Sickle Cell Retinopathy Lost to Follow-up Study.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004369
Jovi C Y Wong, Meera D Sivalingam, Matthew Griffin, John Magagna, Bita Momenaei, Taku Wakabayashi, Roselind L Ni, Kristine Y Wang, Michael J Ammar, Jason Hsu, Yoshihiro Yonekawa
{"title":"Sickle Cell Retinopathy Lost to Follow-up Study.","authors":"Jovi C Y Wong, Meera D Sivalingam, Matthew Griffin, John Magagna, Bita Momenaei, Taku Wakabayashi, Roselind L Ni, Kristine Y Wang, Michael J Ammar, Jason Hsu, Yoshihiro Yonekawa","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the outcomes of sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) patients who experienced at least one episode of being lost to follow-up (LTFU) compared to those who attended all appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult SCR patients who visited Wills Eye Hospital Retina service (January 2012-December 2021) with >2 visits were reviewed for LTFU events, defined as failure to return for a follow-up appointment within 6 months of the scheduled date.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighty-one eyes of 94 patients were included. Fifty-one patients (99 eyes) attended all appointments (\"attended group\") whilst 43 patients (82 eyes), or 46%, had at least one LTFU event (\"LTFU group\"). The mean (standard deviation, SD) LTFU duration was 470 (329) days. In the LTFU group, mean (SD) VA was significantly worse at the final visit (logMAR 0.45 (0.63), Snellen 20/56) and at the post-LTFU visit (0.36 (0.59), 20/46) compared to the pre-LTFU visit (0.3 (0.47), 20/40, p = 0.001). In the attended group, mean (SD) VA was significantly better at the final visit (0.41 (0.63), 20/51) compared to the initial visit (0.52 (0.78), 20/66, p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SCR with an LTFU event have worse visual outcomes compared to patients who attend all appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the outcomes of sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) patients who experienced at least one episode of being lost to follow-up (LTFU) compared to those who attended all appointments.

Methods: Adult SCR patients who visited Wills Eye Hospital Retina service (January 2012-December 2021) with >2 visits were reviewed for LTFU events, defined as failure to return for a follow-up appointment within 6 months of the scheduled date.

Results: One hundred and eighty-one eyes of 94 patients were included. Fifty-one patients (99 eyes) attended all appointments ("attended group") whilst 43 patients (82 eyes), or 46%, had at least one LTFU event ("LTFU group"). The mean (standard deviation, SD) LTFU duration was 470 (329) days. In the LTFU group, mean (SD) VA was significantly worse at the final visit (logMAR 0.45 (0.63), Snellen 20/56) and at the post-LTFU visit (0.36 (0.59), 20/46) compared to the pre-LTFU visit (0.3 (0.47), 20/40, p = 0.001). In the attended group, mean (SD) VA was significantly better at the final visit (0.41 (0.63), 20/51) compared to the initial visit (0.52 (0.78), 20/66, p = 0.038).

Conclusion: Patients with SCR with an LTFU event have worse visual outcomes compared to patients who attend all appointments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镰状细胞性视网膜病变未纳入随访研究。
目的:确定至少经历过一次失访(LTFU)的镰状细胞视网膜病变(SCR)患者与参加所有预约的患者的结局。方法:对2012年1月至2021年12月期间到威尔斯眼科医院视网膜服务中心就诊的成年SCR患者进行LTFU事件的回顾,LTFU事件定义为未能在预定日期的6个月内返回随访预约。结果:纳入94例患者181只眼。51名患者(99只眼睛)参加了所有的预约(“出席组”),43名患者(82只眼睛),或46%,至少有一次LTFU事件(“LTFU组”)。LTFU的平均(标准差,SD)持续时间为470(329)天。在LTFU组中,与LTFU前(0.3 (0.47),20/40,p = 0.001)相比,LTFU组在最后一次访问时(logMAR 0.45 (0.63), Snellen 20/56)和LTFU后访问时(0.36(0.59),20/46)的平均(SD) VA明显更差。在就诊组中,最后一次就诊的平均(SD) VA(0.41(0.63), 20/51)明显优于初次就诊(0.52 (0.78),20/66,p = 0.038)。结论:与参加所有预约的患者相比,SCR合并LTFU事件的患者视力结果更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
期刊最新文献
Periocular Acupuncture Leading to Retinal Tear and Successful Repairment. PSEUDO RETINAL VASCULITIS IN A PRETERM BABY. Human Amniotic Membrane Patches Dislocated in the Anterior Chamber. AN EASY WAY TO PREVENT VELOCITY-RELATED COMPLICATIONS DURING DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT INJECTION IN VITRECTOMIZED EYES. VITRECTOMY COMBINED WITH INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP INSERTION OR SINGLE-LAYERED FLAP COVERING TECHNIQUE FOR HIGHLY MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES WITH MACULAR RETINOSCHISIS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1