Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction by Classical Eyelid Hygiene Measures With and Without Additional Lipid Substitution for Tear Film Stabilization.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001155
Isabel Weinstein, Augustin Kelava, Dieter Dausch, Berthold Seitz
{"title":"Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction by Classical Eyelid Hygiene Measures With and Without Additional Lipid Substitution for Tear Film Stabilization.","authors":"Isabel Weinstein, Augustin Kelava, Dieter Dausch, Berthold Seitz","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to document the treatment success of eyelid hygiene with liposomal suspension using new diagnostic tools and to determine whether additional lipid substitution provided measurable benefits in meibomian gland dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center controlled, partially single masked study was conducted. Group A used eyelid hygiene only, whereas group B additionally applied a liposomal eye spray. Subjective perception using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, measurement of tear film osmolarity, noninvasive tear film break-up time, assessment of the lipid layer, meibography, inspection of lid margins, assessment of the meibomian glands, and measurement of matrix-metallopeptidase-9 were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients were included and randomized into two groups. Both groups showed a decrease in OSDI score (P<0.001), an increase in lipid layer thickness (P<0.001), significant improvement in the degree of loss of meibomian glands (P<0.001), in the damage pattern of the eyelid margins (P<0.001), in the quality of meibomian gland secretion, and in matrix-metallopeptidase-9 after 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study confirms the success of treatment with eyelid hygiene measures using a liposomal suspension. The additional benefit of lipid substitution was not significant after 12 weeks of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to document the treatment success of eyelid hygiene with liposomal suspension using new diagnostic tools and to determine whether additional lipid substitution provided measurable benefits in meibomian gland dysfunction.

Methods: A single-center controlled, partially single masked study was conducted. Group A used eyelid hygiene only, whereas group B additionally applied a liposomal eye spray. Subjective perception using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, measurement of tear film osmolarity, noninvasive tear film break-up time, assessment of the lipid layer, meibography, inspection of lid margins, assessment of the meibomian glands, and measurement of matrix-metallopeptidase-9 were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks.

Results: Eighty-two patients were included and randomized into two groups. Both groups showed a decrease in OSDI score (P<0.001), an increase in lipid layer thickness (P<0.001), significant improvement in the degree of loss of meibomian glands (P<0.001), in the damage pattern of the eyelid margins (P<0.001), in the quality of meibomian gland secretion, and in matrix-metallopeptidase-9 after 12 weeks.

Conclusions: Our study confirms the success of treatment with eyelid hygiene measures using a liposomal suspension. The additional benefit of lipid substitution was not significant after 12 weeks of treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究目的本研究旨在利用新的诊断工具记录脂质体悬浮液治疗眼睑卫生的成功案例,并确定额外的脂质替代物是否能为睑板腺功能障碍带来可衡量的益处:方法:进行了一项单中心对照、部分单人蒙面研究。A组仅使用眼睑卫生用品,而B组则额外使用脂质体眼部喷雾剂。在基线和 12 周后,使用眼表疾病指数 (OSDI) 问卷收集主观感受、测量泪膜渗透压、无创泪膜破裂时间、评估脂质层、眼睑造影、检查睑缘、评估睑板腺以及测量基质金属肽酶-9:82名患者被随机分为两组。结果:82 名患者被随机分为两组,两组患者的 OSDI 评分(PConclusions.)均有所下降:我们的研究证实,使用脂质体悬浮液进行眼睑卫生措施治疗是成功的。治疗 12 周后,脂质替代的额外益处并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Doctors: Performance of Chatbots as a Tool for Patient Education on Keratoconus. Comparative Analysis of Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes in Corneal Tattooing (Keratopigmentation) versus Ocular Prosthesis. Drug Delivery in PROSE Device as Alternative to Frequent Drop Administration in Severe Ocular Surface Disease. Factors Contributing to Follow-up Nonadherence After Infectious Keratitis Diagnosis. Quality of Life Survey Using NEI VFQ-25 in Japanese Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1