Ropivacaine-epinephrine-clonidine-ketorolac is an effective opioid-sparing local anesthetic for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.021
Anthony V Nguyen, Jose M Soto, Kristin A Keith, Kristopher A Lyon, Mark D Rahm, Jason H Huang
{"title":"Ropivacaine-epinephrine-clonidine-ketorolac is an effective opioid-sparing local anesthetic for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.","authors":"Anthony V Nguyen, Jose M Soto, Kristin A Keith, Kristopher A Lyon, Mark D Rahm, Jason H Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Ropivacaine-Epinephrine-Clonidine-Ketorolac (RECK) cocktail can improve pain control in patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Given the aging population, rising healthcare costs, the opioid epidemic, and associations of acute pain control with long-term opioid use, effective opioid-sparing analgesia following spinal fusion surgery may impart societal benefits.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether RECK was an effective local anesthetic for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Single-center retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery from June 2019 to June 2021 OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative pain levels as determined by Visual Analog Scale, in-hospital opioid consumption, length-of-stay <4 days, and long-term opioid utilization at 3-months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes of interest were rates of discharge to home, complication rates, readmissions within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed whether opioid exposure, patient-specific or surgery-specific factors, and administration of RECK (versus another local anesthetic) were associated with postoperative pain levels, in-hospital opioid consumption, length-of-stay, home discharge, long-term opioid utilization, complications, and readmissions within 90 days using multivariable regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 162 patients meeting study criteria, 49 (30.2%) received RECK. RECK was significantly associated with decreased pain levels at 2-, 4-, 6-, and 12-hours postoperatively (p≤.001-.01). RECK was associated with decreased total and daily inpatient opioid utilization (as measured by oral morphine equivalents) in multivariable linear regression (B=-159.6, 95% CI:-255.5- -63.6, p=.002 and B=-27.9, 95% CI:-48.9- -7.0, p=.01, respectively). Length-of-stay duration of <4 days was associated with RECK administration (OR 4.1, 95% CI:1.4-13.2, p=.01) and was negatively associated with levels fused (OR 0.4, 95% CI:0.2-0.7, p=.005) and durotomy (OR 0.02, 95% CI:0.0009-0.1, p<.001). Prolonged postoperative opioid utilization was associated with preoperative opioid prescription (OR 3.6, 95% CI:1.7-7.8, p=.001) and was negatively associated with RECK (OR 0.4, 95% CI:0.2-0.9, p=.04). RECK was not associated with readmissions, complications, or home discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion, RECK was superior to other local anesthetics as it improved pain control, decreased length-of-stay, and decreased opioid utilization. RECK was not associated with increased complications, readmissions, or rates of discharge to home.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Ropivacaine-Epinephrine-Clonidine-Ketorolac (RECK) cocktail can improve pain control in patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Given the aging population, rising healthcare costs, the opioid epidemic, and associations of acute pain control with long-term opioid use, effective opioid-sparing analgesia following spinal fusion surgery may impart societal benefits.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether RECK was an effective local anesthetic for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

Study design/setting: Single-center retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery from June 2019 to June 2021 OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative pain levels as determined by Visual Analog Scale, in-hospital opioid consumption, length-of-stay <4 days, and long-term opioid utilization at 3-months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes of interest were rates of discharge to home, complication rates, readmissions within 90 days.

Methods: We analyzed whether opioid exposure, patient-specific or surgery-specific factors, and administration of RECK (versus another local anesthetic) were associated with postoperative pain levels, in-hospital opioid consumption, length-of-stay, home discharge, long-term opioid utilization, complications, and readmissions within 90 days using multivariable regression.

Results: Of the 162 patients meeting study criteria, 49 (30.2%) received RECK. RECK was significantly associated with decreased pain levels at 2-, 4-, 6-, and 12-hours postoperatively (p≤.001-.01). RECK was associated with decreased total and daily inpatient opioid utilization (as measured by oral morphine equivalents) in multivariable linear regression (B=-159.6, 95% CI:-255.5- -63.6, p=.002 and B=-27.9, 95% CI:-48.9- -7.0, p=.01, respectively). Length-of-stay duration of <4 days was associated with RECK administration (OR 4.1, 95% CI:1.4-13.2, p=.01) and was negatively associated with levels fused (OR 0.4, 95% CI:0.2-0.7, p=.005) and durotomy (OR 0.02, 95% CI:0.0009-0.1, p<.001). Prolonged postoperative opioid utilization was associated with preoperative opioid prescription (OR 3.6, 95% CI:1.7-7.8, p=.001) and was negatively associated with RECK (OR 0.4, 95% CI:0.2-0.9, p=.04). RECK was not associated with readmissions, complications, or home discharge.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion, RECK was superior to other local anesthetics as it improved pain control, decreased length-of-stay, and decreased opioid utilization. RECK was not associated with increased complications, readmissions, or rates of discharge to home.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗哌卡因-肾上腺素-可乐定-酮咯酸是后路脊柱融合术患者有效的保留阿片类局部麻醉剂。
背景:罗哌卡因-肾上腺素-可乐定-酮咯酸(RECK)鸡尾酒可以改善腰椎减压患者的疼痛控制。鉴于人口老龄化、医疗成本上升、阿片类药物流行以及急性疼痛控制与长期阿片类药物使用的关联,脊柱融合手术后有效的阿片类药物节约镇痛可能会带来社会效益。目的:我们的目的是研究RECK对于后路脊柱融合术患者是否是一种有效的局部麻醉剂。研究设计/设置:单中心回顾性队列研究患者样本:2019年6月- 2021年6月接受后路脊柱融合术的患者。结果测量:主要研究结果为术后疼痛水平(由视觉模拟量表测定)、住院阿片类药物消耗、住院时间。我们使用多变量回归分析了阿片类药物暴露、患者特异性或手术特异性因素以及RECK给药(与另一种局麻药相比)是否与术后疼痛水平、住院阿片类药物消耗、住院时间、出院、长期阿片类药物使用、并发症和90天内再入院有关。结果:162例符合研究标准的患者中,49例(30.2%)接受了RECK治疗。RECK与术后2、4、6、12小时疼痛水平降低显著相关(P≤0.001 ~ 0.01)。在多变量线性回归中,RECK与减少总阿片类口服吗啡当量和每日住院患者口服吗啡当量相关(B=-159.6, 95% CI:-255.5- -63.6, P=。002和B=-27.9, 95% CI分别为-48.9 ~ -7.0,P= 0.01)。结论:在后路脊柱融合术患者中,RECK优于其他局麻药,因为它改善了疼痛控制,缩短了住院时间,减少了阿片类药物的使用。RECK与并发症增加、再入院或出院率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical differences of three cephalic fixation methods for patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation in the setting of congenital atlas occipitalization: a finite element analysis. Patient acceptance of reoperation risk for lumbar decompression versus fusion. A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Bodily growth and the intervertebral disc: a longitudinal MRI study in healthy adolescents. Contact between leaked cement and adjacent vertebral endplate induces a greater risk of adjacent vertebral fracture with vertebral bone cement augmentation biomechanically.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1