利尿剂和降压药的使用、血压等方面均无统计学差异。在24个月的随访中,与总死亡率相关的事件数为7例(Icodextrin组,n=4;葡萄糖组(n=3),两组之间在该结果或技术生存率方面无差异。结论:与基线相比,在紧急开始自动腹膜透析的患者中,Icodextrin显著改善了研究结束时的超滤、细胞外水和相角。临床试验注册:www.ctri.nic.in,编号为RBR-97z4wh6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hand hygiene adherence in intensive care units: comparison before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a municipality of São Paulo state. Remote team-based learning during COVID-19: lower academic performance is associated with the exclusion of test grades from final grades. Efficacy of treatment with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as adoptive cell therapy: an integrative review. Epiphyseal displacement of the distal humerus in a neonate: a case report. Frailty over the rainbow: a cross-sectional study of LGBT+ adults aged over 50 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1