The impact of the xSPECT reconstruction algorithms on the recovery coefficients value for small tumors: a phantom study with 177Lu.

Ali Ebrahimifard, Hossein Rajabi, Parham Geramifar, Markus Luster, Behrooz Hooshyar Yousefi, Robin de Nijs
{"title":"The impact of the xSPECT reconstruction algorithms on the recovery coefficients value for small tumors: a phantom study with 177Lu.","authors":"Ali Ebrahimifard, Hossein Rajabi, Parham Geramifar, Markus Luster, Behrooz Hooshyar Yousefi, Robin de Nijs","doi":"10.1055/a-2418-2486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantifying small tumors is still a challenge due to the partial volume effect (PVE). Although iterative reconstruction had promising results with a better recovery coefficient (RC), it suffers from the PVE. RC values typically depend on the reconstruction method, which may affect on <sup>177</sup>Lu quantifying. In this study, we investigated the effect of different reconstruction methods on RC values for <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT images.A water-filled cylindrical polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom without background radioactivity with two solid cylinders which represent the bone and soft tissue equivalent was used for SPECT/CT imaging. We placed syringes with different volumes containing <sup>177</sup>Lu in the vicinity of the cylinders as tumors. The iterative reconstructions of xSPECT, xSPECT Bone, and Flash3D was performed on SPECT/CT images.The effect of the reconstruction algorithms on the RC values was determined by calculating the radioactivity concentration in volumes of interest which were drawn manually and by a threshold method.The xSPECT Bone reconstruction has shown an RC value of approximately 100%, while the other reconstructions typically show an RC value of 93%. The RC values for all the reconstructions were decreased for smaller tumors. The smallest tumor showed a minimum RC between 52% and 72% compared to the largest tumor.In this study, it was possible to obtain an RC value close to 100% when the xSPECT Bone reconstruction algorithm was used. The xSPECT results were slightly lower RC values compared to the Flash3D algorithm. In using standard RC curves for tumors close to the bone, special care has to be taken since RC values relative to bone are higher than in tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2418-2486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying small tumors is still a challenge due to the partial volume effect (PVE). Although iterative reconstruction had promising results with a better recovery coefficient (RC), it suffers from the PVE. RC values typically depend on the reconstruction method, which may affect on 177Lu quantifying. In this study, we investigated the effect of different reconstruction methods on RC values for 177Lu SPECT/CT images.A water-filled cylindrical polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom without background radioactivity with two solid cylinders which represent the bone and soft tissue equivalent was used for SPECT/CT imaging. We placed syringes with different volumes containing 177Lu in the vicinity of the cylinders as tumors. The iterative reconstructions of xSPECT, xSPECT Bone, and Flash3D was performed on SPECT/CT images.The effect of the reconstruction algorithms on the RC values was determined by calculating the radioactivity concentration in volumes of interest which were drawn manually and by a threshold method.The xSPECT Bone reconstruction has shown an RC value of approximately 100%, while the other reconstructions typically show an RC value of 93%. The RC values for all the reconstructions were decreased for smaller tumors. The smallest tumor showed a minimum RC between 52% and 72% compared to the largest tumor.In this study, it was possible to obtain an RC value close to 100% when the xSPECT Bone reconstruction algorithm was used. The xSPECT results were slightly lower RC values compared to the Flash3D algorithm. In using standard RC curves for tumors close to the bone, special care has to be taken since RC values relative to bone are higher than in tissue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
xSPECT重建算法对小肿瘤恢复系数值的影响:177Lu的幻影研究。
由于部分体积效应(PVE)的存在,对小肿瘤进行定量仍然是一个挑战。虽然迭代重建具有较好的恢复系数(RC),但存在PVE问题。RC值通常取决于重建方法,这可能会影响到177Lu的量化。在本研究中,我们研究了不同重建方法对177Lu SPECT/CT图像RC值的影响。一个充满水的圆柱形无背景放射性聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)幻影与两个实心圆柱体代表骨和软组织等效用于SPECT/CT成像。我们将含有177Lu的不同体积的注射器放置在圆柱体附近作为肿瘤。对SPECT/CT图像进行xSPECT、xSPECT Bone和Flash3D的迭代重建。重建算法对RC值的影响是通过计算人工绘制的感兴趣体积中的放射性浓度和阈值法来确定的。xSPECT骨重建显示的RC值约为100%,而其他重建通常显示的RC值为93%。对于较小的肿瘤,所有重建的RC值都降低。与最大的肿瘤相比,最小的肿瘤的最小RC在52% - 72%之间。在本研究中,使用xSPECT骨重建算法可以获得接近100%的RC值。与Flash3D算法相比,xSPECT结果的RC值略低。在对靠近骨骼的肿瘤使用标准RC曲线时,必须特别小心,因为相对于骨骼的RC值高于组织中的RC值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance of oxyphil cells for 99mTc-sestamibi uptake in primary hyperparathyroidism: a retrospective observational study. Radiomic signatures derived from baseline 18F FDG PET/CT imaging can predict tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte values in patients with primary breast cancer. The impact of the xSPECT reconstruction algorithms on the recovery coefficients value for small tumors: a phantom study with 177Lu. PSMA - Targeted Clinical Molecular Imaging of Atherosclerosis: Correlation with Cardiovascular Risk Factors. [18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging and Hematological Parameters Can Help Predict HPV Status in Head and Neck Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1