Intra-individual Differences in Pericoronary Fat Attenuation Index Measurements Between Photon-counting and Energy-integrating Detector Computed Tomography

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.055
Giuseppe Tremamunno MD , Milan Vecsey-Nagy MD, PhD , Muhammad Taha Hagar MD , U. Joseph Schoepf MD , Jim O’Doherty PhD , Julian A. Luetkens MD , Daniel Kuetting MD , Alexander Isaak MD , Akos Varga-Szemes PhD, MD , Tilman Emrich MD , Dmitrij Kravchenko MD
{"title":"Intra-individual Differences in Pericoronary Fat Attenuation Index Measurements Between Photon-counting and Energy-integrating Detector Computed Tomography","authors":"Giuseppe Tremamunno MD ,&nbsp;Milan Vecsey-Nagy MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Muhammad Taha Hagar MD ,&nbsp;U. Joseph Schoepf MD ,&nbsp;Jim O’Doherty PhD ,&nbsp;Julian A. Luetkens MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Kuetting MD ,&nbsp;Alexander Isaak MD ,&nbsp;Akos Varga-Szemes PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Tilman Emrich MD ,&nbsp;Dmitrij Kravchenko MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to explore intra-individual differences in pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) fat attenuation index (FAI) between photon-counting detector (PCD)- and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>Patients were prospectively enrolled for a PCD-CT research scan within 30 days of EID-CT. Both acquisitions were reconstructed using a Qr36 kernel at 0.6 mm slice thickness (EID and PCD-down-sampled [DS]) and at 0.2 mm ultra-high resolution (UHR) for the PCD-CT. Iterative reconstruction was turned “off” (filter back projection used as alternative reconstruction method) or set to a recommended level in current literature. Coronary PCAT FAI was measured automatically using established thresholds of −190 to −30 HU at a set distance and radius. Statistical testing was performed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests (<em>p</em> significance was determined to be &lt;0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 40 patients (mean age 68±8 years, 32 males [80%]) were included for analysis. Absolute FAI measurements differed significantly for all vessels between all reconstructions in the ANOVA comparison (all p&lt;.001). The FAI decreased going from EID-CT to PCD-DS, to PCD-UHR with iterative reconstruction turned off (e.g. right coronary artery: EID-CT: −76.5±8.9 vs −80.9±7.0 vs −88.3±6.7 HU, respectively; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The mean FAI of datasets using iterative reconstruction did not demonstrate significant differences on multiple comparisons (e.g. left circumflex artery: EID: −65.7±8.5; PCD-DS: −66.0±7.4; PCD-UHR: −67.8±7.0 HU, respectively; p&gt;0.06).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intra-individual absolute PCAT FAI measurements differ significantly between EID- and PCD-CT when controlling for reconstruction kernel and slice thickness. However, the use of iterative reconstruction minimizes most differences in FAI, enabling inter-scanner comparability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 1333-1343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224009310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

The purpose of this study was to explore intra-individual differences in pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) fat attenuation index (FAI) between photon-counting detector (PCD)- and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT.

Material and Methods

Patients were prospectively enrolled for a PCD-CT research scan within 30 days of EID-CT. Both acquisitions were reconstructed using a Qr36 kernel at 0.6 mm slice thickness (EID and PCD-down-sampled [DS]) and at 0.2 mm ultra-high resolution (UHR) for the PCD-CT. Iterative reconstruction was turned “off” (filter back projection used as alternative reconstruction method) or set to a recommended level in current literature. Coronary PCAT FAI was measured automatically using established thresholds of −190 to −30 HU at a set distance and radius. Statistical testing was performed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests (p significance was determined to be <0.003).

Results

In total, 40 patients (mean age 68±8 years, 32 males [80%]) were included for analysis. Absolute FAI measurements differed significantly for all vessels between all reconstructions in the ANOVA comparison (all p<.001). The FAI decreased going from EID-CT to PCD-DS, to PCD-UHR with iterative reconstruction turned off (e.g. right coronary artery: EID-CT: −76.5±8.9 vs −80.9±7.0 vs −88.3±6.7 HU, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean FAI of datasets using iterative reconstruction did not demonstrate significant differences on multiple comparisons (e.g. left circumflex artery: EID: −65.7±8.5; PCD-DS: −66.0±7.4; PCD-UHR: −67.8±7.0 HU, respectively; p>0.06).

Conclusion

Intra-individual absolute PCAT FAI measurements differ significantly between EID- and PCD-CT when controlling for reconstruction kernel and slice thickness. However, the use of iterative reconstruction minimizes most differences in FAI, enabling inter-scanner comparability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光子计数和能量积分检测器计算机断层扫描在冠状动脉脂肪衰减指数测量中的个体差异。
基本原理和目的:本研究的目的是探讨光子计数检测器(PCD)-和能量积分检测器(EID)- ct在冠状动脉周围脂肪组织(PCAT)脂肪衰减指数(FAI)的个体内差异。材料和方法:前瞻性招募患者在EID-CT后30天内进行PCD-CT研究扫描。使用Qr36内核在0.6 mm层厚(EID和pcd下采样[DS])和0.2 mm超高分辨率(UHR)对PCD-CT进行重建。在当前文献中,迭代重建被“关闭”(滤波反投影被用作替代重建方法)或设置为推荐级别。冠状动脉PCAT FAI在设定的距离和半径范围内使用-190至-30 HU的阈值自动测量。采用重复测量方差分析和Bonferroni多重比较检验进行统计学检验(p显著性为)结果:共纳入40例患者进行分析,平均年龄68±8岁,男性32例[80%]。在方差分析比较中,所有重建血管的绝对FAI测量值差异显著(均p0.06)。结论:在控制重建核和层厚时,EID- ct和PCD-CT的个体内绝对PCAT FAI测量值差异显著。然而,迭代重建的使用最小化了FAI的大多数差异,实现了扫描仪之间的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Visceral-to-Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Ratio: Pericardial Adipose Tissue is a More Reliable Predictor of CAD Severity and Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden. Machine Learning Integration of MRI Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics Features for Predicting PNSTs Postoperative Complications. Comment on "Performance of Large Language Models on Radiology Residency In-Training Examination Questions". Noninvasive Prediction of Tumor Malignancy Grade in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Dual-Layer Detector CT: A Novel Index Integrating Histopathological Differentiation and Ki-67. CT-Based Radiomics Predicts the Functional State of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells and Prognosis in NSCLC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1