Liver-first approach to the treatment of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2024RW0596
Bruno Mirandola Bulisani, Milena Arruda de Oliveira Leite, Jaques Waisberg
{"title":"Liver-first approach to the treatment of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bruno Mirandola Bulisani, Milena Arruda de Oliveira Leite, Jaques Waisberg","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2024RW0596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal approach to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma and synchronous liver metastases remains controversial. The objective of this review was to analyze the outcomes of adopting the liver-first approach for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases who initially underwent systemic chemotherapy and/or resection of the metastatic lesions and primary colorectal carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for the identification and retrieval of eligible studies. Studies that included details of using the liver-first approach for the treatment of synchronous liver metastases of colorectal cancer and its outcomes, including the patients' survival data, were included. Proportional meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects restricted maximum likelihood method to summarize the three- and five-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred and fifty-five articles describing the results of studies on the liver-first approach were identified. Three independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the articles and excluded 750 articles. Thereafter, 29 retrospective and comparative studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. No randomized controlled trials were identified in the database search.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy for hepatic metastasis can prepare a patient for resection of liver metastases, offering the opportunity for potentially curative treatment of synchronous hepatic metastases initially considered unresectable. The decision regarding the resection of primary colorectal carcinoma and liver metastases should be based on individualized patient response. Prospero database registration ID: CRD42022337047 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"22 ","pages":"eRW0596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024RW0596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The optimal approach to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma and synchronous liver metastases remains controversial. The objective of this review was to analyze the outcomes of adopting the liver-first approach for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases who initially underwent systemic chemotherapy and/or resection of the metastatic lesions and primary colorectal carcinoma.

Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for the identification and retrieval of eligible studies. Studies that included details of using the liver-first approach for the treatment of synchronous liver metastases of colorectal cancer and its outcomes, including the patients' survival data, were included. Proportional meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects restricted maximum likelihood method to summarize the three- and five-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the patients.

Results: Eight hundred and fifty-five articles describing the results of studies on the liver-first approach were identified. Three independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the articles and excluded 750 articles. Thereafter, 29 retrospective and comparative studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. No randomized controlled trials were identified in the database search.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy for hepatic metastasis can prepare a patient for resection of liver metastases, offering the opportunity for potentially curative treatment of synchronous hepatic metastases initially considered unresectable. The decision regarding the resection of primary colorectal carcinoma and liver metastases should be based on individualized patient response. Prospero database registration ID: CRD42022337047 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝脏优先治疗同步结直肠肝转移患者:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:结直肠癌合并同步肝转移的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。本综述的目的是分析采用肝优先方法治疗结肠直肠癌同步肝转移患者的结果,这些患者最初接受了全身化疗和/或转移灶和原发性结直肠癌的切除术。方法:本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS和Cochrane中央对照试验注册数据库以确定和检索符合条件的研究。包括使用肝优先方法治疗结直肠癌同步肝转移的详细信息及其结果(包括患者的生存数据)的研究被纳入。采用随机效应限制最大似然法进行比例荟萃分析,总结患者的3年和5年总生存率和复发率。结果:855篇文章描述了肝优先入路的研究结果。三位独立审稿人筛选了文章的标题和摘要,并排除了750篇文章。随后,纳入了29项符合纳入标准的回顾性和比较研究。在数据库检索中未发现随机对照试验。结论:肝转移的全身化疗新辅助治疗可以为患者切除肝转移做好准备,为最初认为不可切除的同步肝转移提供潜在的治愈治疗机会。决定是否切除原发性结直肠癌和肝转移应基于个体化患者的反应。普洛斯彼罗数据库注册ID: CRD42022337047 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hand hygiene adherence in intensive care units: comparison before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a municipality of São Paulo state. Remote team-based learning during COVID-19: lower academic performance is associated with the exclusion of test grades from final grades. Efficacy of treatment with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as adoptive cell therapy: an integrative review. Epiphyseal displacement of the distal humerus in a neonate: a case report. Frailty over the rainbow: a cross-sectional study of LGBT+ adults aged over 50 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1