Do self-management supportive interventions reduce healthcare utilization for people with musculoskeletal pain conditions? – A systematic review

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.021
S. Grøn , M. Johansson , D. Schiphof , B. Koes , A. Kongsted
{"title":"Do self-management supportive interventions reduce healthcare utilization for people with musculoskeletal pain conditions? – A systematic review","authors":"S. Grøn ,&nbsp;M. Johansson ,&nbsp;D. Schiphof ,&nbsp;B. Koes ,&nbsp;A. Kongsted","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of self-management supportive interventions on healthcare utilization in adult cares seekers with musculoskeletal pain conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included studies comparing the effect of a self-management supportive intervention against a control intervention and included measures of healthcare utilization. Studies were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Pedro, and the Cochrane Library. Results were extracted for the follow-up point closest to 12 months. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2, and quality of evidence by The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results were synthesized on study level as mean differences or odds ratios with 95 % CI.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 28 studies. Eighteen studies reported on the use of primary care at follow-up, and ten, four, and 13 on specialty care, diagnostics imaging, and oral pain medication, respectively. Overall, there was very low-quality evidence for no effect of self-management interventions on healthcare utilization in all groups. All studies were classified as either having a “high risk of bias” or “some concerns”.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Due to substantial heterogeneity in the types and measurement of healthcare utilization outcomes, it was not feasible to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate an overall effect size. A standardized way of reporting and measuring these outcomes could aid future research in this area. The current evidence suggests that self-management supportive interventions do not affect healthcare utilization in people with musculoskeletal pain conditions, but future high-quality studies may substantially change this conclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 152-161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624004323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of self-management supportive interventions on healthcare utilization in adult cares seekers with musculoskeletal pain conditions.

Study design

Systematic review.

Methods

We included studies comparing the effect of a self-management supportive intervention against a control intervention and included measures of healthcare utilization. Studies were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Pedro, and the Cochrane Library. Results were extracted for the follow-up point closest to 12 months. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2, and quality of evidence by The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results were synthesized on study level as mean differences or odds ratios with 95 % CI.

Results

We included 28 studies. Eighteen studies reported on the use of primary care at follow-up, and ten, four, and 13 on specialty care, diagnostics imaging, and oral pain medication, respectively. Overall, there was very low-quality evidence for no effect of self-management interventions on healthcare utilization in all groups. All studies were classified as either having a “high risk of bias” or “some concerns”.

Conclusion

Due to substantial heterogeneity in the types and measurement of healthcare utilization outcomes, it was not feasible to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate an overall effect size. A standardized way of reporting and measuring these outcomes could aid future research in this area. The current evidence suggests that self-management supportive interventions do not affect healthcare utilization in people with musculoskeletal pain conditions, but future high-quality studies may substantially change this conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我管理支持干预是否会降低肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的医疗保健利用率?-系统评价。
研究目的本系统综述旨在研究自我管理支持性干预对患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年求医者使用医疗服务的影响:研究设计:系统综述:我们纳入了比较自我管理支持性干预与对照干预效果的研究,并纳入了医疗保健利用率的测量指标。研究在 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Pedro 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了检索。研究结果以最接近 12 个月的随访点为提取对象。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2 评估偏倚风险,并采用建议评估、制定和评价分级法评估证据质量。研究结果以平均差异或几率比加 95 % CI 的形式进行综合:我们纳入了 28 项研究。结果:我们纳入了 28 项研究,其中 18 项研究报告了随访时初级护理的使用情况,10 项、4 项和 13 项分别报告了专科护理、影像诊断和口服止痛药的使用情况。总体而言,有极低质量的证据表明,自我管理干预对所有组别的医疗保健使用率均无影响。所有研究均被归类为 "偏倚风险较高 "或 "存在一些问题":由于医疗保健利用率结果的类型和测量方法存在很大的异质性,因此无法进行荟萃分析来估算总体效应大小。对这些结果进行标准化的报告和测量,有助于今后在这一领域的研究。目前的证据表明,自我管理支持性干预措施不会影响肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的医疗保健利用率,但未来的高质量研究可能会大大改变这一结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for Co-Creation: A roadmap for planning a co-creation initiative from a case study on sedentary behaviour in Scottish SMEs – A health CASCADE study Effectiveness of digital contact tracing interventions for COVID-19: A systematic scoping review Effect of family physician contract service on patients’ perceived quality of primary child healthcare in urban China: Analysis using propensity score matching The impact of free subway passes on the social relationships and mental health of urban older people: A segmented regression analysis A multi-model approach to estimate excess mortality in the Nordics, 2020–2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1