Detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules by ultra-low-dose CT in lung cancer screening: a systematic review.

BJR open Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzae041
Zhijie Pan, Yaping Zhang, Lu Zhang, Lingyun Wang, Keke Zhao, Qingyao Li, Ai Wang, Yanfei Hu, Xueqian Xie
{"title":"Detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules by ultra-low-dose CT in lung cancer screening: a systematic review.","authors":"Zhijie Pan, Yaping Zhang, Lu Zhang, Lingyun Wang, Keke Zhao, Qingyao Li, Ai Wang, Yanfei Hu, Xueqian Xie","doi":"10.1093/bjro/tzae041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a lack of recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the use of ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) for the detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules. This review aims to summarize the latest advances of ULDCT in these areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of studies in PubMed and Web of Science was conducted, using search terms specific to ULDCT and lung nodules. The included studies were published in the last 5 years (January 2019-August 2024). Two reviewers independently selected articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and concerns using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-II (QUADAS-II) tool. The standard-dose, low-dose, or contrast-enhanced CT served as the reference-standard CT to evaluate ULDCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 15 high-quality articles on a total of 1889 patients, of which 10, 3, and 2 dealt with the detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules. QUADAS-II showed a generally low risk of bias. The mean radiation dose for ULDCT was 0.22 ± 0.10 mSv (7.7%) against 2.84 ± 1.80 mSv for reference-standard CT. Nodule detection rates ranged from 86.1% to 100%. The variability of diameter measurements ranged from 2.1% to 14.4% against contrast-enhanced CT and from 3.1% to 8.29% against standard CT. The diagnosis rate of malignant nodules ranged from 75% to 91%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ULDCT proves effective in detecting lung nodules while substantially reducing radiation exposure. However, the use of ULDCT for the measurement and diagnosis of lung nodules remains challenging and requires further research.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>When ULDCT reduces radiation exposure to 7.7%, it detects lung nodules at a rate of 86.1%-100%, with a measurement variance of 2.1%-14.4% and a diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of 75%-91%, suggesting the potential for safe and effective lung cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":"6 1","pages":"tzae041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzae041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is a lack of recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the use of ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) for the detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules. This review aims to summarize the latest advances of ULDCT in these areas.

Methods: A systematic review of studies in PubMed and Web of Science was conducted, using search terms specific to ULDCT and lung nodules. The included studies were published in the last 5 years (January 2019-August 2024). Two reviewers independently selected articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and concerns using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-II (QUADAS-II) tool. The standard-dose, low-dose, or contrast-enhanced CT served as the reference-standard CT to evaluate ULDCT.

Results: The literature search yielded 15 high-quality articles on a total of 1889 patients, of which 10, 3, and 2 dealt with the detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules. QUADAS-II showed a generally low risk of bias. The mean radiation dose for ULDCT was 0.22 ± 0.10 mSv (7.7%) against 2.84 ± 1.80 mSv for reference-standard CT. Nodule detection rates ranged from 86.1% to 100%. The variability of diameter measurements ranged from 2.1% to 14.4% against contrast-enhanced CT and from 3.1% to 8.29% against standard CT. The diagnosis rate of malignant nodules ranged from 75% to 91%.

Conclusions: ULDCT proves effective in detecting lung nodules while substantially reducing radiation exposure. However, the use of ULDCT for the measurement and diagnosis of lung nodules remains challenging and requires further research.

Advances in knowledge: When ULDCT reduces radiation exposure to 7.7%, it detects lung nodules at a rate of 86.1%-100%, with a measurement variance of 2.1%-14.4% and a diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of 75%-91%, suggesting the potential for safe and effective lung cancer screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Definition of a disability weight for human exposure to ionizing radiation and its application to the justification of medical exposure. Correction to: A review on optimization of Wilms tumour management using radiomics. Survival and relapse patterns in patients of cranial vs extra-cranial oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy and systemic therapy. Detection, measurement, and diagnosis of lung nodules by ultra-low-dose CT in lung cancer screening: a systematic review. Artificial intelligence research in radiation oncology: a practical guide for the clinician on concepts and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1