Development and validation of a tool for ambulatory monitoring of peripherally inserted central catheter-associated complications.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1177/11297298241305731
Segers Sofie, Langbeen Jodie, Blot Stijn, Terryn Wim, Debrauwere Mieke, Vogelaers Dirk
{"title":"Development and validation of a tool for ambulatory monitoring of peripherally inserted central catheter-associated complications.","authors":"Segers Sofie, Langbeen Jodie, Blot Stijn, Terryn Wim, Debrauwere Mieke, Vogelaers Dirk","doi":"10.1177/11297298241305731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are the preferred vascular access for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) due to user-friendliness and high safety level. Nevertheless, the lack of a validated tool hampers the yet ill-charted epidemiology and monitoring of PICC related complications in ambulatory care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sequential exploratory mixed-method three phase research design was used to develop and validate a monitoring tool for PICC complications in OPAT. A literature review and co-design approach allowed its development, followed by Delphi panel content validation. In a third phase, the tool was piloted and implemented for further evaluation, including adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve and nine experts respectively participated in the first and second Delphi round (response rate: 92% resp. 69%). Scale-level Content Validity Index based on the Average Method was 0.99 and 0.90 in the first and the second Delphi round respectively. After the Delphi procedure, the tool consisted of the following relevant items: (1) functionality (injection and aspiration), (2) insertion site, (3) catheter fixation, (4) infection and (5) thrombosis. After positive pilot testing, the tool was implemented in 17 participants with outcomes measured in 15 participants. Two participants were readmitted and three experienced PICC complications. As for adherence, the monitoring tool was partially or fully completed 285 times (74,8%); external catheter length was rarely or never reported and systematic follow-up of the temperature scored poorly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A tool for ambulatory monitoring of PICC-associated complications with a solid content validity was obtained. Future research should consist of a multicentric larger size assessment and digitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298241305731"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241305731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are the preferred vascular access for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) due to user-friendliness and high safety level. Nevertheless, the lack of a validated tool hampers the yet ill-charted epidemiology and monitoring of PICC related complications in ambulatory care.

Methods: A sequential exploratory mixed-method three phase research design was used to develop and validate a monitoring tool for PICC complications in OPAT. A literature review and co-design approach allowed its development, followed by Delphi panel content validation. In a third phase, the tool was piloted and implemented for further evaluation, including adherence.

Results: Twelve and nine experts respectively participated in the first and second Delphi round (response rate: 92% resp. 69%). Scale-level Content Validity Index based on the Average Method was 0.99 and 0.90 in the first and the second Delphi round respectively. After the Delphi procedure, the tool consisted of the following relevant items: (1) functionality (injection and aspiration), (2) insertion site, (3) catheter fixation, (4) infection and (5) thrombosis. After positive pilot testing, the tool was implemented in 17 participants with outcomes measured in 15 participants. Two participants were readmitted and three experienced PICC complications. As for adherence, the monitoring tool was partially or fully completed 285 times (74,8%); external catheter length was rarely or never reported and systematic follow-up of the temperature scored poorly.

Conclusion: A tool for ambulatory monitoring of PICC-associated complications with a solid content validity was obtained. Future research should consist of a multicentric larger size assessment and digitalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证一种工具,用于动态监测外周插入中心导管相关并发症。
导读:外周插入中心导管(PICC)是门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗(OPAT)首选的血管通道,因为它使用方便且安全性高。然而,缺乏有效的工具阻碍了门诊护理中PICC相关并发症的流行病学和监测。方法:采用顺序探索性混合方法三期研究设计,开发并验证OPAT PICC并发症监测工具。文献回顾和共同设计方法允许其发展,随后是德尔菲面板内容验证。在第三阶段,该工具进行了试点和实施,以进一步评估,包括依从性。结果:第一轮和第二轮专家分别有12名和9名专家参与,回复率为92%。69%)。基于平均法的量表级内容效度指数在第一轮和第二轮德尔菲分别为0.99和0.90。德尔菲程序后,工具包括以下相关项目:(1)功能(注射和抽吸),(2)插入位置,(3)导管固定,(4)感染和(5)血栓形成。经过积极的试点测试,该工具在17名参与者中实施,并在15名参与者中测量了结果。2例再次入院,3例出现PICC并发症。依从性方面,监测工具部分或完全完成285次(74.8%);外置导管长度很少或从未报道过,系统随访的温度评分很差。结论:获得了一种具有可靠内容效度的picc相关并发症的动态监测工具。未来的研究应包括多中心更大规模的评估和数字化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Retraction: Novel electrospun polyurethane grafts for vascular access in rats. Feasibility and Safety of bedside placement of tunneled dialysis catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Retained foreign body in radial artery: Endovascular retrieval and salvage of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Role of renal vascular coordinator on access flow dysfunction: A quality improvement initiative on improving patency rate. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy co-guided removal of extravascular stripped central line guidewire fragments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1